Abstract
Land use plans, a crucial component of statutory master plans, are often deemed failures. To test this hypothesis, an ex-post evaluation of seven master plans from five Indian million-plus cities was conducted using percentage implementation (PI) and conformance variation (CV) as evaluation factors to ascertain variation between proposed and subsequent existing land uses. Contrary to master plans, a significant difference in CV was observed among land uses after performing analysis of variance (ANOVA) across all master plans and land use categories. Post hoc tests revealed that residential, governmental/public and semi-public, industrial, and overall developed/urbanized areas grew relatively as expected compared to recreational use.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
