The paper suggests a focused examination of the processes of drafting-based design and parametric design in urbanism. It discusses how spatial design’s settled cognition would differ by using algorithmic systems through the altered relationships between the basic operations in design. To reveal the commonalities and distinctions between the two design methods, the authors present the detailed documentation of the workshop series, which experimented with both techniques within similar design contexts. By the design analysis, the idea of “parametric thinking” is revisited in the specific context of urban design.
AicherOtl. (1991) 2015. Analogous and Digital. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
2.
AishRobertHannaSean. 2017. “Comparative Evaluation of Parametric Design Systems for Teaching Design Computation.” Design Studies52:144–72.
3.
ArcherL. Bruce. (1965) 1984. Systematic Method for Designers: Part Seven: The Final Steps. (Design 188. August 1964), 56–59. London: Council for Industrial Design.
4.
ArnheimRudolf. (1954) 1974. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
AsimowMorris. 1962. Introduction to Design. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
6.
AtilolaOlufunmilolaTomkoMeganLinseyJulie S.2016. “The Effects of Representation on Idea Generation and Design Fixation: A Study Comparing Sketches and Function Trees.” Design Studies42:110–36.
7.
BallingRichard J.TaberJohn T.BrownMichael R.DayKirsten. 1999. “Multiobjective Urban Planning Using Genetic Algorithm.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development125 (2): 86–99.
8.
BelardiPaolo. 2014. Why Architects Still Draw. Cambridge: MIT Press.
9.
Ben-JosephEran. 2005. The Code of the City: Standards and the Hidden Language of Place Making. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10.
BhooshanShajay. 2017. “Parametric Design Thinking: A Case-Study of Practice-Embedded Architectural Research.” Design Studies52:115–43.
11.
BiddulphMike. 2014. “Drawing and Thinking: Representing Place in the Practice of Place-Making.” Journal of Urban Design19 (3): 278–97.
12.
BildaZaferDemirkanHalime. 2003. “An Insight on Designers’ Sketching Activities in Traditional versus Digital Media.” Design Studies24 (1): 27–50.
CaetanoInêsSantosLuísLeitãoAntónio. 2020. “Computational Design in Architecture: Defining Parametric, Generative, and Algorithmic Design.” Frontiers of Architectural Research9 (2): 287–300.
15.
CaldasLuisa. 2006. “GENE_ARCH: An Evolution-Based Generative Design System for Sustainable Architecture.” In Workshop of the European Group for Intelligent Computing in Engineering, edited by SmithI. F. C., 109–18. Berlin: Springer.
16.
ÇalışkanOlgu. 2012. “Design Thinking in Urbanism: Learning from the Designers.” Urban Design International17 (4): 272–96.
17.
ÇalışkanOlgu. 2017. “Parametric Design in Urbanism: A Critical Reflection.” Planning Practice & Research32 (4): 417–43.
18.
CashPhilip. 2020. “Where Next for Design Research? Understanding Research Impact and Theory Building.” Design Studies68:113–41.
19.
ChaseScott C.2005. “Generative Design Tools for Novice Designers: Issues for Selection.” Automation in Construction14 (6): 689–98.
FraserIainHenmiRod. (1991) 1993. Envisioning Architecture: An Analysis of Drawing. New York: John Wiley.
32.
FrazerJohn. 2016. “Parametricism 2.0: Gearing up to Impact the Global Built Environment”. Architectural Design2 (86): 18–23.
33.
FullerR. Buckminster. 1969. Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
34.
GänshirtC.2007. Tools for Ideas: An Introduction to Architectural Design. Basel: Birkhäuser.
35.
GerberD. J.IbanezM.2014. “Parametric Tendencies and Design Agencies.” In Paradigms in Computing: Making, Machines, and Models for Design Agency in Architecture, edited by GerberDavidIbanezMariana, 387–400. Los Angeles, CA: eVolo Press.
36.
GoelVinod. 1995. Sketches of Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
37.
GoldschmidtGabriela. 1991. “The Dialectics of Sketching.” Creativity Research Journal4 (2): 123–43.
38.
GöstaAlexanderAgiAndréFlårbackJacobKarlssonJesperSimonssonEllen. 2020. “Data-Informed Urban Design: An Overview of the Use of Data and Digital Tools in Urban Planning and Design.” Built Environment46 (4): 620–36.
39.
GuKai. 2018. “Exploring Urban Morphology as Urban Design Pedagogy.” In Teaching Urban Morphology, edited by OliveiraV., 145–57. London: Springer.
HillierBillLeamanAdrian. 1974. “How Is Design Possible?” Journal of Architectural Research3:4–11.
42.
HillierBillMusgroveJohnO’SullivanPat. 1972. “Knowledge and Design.” Environmental Design: Research and Practice2:1–3.
43.
JabiWassim. 2013. Parametric Design for Architecture. London: Hachette UK.
44.
JohnsonGabeGrossMark D.HongJasonDoEllen Yi-Luen. 2009. “Computational Support for Sketching in Design: A Review.” Human-Computer Interaction2(1):1–93.
45.
KarimiKayvan. (ed.). 2012. “Evidence-Informed and Analytical Methods in Urban Design.” special issue, Urban Design International17(4).
46.
KasprisinRonPettinariJames. 1995. Visual Thinking for Architects and Designers: Visualizing Context in Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
47.
Katoshevski-CavariRachelArentzeTheo A.TimmermansHarry J. P.2011. “Sustainable City-Plan Based on Planning Algorithm, Planners’ Heuristics and Transportation Aspects.” Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences20:131–39.
48.
KavakliManolyaScrivenerStephen A. R.BallLinden J.1998. “Structure in Idea Sketching Behaviour.” Design Studies19 (4): 485–517.
LaseauPaul. (2000) 2001. Graphic Thinking for Architects and Designers. New York: John Wiley.
51.
LawsonBryan. (2010) 1980. How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Oxford: Architectural Press.
52.
LeachNeil. 2014. “There Is No Such Thing as Digital Design.” In Paradigms in Computing: Making, Machines, and Models for Design Agency in Architecture, edited by GerberD.IbanezM., 148–58, Los Angeles, CA: eVolo Press.
53.
LeszczynskiAgnieszka. 2016. “Speculative Futures: Cities, Data, and Governance beyond Smart Urbanism.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48 (9): 1691–708.
54.
LevinP. H.1966. “The Design Process in Planning: An Exploratory Study.” The Town Planning Review37 (1): 5–20.
LynFrancisDulaneyRon. 2009. “A Case for Drawing.” Enquiry the ARCC Journal for Architectural Research6 (1): 23–30.
57.
LynchKevin. 1981. Site Planning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
58.
Mapua LimReginade AzevedoLaura NovoCooperJon. 2016. “Embracing the Conceptual Shift on New Ways of Experiencing the City and Learning Urban Design: Pedagogical Methods and Digital Technologies.” Journal of Urban Design21 (5): 638–60.
59.
MarchLionel. 1976. “The Logic of Design and the Question of Value.” In The Architecture of Form, edited by MarchL., 1–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
MarkusThomas A.1969. “The Role of Building Performance Measurement and Appraisal in Design Method.” In Design Methods in Architecture, edited by BroadbentG.WardA., 109–17, London: Lund Humphries.
61.
MarshallStephen. 2011. Urban Coding and Planning. London: Routledge.
62.
MaverThomas W.1970. “Appraisal in the Building Design Process.” In Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning, edited by MooreG. T., Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
63.
McClureWendy. 2014. “Interlacing Urban Morphology and Design Studio Education: The Time Is Ripe.” Urban Morphology18 (2): 168–70.
64.
McCormackJonDorinAlanInnocentTroy. 2004. “Generative Design: A Paradigm for Design Research.” In Proceedings of Futureground, edited by DurlingD.De BonoA.RedmondJ., 156–64. Melbourne: Design Research Society.
65.
MehaffyMichael W.2008. “Generative Methods in Urban Design: A Progress Assessment.” Journal of Urbanism1 (1): 57–75.
66.
MehaffyMichael W.2011. “A City Is Not a Rhinoceros: On the Aims and Opportunities of Morphogenetic Urban Design.” Built Environment37 (4): 479–96.
67.
MeredithMichael. 2008. “Never Enough (Transform, Repeat Ad Nausea).” In From Control to Design, edited by SakamotoT.FerreA., 6–9. New York: Actar-D.
68.
MitchellW. J.1990. The Logic of Architecture: Design, Computation, and Cognition, 1998. London: MIT Press.
69.
MontgomeryJohn. 1998. “Making a City: Urbanity, Vitality and Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design3 (1): 93–116.
70.
MoroniStefanoLoriniGiuseppe. 2021. “Multiple Functions of Drawings.” Journal of Urban Design26 (3): 374–94.
71.
MoughtinCliffCuestaRafaelSarrisChristineSignorettaPaola. 1999. Urban Design: Method and Techniques. London: Routledge.
OxmanRivka. 2017. “Thinking Difference: Theories and Models of Parametric Design Thinking.” Design Studies52:4–39.
74.
PalmboomFrits. (2010) 2012. “Drawing the Ground, Layering Time.” In Drawing the Ground–Landscape Urbanism Today, edited by PalmboomF.ThomaesS.StoeckartJ.KieboomC.van PuffelenJ., 33–44. Basel: Birkhäuser.
75.
PellitteriGiuseppeLattucaRaimondoContiGiuseppeDe AmicisRaffaele. 2010. “A Generative Design System to Interactively Explore Different Urban Scenarios.” In Proceedings of the 28th eCAADe Conference, edited by SchmittG., 851–960, Zürich: Vdf Hochschulverl.
76.
PetersBrady. 2013. “Computation Works: The Building of Algorithmic Thought.” Architectural Design2 (83): 8–15.
77.
PratsMiquelEarlChris F.2006. “Exploration through Drawings in the Conceptual Stage of Product Design.” In Design Computing and Cognition ’06, 83–102. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_5.
RazzoukRimShuteValerie. 2012. “What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?” Review of Educational Research82 (3): 330–48.
80.
ReasCaseyMcWilliamsChandler. 2010. Form + Code in Design, Art, and Architecture. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
81.
RittelHorst W. J.WebberMelvin M.1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences4 (2): 155–69.
82.
RowePeter G.2017. Design Thinking in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Graduate School of Design.
83.
SchnabelMarc Aurel. 2008. “Parametric Design in Urban Design.” In Proceedings of the 12th ICCCBE-XII & INCITE, edited by RenA.MaZ.LuZ.16–18. Beijing: Tingshua University Press.
84.
SchönDonald A. 1983. “The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.” Aldershot: Avebury.
85.
SchönDonald A.WigginsGlenn. 1992. “Kinds of Seeing and Their Functions in Designing.” Design Studies13 (2): 135–56.
86.
SchumacherPatrik. 2009. “Parametricism: A New Global Style for Architecture and Urban Design.” Architectural Design79 (4): 14–23.
87.
SchumacherPatrik. 2011. The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Vol. I: A New Framework for Architecture (Vol. 1). New York: John Wiley.
88.
SchumacherPatrik. 2016. “Parametricism 2.0: Gearing up to Impact the Global Built Environment.” Architectural Design2 (86): 8–17.
ShirvaniHamid. 1985. The Urban Design Process. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
92.
SlaterTerry. 2014. “Introducing Urban Morphology to Large Undergraduate Classes through Project-Based Teaching.” In New Urban Configurations, edited by CavalloR.KomossaS.MarzotN.KuijperJ.PonM. B., 137–42. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
93.
SperanzaPhilip. 2016. “Using Parametric Methods to Understand Place in Urban Design Courses.” Journal of Urban Design21 (5): 661–89.
94.
SteinøNicolaiBenbihKarimaObelingEsben. 2013. “Using Parametrics to Facilitate Collaborative Urban Design: An Attempt to Overcome Some Inherent Dilemmas.” Planum: The Journal of Urbanism26 (1): 1–13.
95.
SteinøNicolaiVeirumN. Einar. 2005. “A Parametric Approach to Urban Design Tentative Formulations of a Methodology.” In eCAADe Portugal conference proceedings, digital design: The quest for new paradigms, edited by DuarteJ. P.Ducla-SoaresG.Zita SampaioA., 679–86. Lisbon.
96.
StempfleJoachimBadke-SchaubPetra. 2002. “Thinking in Design Teams—An Analysis of Team Communication.” Design Studies23 (5): 473–96.
97.
TalenEmily. 2012. City Rules: How Regulations Affect Urban Form. Washington, DC: Island Press.
TrummerPeter. 2011. “Associative Design: From Type to Population.” In Computational Design Thinking, edited by MengesA.AhlquistS., 94–101. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
104.
TurkieniczBenamyGonçalvesBárbara BellaverGrazziotinPablo. 2008. “CityZoom: A Visualization Tool for the Assessment of Planning Regulations.” International Journal of Architectural Computing6 (1): 79–95.
105.
UllmanDavid G.WoodStephenCraigDavid. 1990. “The Importance of Drawing in the Mechanical Design Process.” Computers & Graphics14 (2): 263–74.
106.
Van der ZeeA.de VriesB.2008. “Design by Computation.” In GA2008 the 11th Generative Art Conference, edited by SodduC., 35–37. Milan.
107.
VerebesTom. 2014. Masterplanning the Adaptive City: Computational Urbanism in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Routledge.
108.
VerebesTom. 2015. “Cities and Their Specificities: Standards, Customs and the Making of 21st-Century Urbanity.” Architectural Design6 (85): 8–17.
WestWilliam. 2001. “Beyond Grounded Theory: The Use of a Heuristic Approach to Qualitative Research.” Counselling and Psychotherapy Research1 (2): 126–31.
111.
WortmannThomasTunçerBige. 2017. “Differentiating Parametric Design: Digital Workflows in Contemporary Architecture and Construction.” Design Studies52:173–97.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
