Land use policies and programs offer a diverse set of strategies for management of wildfire risk. Many county governments have only recently begun to implement such strategies, and relatively little research has been conducted on county activity in wildfire risk reduction such as hazard assessment, plan making, regulation of land use, and subdivision design. Based on a questionnaire survey, the authors explore influences over choice of risk reduction strategy by county governments. Our findings underscore the importance of governance variables including intergovernmental grants in development of mitigation programs.
Abt, R., M. Kuypers, and J. Whitson.1990. Perception of fire danger and wildland/urban policies after wildfire. In Fire and the environment: Ecological and cultural perspectives international symposium: proceedings, ed. S. Novdin and T. Waldrop , 257-59. Knoxville, TN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station .
2.
Altshuler, A., and M. Zegans.1990. Innovation and creativity: Comparison between public management and private enterprise. Cities, February, pp. 16-24.
3.
Berke, P.R., and T. Beatley.1992. A national assessment of local earthquake mitigation: Implications for planning and public policy. Earthquake Spectra8 (1):1-15.
4.
Berke, P., and S. French.1994. The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research13 (4): 237-50.
5.
Berry, F.S., and W.D. Berry.1999. Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In Theories of the policy process, ed. P. Sabatier.Boulder, CO: Westview.
6.
Bhandary, U., and B. Muller.2009. Land use planning and wildfire risk mitigation: An analysis of wildfire-burned subdivisions using high-resolution remote sensing imagery and GIS data. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management52 (7): 939-55.
7.
Bingham, R.D.1976. The adoption of innovation by local government. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.
8.
Booth, D.E.2002. Searching for paradise: Economic development and environmental change in the Mountain West. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9.
Brenkert-Smith, H., P.A. Champ, and N. Flores.2006. Insights into wildfire mitigation decisions among wildland-urban interface residents. Society and Natural Resources19 (8): 759-68.
10.
Bright, A.D., and R.T. Burtz.2006. Firewise activities of full-time versus seasonal residents in the wildland-urban interface. Journal of Forestry104 (6): 307-15.
11.
Bright, A.D., and P. Newman.2006. How forest context influences the acceptability of prescribed burning and mechanical thinning. In The public and wildland fire management: Social science findings for managers, ed. S. M. McCaffrey, 47-52. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-1. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
12.
Brody, S.D.2003. Are we learning to make better plans? A longitudinal analysis of plan quality associated with natural hazards. Journal of Planning Education and Research23:191-201.
13.
Brody, S.D., V. Carrasco, and W.E. Highfield.2006. Measuring the adoption of local sprawl reduction planning policies in Florida. Journal of Planning Education and Research25:294-310.
14.
Burby, R.J.2005. Have state comprehensive planning mandates reduced insured losses from natural disasters? Natural Hazards Review6 (2): 67-81.
15.
Burby, R.J., S.P. French, and B.A. Cigler.1996. Flood plain land use management: A national assessment. Studies in Water Policy and Management no. 5. Boulder, CO: Westview.
16.
Burby, R.B., and L.C. Dalton.1994. Plans can matter! The role of land use plans and state planning mandates in limiting the development of hazardous areas. Public Administration Review54 (3): 229-37.
Burby, R.J., and P. May.1997. Making governments plan: State experiments in managing land use. With P. Berke, L. Dalton, S. French, and E. Kaiser. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
Burby, R.J., and S.P. French.1981. Coping with floods: The land use management paradox. Journal of the American Planning Association47 (July): 289-300.
20.
Burby, R.J., and S.P. French.1985. Floodplain land use management: A national assessment. With B. Cigler, E. J. Kaiser, D. H. Moreau, and B. Stiftel. Boulder, CO: Westview.
21.
Cawley, R.M.1993. Federal land, western anger: The sagebrush rebellion and environmental politics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
22.
Chapin, T., R.E. Deyle, and J. Baker.2008. A parcel-based GIS method for evaluating conformance of local land-use planning with a state mandate to reduce exposure to hurricane flooding. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35 (2): 261-79.
23.
Cohen, J.D.2000. Preventing disasters: Home ignitability in the wildland-urban interface. Journal of Forestry98 (3): 15-21.
24.
Cohen, J.D.2001. Saving homes from wildfires: Regulating the home ignition zone. Zoning News, American Planning Association, May.
25.
Cook, S.1995. Wildfire at the wildland/urban interface: A survey of meso level decision makers and their support of wildfire hazard mitigation measures. Dissertation, University of Florida, Department of Geography, Gainesville.
26.
Cooperative Conservation Case Study.2008. Front range fuels treatment partnership. www.cooperativeconservationamerica.org/viewproject.asp?pid=698.
27.
Cortner, H.J., and R.D. Gale.1990. People, fire, and wildland environments . Population and Environment11 (4):245 -257.
28.
Cortner, H.J., P.D. Gardner, and J.G. Taylor.1990. Fire hazards at the urban wildland interface-What the public expects. Environmental Management14 (1): 57-62.
29.
Dennis, F.C.2003. Colorado State University Extension Services. Quickfacts reports no. 6.30: Creating wildfire-defensible zones. http://www.Ext.Colostate.Edu/Pubs/Natres/06302.html
30.
Deyle, R.E., T. Chapin, and J. Baker.2008. The proof of the planning is in the platting: An evaluation of Florida’s hurricane exposure mitigation planning mandate. Journal of the American Planning Association74 (3): 349-70.
31.
Deyle, R.E., and R.A. Smith.1998. Local government compliance with state planning mandates-The effects of state implementation in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association64 (4): 457-69.
32.
Dillman, D.2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method . New York, NY: John Wiley.
33.
Duane, T.P.1999. Shaping the Sierra. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
34.
Echeverria, J., and R. B. Eby, eds. 1995. Let the people judge: Wise use and the property rights movement. Washington, DC: Island Press.
35.
Federal Emergency Management Agency.2002. Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000-Highlights and impacts. Washington, DC: FEMA.
36.
Firewise.2002. Firewise for educators. http://www.firewise.org.
37.
Fisher, F.L.1995. Building fire safety in the wildland urban intermix: The role of building codes and fire test standards. Presented at the California/China Bilateral Conference On Fire Safety Engineering, August 14-15, Sacramento, CA.
38.
Foote, E.I.D.1994. Structure survival on the 1990 Santa Barbara Paint Fire: A retrospective study of urban-wildland interface fire hazard mitigation factors. M.S. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
39.
Frieden, B.J.1979. The environmental protection hustle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
Front Range Fuels Treatment Partnership. 2008. http://www.frftp .org/.
41.
Godschalk, D.R., D.J. Brower, and T. Beatley.1989. Catastrophic coastal storms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
42.
Goldstein, B.E., and W.H. Butler.2010. The U.S. Fire Learning Network: Providing a narrative framework for restoring ecosystems, professions and institutions . Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal . http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/08941920903012494 .
43.
Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, and R.L. Tatham.1987. Multivariate data analysis. New York, NY: Macmillan.
44.
Hansen, A., R. Rasker, B. Maxwell, J. Rotella, J. Johnson, A.W. Parmenter, U. Langner, W.B. Cohen, R.I. Lawrence, and M.V. Kraska.2002. Ecological causes and consequences of demographic change in the New West. BioScience52 (February): 151-62.
45.
Harris, M., and R. Kinney , eds. 2003. Innovation and entrepreneurship in state and local government. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
46.
Institute for Business and Home Safety.2007 . Survey of State Land Use and Natural Hazards Planning Laws , 2006. http://www.ibhs.org/publications/view.asp?id=302 .
47.
International Code Council.2006. International wildland-urban interface code. Country Club Hills, IL: International Code Council. http://www.iccsafe.org/ (accessed June 22, 2010).
48.
Jakes, P., K. Nelson, and E. Lang.2003. A model for improving community preparedness for wildfire. In Homeowners, communities, and wildfire: Science findings from the National Fire Plan. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Society and Management, ed. P. J. Jakes. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-231. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station.
49.
Manning, D.1990. Vegetative management in the wildland-urban interface . Fire Management Notes51 (4): 14-15.
50.
May, P.J., and T.A. Birkland.1994. Earthquake risk reduction: An examination of local regulatory efforts. Environmental Management18 (6): 923-37.
51.
May, P.J., and W. Williams.1986. Disaster policy implementation: Managing programs under shared governance. New York, NY: Plenum.
52.
McCaffrey, S.M.2002. For want of defensible space a forest is lost: Homeowners and the wildfire hazard and mitigation in the residential wildland intermix at Incline Village, Nevada. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53.
Mileti, D.S., and C. Fitzpatrick.1992. The causal sequence of risk communication in the Parkfield Prediction Experiment. Risk Analysis12: 393-400.
54.
Mileti, D.S., and P.W. O’Brien .1992. Warnings during disaster: Normalizing communicated risk. Social Problems39:40-57.
55.
Muller, B., and S. Schulte.2004. Wildfire mitigation and private lands: Managing long-term vulnerabilities. Presented at the Monitoring Science and Technology Symposium: Unifying Knowledge for Sustainability in the Western Hemisphere, September 20-24, Denver, CO .
56.
Muller, B., S. Schulte, and U. Bhandary.2006. Resort development and wildfire: Managing the accumulation of risks. In Mountain resort planning and development in an era of globalization, ed. Tom Clark, Alison Gill, and Rudi Hartmann.Putnam Valley, NY: Cognizant Communications.
57.
National Association of State Foresters.2004 . Preparing a community wildfire protection plan-A handbook for wildland-urban interface communities. Sponsored by Communities Committee, National Association of Counties, National Association of State Foresters, Society of American Foresters, Western Governor’s Association , March. http://www.stateforesters.org/files/cwpphandbook.pdf.
58.
National Fire Protection Association.2002 . NFPA 1144 Standard for protection of life and property from wildfire. Quincy, MA: NFPA.
59.
Nelson, A.C., and S.P. French.2002. Plan quality and mitigating damage from natural disasters: A case study of the Northridge earthquake with planning policy considerations. Journal of the American Planning Association68 (2): 194-207.
60.
Norton, R.K.2005. More and better local planning: State-mandated local planning in coastal North Carolina. Journal of the American Planning Association71 (1): 55-71.
61.
Olshansky, R.B.2001. Land use planning for seismic activity: The Los Angeles County experience, 1971-1994. Journal of the American Planning Association67 (2): 173-185.
62.
Olshansky, R.B., and J.D. Kartez.1998. Managing land use to build resilience . In Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land use planning for sustainable communities, ed. Raymond Burby.Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
63.
Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler.1992. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
64.
Ostrom, E.1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
65.
Palm, R., M. Hodgeson, R.D. Blanchard, and D. Lyons.1990. Earthquake insurance in California: Environmental policy and individual decision making. Boulder, CO: Westview.
66.
Pendall, R.2001. Municipal plans, state mandates, and property rights. Journal of Planning Education and Research21 (2): 154-65.
67.
Power, T.M.1996. Lost landscapes and failed economies: The search for a value of place. Washington, DC: Island Press.
68.
Rice, C.E., and R.E. Martin.1986. Hazard assessment for potential house loss through wildfire. In Proceedings of Intl. Union of Forest Research Organizations. Ljubljana, Yugoslavia: Intl. Union of Forest Research Organizations.
69.
Rice, C.L., and J.B. Davis.1991. Land-use planning may reduce fire damage in the urban-wildland intermix. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-127. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture.
70.
Rogers, E.M.1992. Diffusion of innovations: The challenge and the promise . In Diffusion of innovations in the public sector, ed. Glen H. Cope.Austin: University of Texas Press.
71.
Rogers, E.M.1995. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York, NY: Free Press .
72.
Rudel, T.K.1989. Situations and strategies in American land use planning . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73.
Russell, L., J.D. Goltz, and L.B. Bourque.1995. Preparedness and hazard mitigation actions before and after two earthquakes. Environment and Behavior27:744-70.
74.
Scott, T.A.1995. Prefire management along California’s wildland/ urban interface: Introduction and session overview. In Brush-fires in California’s wildlands: Ecology and resource management. Fairfield, WA: International Association of Wildland Fire.
75.
Slovic, P.1999. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis19 (4): 689-701.
76.
Steelman, T.A., G. Kunkel, and D. Bell.2004. Federal and state influence on community responses to wildfire threats: Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico. Journal of Forestry102 (6): 21-27.
77.
Steinberg, M., and R.J. Burby.2002. Growing safe. Planning68 (4): 22-23.
78.
Teaford, J.C.1997. Post-suburbia: Government and politics in the edge cities . Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
79.
Tiebout, C.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64:416-24.
80.
Tierney, K.1999. Towards a critical sociology of risk. Sociological Forum14 (2): 215-42.
81.
United States Forest Service.2010. National Database of State and Local Wildfire Hazard Mitigation Programs. http://www.wildfireprograms.com.
82.
U.S. Census Bureau.2007. Census of Government. http://www.census.gov/govs/cog/.
83.
U.S. Department of Interior.2006. Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) County Payments and Acres, 2005. http://www.nbc.gov/pilt/pilt/search.cfm#search .
84.
Vogt, C., and C.J. Stanley.2003. A changing landscape in the wildland-urban interface: Permanent and seasonal home owners, recreation and fuel management . In Proceedings of the 2002 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, ed. R. Schuster. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-302. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture , Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.
85.
Vogt, C., G. Winter, and J.S. Fried.2005. Predicting homeowners’ approval of fuel management at the wildland-urban interface using the theory of reasoned action. Society and Natural Resources18 (4): 337-354
86.
White, S.S., and M.R. Boswell.2007. Stormwater quality and local government innovation. Journal of the American Planning Association73 (2): 185-93.
87.
Whyte, A.V.T.1986. From hazard perception to human ecology, In Geography, Resources, and Environment, ed. R. W. Kates and I. Burton.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
88.
Wilson, A.A.G.1988. Width of firebreak that is necessary to stop grass fires: Some field experiments. Canadian Journal of Forestry18:682-87.
89.
Wyner, A.J., and D.E. Mann.1986. Preparing for California’s earthquakes: Local government and seismic safety. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Governmental Studies.
90.
Yoshida, Kaori, and Robert E. Deyle .2005. The determinants of small business hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards Review6 (1): 1-12.
