Social science answers to the essential question of group conflict have focused on two main explanations—their motivating “grievances” and their mobilization “capacity” for collective action. Recent years have seen a renewed focus on grievances in the form of horizontal inequalities (between-group inequality), but the important conceptual and potential empirical differences between horizontal inequality and relative deprivation have not yet been incorporated into this discussion fully. This article first discusses these distinctions, and then assesses how they influence collective violence using new global evidence. Consistent with the theoretical discussion, the empirical results indicate that these concepts are not substitutes, and indeed are only weakly correlated, but rather tap into distinct aspects of grievance. The paper discusses the implications of these results, validates them in a series of robustness checks, and concludes with possible extensions along with future directions.
AikenLSWestSG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AlesinaADevleeschauwerAEasterlyWKurlatSWacziargR (2003) Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth8(2): 155–194.
3.
BarbaletJM (1992) A macrosociology of emotion. Sociological Theory10(2): 150–163.
4.
BasedauMPierskallaJ (2014) How ethnicity conditions the effect of oil and gas on civil conflict: A spatial analysis of Africa from 1990 to 2010. Political Geography38(C): 1–11.
5.
BenoitKLaverM (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
6.
BesleyTPerssonT (2009) Repression or civil war?American Economic Review99(2): 292–297.
7.
BesleyTPerssonT (2011) The logic of political violence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3): 1411–1445.
8.
BrushSG (1996) Dynamics of theory change in the social sciences: Relative deprivation and collective violence. Journal of Conflict Resolutio, 40(4): 523–545.
9.
BuenodeMesquitaBFengY (1997) Forecasting China’s political and economic future. Problems of Post-Communism44(2): 14–27.
10.
BuhaugH (2010) Dude, where’s my conflict?Conflict Management and Peace Science27(2): 107–128.
11.
BuhaugHCedermanLEGleditschKS (2014) Square pegs in round holes. International Studies Quarterly 58(2): 418–431.
12.
BustikovaL (2014) Revenge of the radical right. Comparative Political Studies47(12): 1738–1765.
13.
BustikovaL (2020) Extreme Reactions: Radical Right Mobilization in Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
ButlerCGatesS (2009) Asymmetry, parity, and (civil) war. International Interactions35(3): 330–340.
15.
CedermanL-EWimmerAMinB (2010) Why do ethnic groups rebel? New data and analysis. World Politics62(1): 87–119.
16.
CedermanL-EGleditschKWeidmannN (2011) Horizontal inequalities and ethno-nationalist civil war: A global comparison. American Political Science Review, 105(3): 478–495.
17.
CedermanL-EGleditschKBuhaugH (2013) Inequality, Grievance and Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
CollierP (2000) Economic analysis of conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution44 (6): 839–853.
19.
CollierPHoefflerA (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers56: 563–595.
20.
CollierPHoefflerARohnerD (2009) Beyond greed and grievance: Feasibility and civil war. Oxford Economic Papers 61(1): 1–27.
21.
CorningAF (2000) Assessing perceived social inequity: A relative deprivation framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78 (3): 463–477.
22.
CranmerSJDesmaraisBA (2016) A critique of dyadic design. International Studies Quarterly60(2): 355–362.
23.
CrosbyF (1976) A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review83(2): 85–113.
24.
DaviesJ (1962) Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review, 27(1): 5–19.
25.
DiehlPFWrightTM (2016) A conditional defense of the dyadic approach. International Studies Quarterly60(2): 363–368.
26.
DubeOVargasJF (2013) Commodity price shocks and civil conflict: Evidence from Colombia. Review of Economic Studies80(4): 1384–1421.
27.
FearonJDLaitinDD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97(1): 75–90.
28.
FosterMMathesonK (1995) Double relative deprivation: Combining the personal and political. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21, 1167–1177.
29.
GlasgowGLewisPGNeimanM (2012) Local development policies and the foreclosure crisis in California. Urban Affairs Review48(1): 64–85.
30.
GuastiPBustikovaL (2019) In Europe’s closet: The rights of sexual minorities in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. East European Politics36(3). DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2019.1705282
31.
GurrT (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
GurrTR (1993) Minorities At Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. USIP.
33.
GurrTR (2015) Political Rebellion: Causes, Outcomes and Alternatives. Abingdon: Routledge.
34.
GurrTMooreWH (1997) Ethnopolitical rebellion: A cross-sectional analysis of the 1980s with risk assessments for the 1990s. American Journal of Political Science41(4): 1079–1103.
HechterMPfaffSUnderwoodP (2016) Grievances and the genesis of rebellion: Mutiny in the Royal Navy, 1740 to 1820, American Sociological Review81(1): 165–189.
37.
HewittC (1981) Catholic grievances, Catholic nationalism and violence in Northern Ireland during the civil rights period: A reconsideration. British Journal of Sociology32(3): 362–380.
38.
HoogheLBakkerRBrigevichADe VriesCEdwardsEMarksGRovnyJSteenbergenandMVachudovaM (2010) Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill Expert Surveys on Party Positioning. European Journal of Political Research49(5): 687–703.
39.
HorowitzDL (1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
HymanHH (1942) The psychology of status. Archives of Psychology, 269, 5–91. [Reprinted in HymanHSingerE (eds), Readings in Reference Group Theory and Research. New York: Free Press/London: Collier-Macmillan Limited, pp. 147–165. (Page citations are to the reprinted edition.)]
41.
IqbalZStarrH (2008) Bad neighbors: Failed states and their consequences. Conflict Management and Peace Science25: 315–331.
42.
KuhnPWeidmannN (2015) Unequal we fight: Between- and within-group inequality and ethnic civil war. Political Science Research and Methods3(3): 543–568.
43.
KusLWardCLiuJ (2014) Interethnic factors as predictors of the subjective well-being of minority individuals in a context of recent societal changes. Political Psychology35(5): 703–719.
44.
LacineB (2014) How governments shape the risk of civil violence: India’s Federal Reorganization, 1950–56. American Journal of Political Science58(3): 720–738
45.
LaitinD (2007) Nations, States and Violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
LewisPNeimanM (2007) Can “soft” data predict real outcomes?Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
47.
LindstromRMooreWH (1995) Deprived, rational, or both? Why minorities rebel revisited. Journal of Political and Military Sociology23(2): 167–190.
48.
MarshallMGGurrTRJaggersK (2010) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2009. Center for Systemic Peace.
49.
McAdamD (1982). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
McCarthyJDZaldMN (2001) The enduring vitality of the resource mobilization theory of social movements. In: TurnerJH (ed.) Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic, pp. 533–565.
51.
MerrileesCECairnsETaylorLKGoeke-MoreyMCShirlowPCummingsEM (2013) Social identity and youth aggressive and delinquent behaviors in a context of political violence. Political Psychology34(5): 695–711.
52.
MertonR (1938) Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review3(5): 672–682.
53.
MertonRKittA (1950) Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behavior. Free Press.
54.
MigdalJ (1988) Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
MiguelESatyanathSSergentiE (2004) Economic shocks and civil conflict. Journal of Political Economy112(4): 725–753.
56.
MooreWGurrT (1998) Ethnopolitical rebellion: A cross-sectional analysis of the 1980s with risk assessments for the 1990s. American Journal of Political Science41(4): 1079–1103.
57.
MooreWHGurrTR (1998) Assessing risks of ethnorebellion in the year 2000: Three empirical approaches. In: SchmeidlSAdelmanH (eds) Early Warning and Early Response. Columbia International Affairs Online, Columbia University Press.
58.
MorelliMRohnerD (2015) Resource concentration and civil wars, Journal of Development Economics117: 32–47.
59.
MuchlinskiDSirokyDSHeJKocherM (2016) Comparing random forest with logistic regression for predicting class-imbalanced civil war onset data. Political Analysis24(1): 87–103.
60.
MurshedMGatesS (2005) Spatial-horizontal inequality and the Maoist conflict in Nepal. Review of Development Economics9(1): 121–134.
61.
MustERustadSA (2019). “Mtwara will be the New Dubai”: Dashed expectations, grievances, and civil unrest in Tanzania. International Interactions45(3): 500–531.
62.
NeubergSLWarnerCMMistlerSABerlinAHillEDJohnsonJDFilip-CrawfordGMillsapREThomasGWinkelmanMBroomeBJTaylorTJSchoberJ (2014) Religion and intergroup conflict. Psychological Science25(1): 198–206.
ØstbyG (2008) Polarization, horizontal inequalities and civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research45(2): 143–162.
65.
ØstbyG (2013) Inequality and political violence: A review of the literature. International Area Studies Review16(2): 206–231.
66.
ØstbyGUrdalHZulfan TadjoeddinMMansoob MurshedSStrandH (2011) Population pressure, horizontal inequality and political violence: A disaggregated study of indonesian provinces, 1990–2003. Journal of Development Studies47(3): 377–398.
67.
PetersenR (2002) Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, Resentment in Twentieth Century Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
PettigrewTF (2002) Summing up: Relative deprivation as a key social psychological concept. In: WalkerISmithHJ (eds), Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 351–373.
69.
PoastP (2016) Dyads are dead, long live dyads! The limits of dyadic designs in international relations research. International Studies Quarterly60(2): 369–374.
70.
RauschenbachMStaerkléCScaliaD (2015) Accused for involvement in collective violence: The discursive reconstruction of agency and identity by perpetrators of international crimes. Political Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12241
71.
ReganPMNortonD (2005) Greed, grievance, and mobilization in civil wars, Journal of Conflict Resolution49(3): 319–336.
72.
RichardsonLF (1960) The Statistics of Deadly Quarrels, WrightQ (ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Boxwood Press.
73.
RuncimanWG (1966) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
74.
SambanisNMilanovicB (2014) Explaining regional autonomy differences in decentralized countries. Comparative Political Studies47(13): 1830–1855.
75.
SaxtonG (2005) Repression, grievances, mobilization, and rebellion: A new test of Gurr’s model of ethnopolitical rebellion. International Interactions31: 87–116.
76.
SimmonsE (2014) Grievances do matter in mobilization. Theory and Society43: 513–546.
77.
SirokyDCuffeJ (2015) Lost autonomy, nationalism and separatism. Comparative Political Studies48(1): 3–34.
78.
SirokyDDzutsevV (2015) The empire strikes back: Ethnicity, terrain and indiscriminate violence in counterinsurgencies. Social Science Quarterly96(3): 807–829.
79.
SirokyDSHaleCW (2017) Inside irredentism: A global analysis. American Journal of Political Science61(1): 117–128.
80.
SkocpolT (1979) States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
81.
SmithHJCroninTKesslerT (2008) Anger, fear, or sadness: Faculty members’ emotional reactions to collective pay disadvantage. Political Psychology29(2): 221–246.
82.
SmithHPettigrewTFPippinGMBialosiewiczS (2012) Relative deprivation. Personality and Social Psychology Review16: 203–232.
83.
StarrH (1978) “Opportunity” and “willingness” as ordering concepts in the study of war. International Interactions4(4): 363–387. DOI: 10.1080/03050627808434499
84.
StewartF (ed.) (2008) Horizontal Inequalities and Conflict. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
85.
StoufferSASuchmanEADeVinneyLCStarSAWilliamsRM (1949) Studies in Social Psychology in World War II: The American Soldier. Vol. 1, Adjustment During Army Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
86.
TillyC (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Random House.
87.
TurnerR (1981) Collective behavior and resource mobilization as approaches to social movements: Issues and continuities. Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change4: 1–24.
WalkerISmithHJ (eds) (2002) Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development and Integration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
90.
WeidmannN (2009) Geography as motivation and opportunity. Journal of Conflict Resolution53(4): 526–543.
91.
WimmerA (2002) Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92.
WimmerACedermanLEMinB (2009) Ethnic politics and armed conflict. American Sociological Review74(2): 316–337.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
