Using a 2013 national survey of 1,474 U.S. communities, we differentiate communities that address the needs of children and seniors in planning and zoning codes, and their impacts on the built environment at the street, neighborhood, and housing levels. Structural equation modeling results show engagement and professionalism are the most important drivers of multigenerational planning and zoning codes, and zoning has the greatest impact on built environment outcomes. Denser, larger communities are more child- and age-friendly. Rural communities and places with more seniors lag in response. Attitudes and income are not barriers to action, which gives hope for change.
AndersonJames C.GerbingDavid W. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice—A Review and Recommended 2-Step Approach.” Psychological Bulletin103 (3): 411–23. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.
5.
BagozziRichard P.YiYoujae. 2012. “Specification, Evaluation, and Interpretation of Structural Equation Models.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science40 (1): 8–34. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x.
6.
Barrington-LeighChristopherMillard-BallAdam. 2015. “A Century of Sprawl in the United States.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112 (27): 8244–9.
7.
BoarnetMarlon G.GreenwaldMichaelMcMillanTracy E. 2008. “Walking, Urban Design, and Health—Toward a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework.” Journal of Planning Education and Research27 (3): 341–58. doi:10.1177/0739456x07311073.
8.
BoundJohnBrownCharlesMathiowetzNancy. 2001. “Measurement Error in Survey Data.” Handbook of Econometrics (5):3705-843.
9.
BrodySamuel D.2003. “Measuring the Effects of Stakeholder Participation on the Quality of Local Plans Based on the Principles of Collaborative Ecosystem Management.” Journal of Planning Education and Research22 (4): 407–19. doi:10.1177/0739456x03022004007.
10.
CraneRandall. 2007. “Is There a Quiet Revolution in Women’s Travel? Revisiting the Gender Gap in Commuting.” Journal of the American Planning Association73 (3): 298–316.
11.
DeyleRobertSlotterbackCarissa Schively. 2009. “Group Learning in Participatory Planning Processes: An Exploratory Quasi-experimental Analysis of Local Mitigation Planning in Florida.” Journal of Planning Education and Research29 (1): 23–38. doi:10.1177/0739456x09333116.
12.
DriskellDavid. 2002. Creating Better Cities with Children and Youth: A Manual for Participation. Paris: UNESCO.
13.
DuanyAndresPlater-ZyberkElizabeth. 2009. Lifelong Communities: A Regional Guide to Growth and Longevity. Atlanta: Atlanta Regional Commission.
14.
EndersCraig K.BandalosDeborah L. 2001. “The Relative Performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Missing Data in Structural Equation Models.” Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary Journal8 (3): 430–57. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0803_5.
15.
FirestoneStephanieKeyesLauraGreenhouseEsther. 2018. “Planners and Aging Professionals Collaborate for Livable Communities.” Working with Older People22 (1): 20–29.
16.
FrankLawrence D.2000. “Land Use and Transportation Interaction—Implications on Public Health and Quality of Life.” Journal of Planning Education and Research20 (1): 6–22. doi:10.1177/073945600773583670.
17.
GhazalehRana AbuGreenhouseEstherHomsyGeorge C.WarnerMildred E. 2011. “Using Smart Growth and Universal Design to Link the Needs of Children and the Aging Population.” https://www.planning.org/publications/document/9148235/Accessed October 9, 2018.
18.
GlasgowNinaBrownDavid L. 2012. “Rural Ageing in the United States: Trends and Contexts.” Journal of Rural Studies28 (4): 422–31.
19.
GoetzAndrew. 2013. “Suburban Sprawl or Urban Centres: Tensions and Contradictions of Smart Growth Approaches in Denver, Colorado.” Urban Studies50 (11): 2178–95.
20.
HahnHeatherAronLaudan Y.LouCaryPrattEleanorOkoliAdaeze. 2017. Why Does Cash Welfare Depend on Where You Live?Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
HefetzAmir.WarnerMildredVigoda-GadotEran. 2014. “Professional Management and Local Government Service Delivery: Strategic Decisions across Alternative Markets.” Public Performance & Management Review38 (2): 261–83. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.983829.
23.
HirtSonia. 2013. “Home, Sweet Home: American Residential Zoning in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Planning Education and Research33 (3): 292–309. doi:10.1177/0739456x13494242.
24.
HoweDeborah. 2012. “Aging as the Foundation for Livable Communities.” In Community Livability: Issues and Approaches to Sustaining the Well-being of People and Communities, edited by WagnerFritzCavesRoger, 81–98. New York: Routledge.
25.
IsaacsJulia B.2009. How Much Do We Spend on Children and the Elderly?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26.
IsraelEvelynWarnerMildred. E. 2008. “Planning for Family Friendly Communities.” PAS Memo. Chicago: American Planning Association.
27.
JohnsonKenneth M.WinklerRichelle L. 2015. “Migration Signatures across the Decades: Net Migration by Age in U.S. Counties, 1950-2010.” Demographic Research32:1065–80.
28.
KaplanMatthewSánchezMariano. 2014. “Intergenerational Programs and Policies in Ageing Societies.” In International Handbook on Ageing and Public Policy, edited by HarperSarahHamblinKate, 367–83. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
29.
KeenanTeresa A.2010. Home and Community Preferences of the 45+ Population. Washington, DC: AARP Research & Strategic Analysis.
30.
KeyesLauraPhillipsDeborah R.SterlingEvelinaManegdegTyroneKellyMaureenTrimbleGraceMayerikCheryl. 2014. “Transforming the Way We Live Together—A Model to Move Communities from Policy to Implementation.” Journal of Aging & Social Policy26 (1/2): 117–30.
31.
KocheraAndrewStraightAudreyGuterbockThomas. 2005. Beyond 50.05: A Report to the Nation on Livable Communities-creating Environments for Successful Aging. Washington, DC: AARP.
32.
LaPlanteJohnMccannBarbara. 2008. “Complete Streets: We Can Get There from Here.” Institute of Transportation Engineers78 (5): 24–28.
33.
LehningAmanda J.2012. “City Governments and Aging in Place: Community Design, Transportation and Housing Innovation Adoption.” The Gerontologist52 (3): 345–56.
34.
LehningAmanda J.2014. “Local and Regional Governments and Age Friendly Communities: A Case Study of the San Francisco Bay Area.” Journal of Aging & Social Policy26 (1–2): 102–16.
LuiChi Wai.EveringhamJo-AnneWarburtonJeniCuthillMichaelBartlettHelen. 2009. “What Makes a Community Age Friendly: A Review of International Literature.” Australasian Journal on Ageing28 (3): 116–21.
37.
LynottJanaFox-GrageWendyGuzmanShannon. 2013. Weaving It Together: A Tapestry of Transportation Funding for Older Adults. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.
38.
MarkovichJuliaHendlerSue. 2006. “Beyond ‘Soccer Moms’ Feminist and New Urbanist Critical Approaches to Suburbs.” Journal of Planning Education and Research25 (4): 410–27.
39.
MatherMarkJacobsenLinda A.PollardKelvin M. 2015. Aging in the United States. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.
40.
McDonaldRoderick P.HoMoon-Ho Ringo. 2002. “Principles and Practice in Reporting Structural Equation Analyses.” Psychological Methods7 (1): 64–82.
41.
McKoyDeborah L.VincentJeffrey M. 2007. “Engaging Schools in Urban Revitalization: The Y-PLAN (Youth—Plan, Learn, Act, Now!).” Journal of Planning Education and Research26 (4): 389–403.
42.
MicklowAmanda C.WarnerMildred E. 2014. “Not Your Mother’s Suburb: Remaking Communities for a More Diverse Population.” The Urban Lawyer46 (4): 729–51.
43.
MilgromRichard. 2003. Sustaining Diversity: Participatory Design and the Production of Urban Space. Toronto: York University.
MyersDowell. 2007. Immigrants and Boomers: Forging a New Social Contract for the Future of America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
46.
MyersDowell. 2015. “Mutual Benefits and Equity Amid Racial Diversity: A Generational Strategy for Growing a Broader Base of Support for Social Equity.” Journal of Planning Education and Research35 (3): 369–75.
47.
N4A (National Association of Area Agencies on Aging). 2011. The Maturing of America: Communities Moving Forward for an Aging Population. Washington, DC: National Association of Area Agencies on Aging.
48.
NelsonArthur C.2009. “Catching the Next Wave: Older Adults and the ‘New Urbanism.’” Generations33 (4): 37–42.
49.
PassonCamilleLeviDanielRioVicente del. 2008. “Implications of Adolescents’ Perceptions and Values for Planning and Design.” Journal of Planning Education and Research28 (1): 73–85. doi:10.1177/0739456x08319236.
PrattEleanor E.WarnerMildred E. 2018. “Imagining the ‘Good Place’: Public Services and Family Strategies in Rural Ecuador.” Rural Sociology. Published electronically August 20. doi:10.1111/ruso.12231.
52.
PynoosJonNishitaChristyCiceroCarolineCaravielloRachel. 2008. “Aging in Place, Housing, and the Law.” Elder Law Journal16:77–107.
53.
RapinoMelanie A.CookeThomas J. 2011. “Commuting, Gender Roles, and Entrapment: A National Study Utilizing Spatial Fixed Effects and Control Groups.” The Professional Geographer63 (2): 277–94.
54.
RiggsWilliamSteinerRuth L. 2016. “The Built Environment and Walking.” In Walking: Connecting Sustainable Transport with Health, edited by MulleyCorinneGebelKlausDingDing, 139–65. Bingley: Emerald.
55.
RudnerJulie. 2012. “Public Knowing of Risk and Children’s Independent Mobility.” Progress in Planning78 (1): 1–53.
56.
RukusJosephWarnerMildred E. 2013. “Crime Rates and Collective Efficacy: The Role of Family Friendly Planning.” Cities31:37–46.
57.
RukusJosephWarnerMildred E.ZhangXue. 2018. “Community Policing: Least Effective where Need is Greatest.” Crime & Delinquency64 (14): 1858–81. doi:10.1177/0011128716686339.
58.
SevercanYucel Can. 2015a. “Planning for the Unexpected: Barriers to Young People’s Participation in Planning in Disadvantaged Communities.” International Planning Studies20 (3): 251–69.
59.
SevercanYucel Can. 2015b. “The Effects of Children’s Participation in Planning and Design Activities on Their Place Attachment.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research32 (4): 271–93.
60.
ShirgaokarManish. 2018. “Expanding Seniors’ Mobility Through Phone Apps: Potential Responses from the Private and Public Sectors.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. Published electronically April 16. doi:10.1177/0739456X18769133.
61.
SmithStanley K.RayerStefanSmithEleanor A. 2008. “Aging and Disability: Implications for the Housing Industry and Housing Policy in the United States.” Journal of the American Planning Association74 (3): 289–306.
62.
SmithStanley K.RayerStefanSmithEleanor A.WangZhenglianZengYi. 2012. “Population Aging, Disability and Housing Accessibility: Implications for Sub-national Areas in the United States.” Housing Studies27 (2): 252–66.
63.
SteinerRuth L.2012. “Does Land Use and Transportation Coordination Really Make A Difference in Creating Livable Communities?” In Community Livability: Issues and Approaches to Sustaining the Well-Being of People and Communities, edited by WagnerFritzCavesRoger, 223–48. New York: Routledge.
64.
ThiedeBrian C.BrownDavid L.SandersScott R.GlasgowNinaKulcsárLászló J. 2017. “A Demographic Deficit? Local Population Aging and Access to Services in Rural America, 1990–2010.” Rural Sociology82 (1): 44–74.
65.
UNICEF. 2004. Building Child Friendly Cities: A Framework for Action. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, International Secretariat for Child Friendly Cities. http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/416.
WagnerFritzCavesRoger, eds. 2012. Community Livability: Issues and Approaches to Sustaining the Well-being of People and Communities. New York: Routledge.
WarnerMildred E.HomsyGeorge C. 2015. “Multi-Generational Planning: Integrating the Needs of Elders and Children.” In International Perspectives on Age Friendly Cities, edited by CaroFrankFitzgeraldKelly, 227–40. New York: Routledge.
WarnerMildred E.HomsyGeorge C.MorkenLydia J. 2017. “Planning for Aging in Place: Stimulating a Market and Government Response.” Journal of Planning Education and Research37 (1): 29–42.
74.
WarnerMildred E.MorkenLydia. 2013. “Building Child and Age Friendly Communities in Tight Fiscal Times.” In The Municipal Year Book 2013, 47–56. Washington, DC: International City County Management Association.
75.
WarnerMildred E.RukusJoseph. 2013. “Planners’ Role in Creating Family-Friendly Communities: Action, Participation and Resistance.” Journal of Urban Affairs35 (5): 627–44.
76.
WarnerMildred E.XuYuanshuoMorkenLydia J. 2017. “What Explains Differences in Availability of Community Health-Related Services for Seniors in the United States?” Journal of Aging and Health29 (7): 1160–81. doi:10.1177/0898264316654675.
WoolcockGeoffSteeleWendy. 2008. Child-friendly Community Indicators– A Literature Review. Queensland, AU: Griffith University.
80.
XuYuanshuoWarnerMildred E. 2016. “Does Devolution Crowd Out Development? A Spatial Analysis of US Local Government Fiscal Effort.” Environment and Planning A48 (5): 871–90. doi:10.1177/0308518X15622448.
81.
ZhangXue.WarnerMildred E.FirestoneStephanie. 2019. “Overcoming Barriers to Livability for All Ages: Inclusivity is the Key.” Urban Planning. doi:10.17645/up.vXiX.1892
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
