During the Covid-19 pandemic, provisional infrastructure was implemented to support active transportation. However, the planning community still requires deeper understandings of the relationships between provisional infrastructure and mobility. We use the example of a roadway closure in Philadelphia to investigate how one active mode—bikeshare use—changed in response to provisional infrastructure. We employ differences-in-differences models that measure the semi-causal effect of provisional infrastructure on bikeshare trip durations and find that even during the pandemic, when trip durations increased across the bikeshare system, provisional infrastructure had an additive and statistically discernible impact above and beyond the pandemic effect.
AldredRachel. 2013. “Incompetent or too Competent? Negotiating Everyday Cycling Identities in a Motor Dominated Society.” Mobilities8 (2): 252–71. doi:10.1080/17450101.2012.696342.
2.
AldredRachelElliottBridgetWoodcockJamesGoodmanAnna. 2017. “Cycling Provision Separated from Motor Traffic: A Systematic Review Exploring Whether Stated Preferences Vary by Gender and Age.” Transport Reviews37 (1): 29–55. doi:10.1080/01441647.2016.1200156.
3.
AnBrian Y.2024. “Self-Organizing Special Districts: A Tool for Community Change and Development.” Journal of Planning Education and Research44 (3): 1347–66. doi:10.1177/0739456X211065496.
4.
AngelAvitalCohenAchituvDalyotSagiPlautPnina. 2023. “Impact of COVID-19 Policies on Pedestrian Traffic and Walking Patterns.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science50 (5): 1178–93. doi:10.1177/23998083221113332.
5.
AngristJoshua DavidPischkeJörn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6.
BagdatliMuhammed Emin CihangirIpekFatima. 2022. “Transport Mode Preferences of University Students in Post-COVID-19 Pandemic.” Transport Policy118 (March): 20–32. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.01.017.
7.
BeckerSophiavon SchneidemesserDirkCaseiroAlexandreGöttingKatharinaSchmitzSeánvon SchneidemesserErika. 2022. “Pop-up Cycling Infrastructure as a Niche Innovation for Sustainable Transportation in European Cities: An Inter- and Transdisciplinary Case Study of Berlin.” Sustainable Cities and Society87 (December): 104168. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.104168.
8.
BillsTierra S.WalkerJoan L.. 2017. “Looking beyond the Mean for Equity Analysis: Examining Distributional Impacts of Transportation Improvements.” Transport Policy54 (February): 61–69. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.003.
9.
BrathwaiteTimothyWalkerJoan L.. 2018. “Causal Inference in Travel Demand Modeling (and the Lack Thereof).” Journal of Choice Modelling26 (March): 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2017.12.001.
10.
BroachJ.DillJ.GliebeJ.. 2012. “Where Do Cyclists Ride? A Route Choice Model Developed with Revealed Preference GPS Data.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice46 (10): 1730–40. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.07.005.
11.
BuckDarrenBuehlerRalphHappPatriciaRawlsBradleyChungPaytonBoreckiNatalie. 2013. “Are Bikeshare Users Different from Regular Cyclists? A First Look at Short-Term Users, Annual Members, and Area Cyclists in the Washington, D.C., Region.” Transportation Research Record2387 (1): 112–19. doi:10.3141/2387-13.
12.
BuehlerRalphPucherJohn. 2021. “COVID-19 Impacts on Cycling, 2019–2020.” Transport Reviews41 (4): 393–400. doi:10.1080/01441647.2021.1914900.
13.
BuehlerRalphPucherJohn. 2022. “Cycling through the COVID-19 Pandemic to a More Sustainable Transport Future: Evidence from Case Studies of 14 Large Bicycle-Friendly Cities in Europe and North America.” Sustainability14 (12): 7293. doi:10.3390/su14127293.
14.
BuehlerRalphPucherJohn. 2024. “COVID-19 and Cycling: A Review of the Literature on Changes in Cycling Levels and Government Policies from 2019 to 2022.” Transport Reviews44 (2): 299–344. doi:10.1080/01441647.2023.2205178.
15.
CaspiOrNolandRobert B.. 2019. “Bikesharing in Philadelphia: Do Lower-Income Areas Generate Trips?” Travel Behaviour and Society16 (July): 143–52. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2019.05.004.
16.
CerveroRobertSarmientoOlga L.JacobyEnriqueGomezLuis FernandoNeimanAndrea. 2009. “Influences of Built Environments on Walking and Cycling: Lessons from Bogotá.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation3 (4): 203–26. doi:10.1080/15568310802178314.
17.
ChenLiChenCynthiaSrinivasanRaghavanMcKnightClaire E.EwingReidRoeMatthew. 2012. “Evaluating the Safety Effects of Bicycle Lanes in New York City.” American Journal of Public Health102 (6): 1120–27. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300319.
18.
ChenPeng. 2015. “Built Environment Factors in Explaining the Automobile-Involved Bicycle Crash Frequencies: A Spatial Statistic Approach.” Safety Science79 (November): 336–43. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.016.
19.
ChenXiaoPeiTaoSongCiShuHuaGuoSihuiWangXiLiuYaxiChenJieZhouChenghu. 2022. “Accessing Public Transportation Service Coverage by Walking Accessibility to Public Transportation under Flow Buffering.” Cities125 (June): 103646. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2022.103646.
20.
CicchinoJessica B.McCarthyMelissa L.NewgardCraig D.WallStephen P.DiMaggioCharles J.KuliePaige E.ArnoldBrittany N.ZubyDavid S.. 2020. “Not All Protected Bike Lanes Are the Same: Infrastructure and Risk of Cyclist Collisions and Falls Leading to Emergency Department Visits in Three U.S. Cities.” Accident Analysis & Prevention141 (June): 105490. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105490.
21.
CicchinoJessica B.McCarthyMelissa L.NewgardCraig D.WallStephen P.DiMaggioCharles J.KuliePaige E.ArnoldBrittney E.ZubyDavid S.. 2019. Not All Protected Bike Lanes Are the Same: Infrastructure and Risk of Cyclist Collisions and Falls Leading to Emergency Department Visits in Three U.S. Cities. Arlington, VA: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
CraneMelanieRisselChrisStandenChrisEllisonAdrianEllisonRichardWenLi MingGreavesStephen. 2017. “Longitudinal Evaluation of Travel and Health Outcomes in Relation to New Bicycle Infrastructure, Sydney, Australia.” Journal of Transport & Health6 (September): 386–95. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2017.07.002.
24.
DaiFangzhouDiaoMiSingTien Foo. 2024. “A Two-Dimensional Propensity Score Matching Approach to Estimating the Treatment Effect of Urban Rail Transit Lines on Vehicle Travel.” Transportation51 (3): 853–73. doi:10.1007/s11116-022-10360-2.
25.
DavidsonJoshua H.2023. “A Socio-Spatial Approach to Define Priority Areas for Bicycle Infrastructure Using Covid-19 Data.” Sustainable Cities and Society99 (December): 104883. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2023.104883.
26.
DavidsonJoshua H.NamStephanie J.KaramShriyaKoromaFatima K.KimEllie M.RyersonMegan S.. 2022. “New Equity Inputs to Prioritize Bikeshare Infrastructure Allocation: Learning From the COVID-19 Period.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2678: 167–81. doi:10.1177/03611981221098390.
27.
DesjardinsEliseHigginsChristopher D.PáezAntonio. 2022. “Examining Equity in Accessibility to Bike Share: A Balanced Floating Catchment Area Approach.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment102 (January): 103091. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2021.103091.
28.
DillJenniferMcNeilNathanBroachJosephMaLiang. 2014. “Bicycle Boulevards and Changes in Physical Activity and Active Transportation: Findings from a Natural Experiment.” Preventive Medicine, Supplement: Active Living Research—Niche to Norm69 (December): S74–S78. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.006.
29.
DingChuanCaoXinyu. 2019. “How Does the Built Environment at Residential and Work Locations Affect Car Ownership? An Application of Cross-Classified Multilevel Model.” Journal of Transport Geography75 (February): 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.01.012.
30.
FischerJaimyNelsonTrisalynWintersMeghan. 2022. “Riding through the Pandemic: Using Strava Data to Monitor the Impacts of COVID-19 on Spatial Patterns of Bicycling.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives15 (September): 100667. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2022.100667.
31.
FishmanElliot. 2016. “Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature.” Transport Reviews36 (1): 92–113. doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1033036.
32.
FishmanElliot. 2020. Bike Share. New York: Routledge.
33.
FosterNickMonsereChristopher M.DillJenniferCliftonKelly. 2015. “Level-of-Service Model for Protected Bike Lanes.” Transportation Research Record2520 (1): 90–99. doi:10.3141/2520-11.
34.
FullerDanielGauvinLiseKestensYanDanielMarkFournierMichelMorencyPatrickDrouinLouis. 2013. “Impact Evaluation of a Public Bicycle Share Program on Cycling: A Case Example of BIXI in Montreal, Quebec.” American Journal of Public Health103 (3): e85–e92. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300917.
35.
FurthPeter G.2012. “Bicycling Infrastructure for Mass Cycling: A Trans-Atlantic Comparison.” In City Cycling, edited by PucherJohnBuehlerRalph, 105–40. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
FurthPeter G.2021. “Bicycling Infrastructure for All.” In Cycling for Sustainable Cities, edited by BuehlerRalphPucherJohn, 81–102. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
GarrardJanHandySusan L.DillJennifer. 2012. “Women and Cycling.” In City Cycling, edited by PucherJohnBuehlerRalph, 197–218. Urban and Industrial Environments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
GarrardJanRoseGeoffreyLoSing Kai. 2008. “Promoting Transportation Cycling for Women: The Role of Bicycle Infrastructure.” Preventive Medicine46 (1): 55–59. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.010.
39.
GiurgeLaura M.WhillansAshley V.WestColin. 2020. “Why Time Poverty Matters for Individuals, Organisations and Nations.” Nature Human Behaviour4 (10): 993–1003. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0920-z.
40.
GuerraErickCerveroRobertTischlerDaniel. 2012. “Half-Mile Circle: Does It Best Represent Transit Station Catchments?” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2276 (1): 101–109. doi:10.3141/2276-12.
41.
GuerraErickZhangHeHassallLukeWangJialinCheyetteAnna. 2020. “Who Cycles to Work and Where? A Comparative Multilevel Analysis of Urban Commuters in the US and Mexico.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment87 (October): 102554. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102554.
42.
HabibMuhammad AhsanulAnikMd Asif Hasan. 2023. “Impacts of COVID-19 on Transport Modes and Mobility Behavior: Analysis of Public Discourse in Twitter.” Transportation Research Record2677 (4): 65–78. doi:10.1177/03611981211029926.
43.
HaghaniMiladMerkertRicoBehnoodAliDe GruyterChrisKazemzadehKhashayarGhaderiHadiShahhoseiniZahra, et al2024. “How COVID-19 Transformed the Landscape of Transportation Research: An Integrative Scoping Review and Roadmap for Future Research.” Transportation Letters16 (1): 43–88. doi:10.1080/19427867.2022.2160294.
44.
HarrisMikeMcCuePeter. 2022. “Pop-Up Cycleways.” Journal of the American Planning Association89 (2): 240–52. doi:10.1080/01944363.2022.2061578.
45.
HeckertMeganMennisJeremy. 2012. “The Economic Impact of Greening Urban Vacant Land: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Analysis.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space44 (12): 3010–27. doi:10.1068/a4595.
46.
HeeschKristiann C.JamesBruceWashingtonTracy L.ZunigaKellyBurkeMatthew. 2016. “Evaluation of the Veloway 1: A Natural Experiment of New Bicycle Infrastructure in Brisbane, Australia.” Journal of Transport & Health3 (3): 366–76. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2016.06.006.
47.
HeydariShahramKonstantinoudisGaryfallosBehsoodiAbdul Wahid. 2021. “Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Bike-Sharing Demand and Hire Time: Evidence from Santander Cycles in London.” PLOS ONE16 (12): e0260969. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260969.
HullAngelaO’HolleranCraig. 2014. “Bicycle Infrastructure: Can Good Design Encourage Cycling?” Urban, Planning and Transport Research2 (1): 369–406. doi:10.1080/21650020.2014.955210.
50.
KarArmitaLeHuyen T. K.MillerHarvey J.. 2022. “What Is Essential Travel? Socioeconomic Differences in Travel Demand in Columbus, Ohio, during the COVID-19 Lockdown.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers112 (4): 1023–46. doi:10.1080/24694452.2021.1956876.
51.
KasserTimSheldonKennon M.. 2009. “Time Affluence as a Path toward Personal Happiness and Ethical Business Practice: Empirical Evidence from Four Studies.” Journal of Business Ethics84 (2): 243–55. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9696-1.
52.
KatrakazasChristosMichelarakiEvaSekadakisMariosZiakopoulosApostolosKontaxiArmiraYannisGeorge. 2021. “Identifying the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Driving Behavior Using Naturalistic Driving Data and Time Series Forecasting.” Journal of Safety Research78 (September): 189–202. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2021.04.007.
53.
KoglinTillRyeTom. 2014. “The Marginalisation of Bicycling in Modernist Urban Transport Planning.” Journal of Transport & Health1 (4): 214–22. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2014.09.006.
54.
KrausSebastianKochNicolas. 2021. “Provisional COVID-19 Infrastructure Induces Large, Rapid Increases in Cycling.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118 (15): e2024399118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2024399118.
55.
LaMondiaJeffreyMcGheeJacobFisherMitchellCorderoFernando. 2019. “Evaluating the Safety and Behavioral Impacts of Green Bike Lanes in Suburban Communities.” Transportation Research Record2673 (11): 671–79. doi:10.1177/0361198119855605.
56.
LavioletteJérômeMorencyCatherineWaygoodE. O. D.. 2022. “A Kilometer or a Mile? Does Buffer Size Matter When It Comes to Car Ownership?” Journal of Transport Geography104 (October): 103456. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103456.
57.
LeeChanamNewmanGalenJourdanDawnYeXinyueVan ZandtShannon. 2022. “Natural Experiments in Planning Research.” Journal of Planning Education and Research42 (1): 6–8. doi:10.1177/0739456X211061763.
58.
LiuChengchengZhangWenjia. 2023. “Social and Spatial Heterogeneities in COVID-19 Impacts on Individual’s Metro Use: A Big-Data Driven Causality Inference.” Applied Geography155 (June): 102947. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102947.
59.
LovelaceRobinTalbotJosephMorganMalcolmLucas-SmithMartin. 2020. “Methods to Prioritise Pop-up Active Transport Infrastructure.” Transport Findings. doi:10.32866/001c.13421.
60.
MadsenThomasSchipperijnJasperChristiansenLars BreumNielsenThomas SickTroelsenJens. 2014. “Developing Suitable Buffers to Capture Transport Cycling Behavior.” Frontiers in Public Health2 (June): 61. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2014.00061.
61.
McAndrewsCarolynMarcusJustine. 2014. “Community-Based Advocacy at the Intersection of Public Health and Transportation: The Challenges of Addressing Local Health Impacts within a Regional Policy Process.” Journal of Planning Education and Research34 (2): 190–202. doi:10.1177/0739456X14531624.
62.
McNeilNathanMonsereChristopher M.DillJennifer. 2015. “Influence of Bike Lane Buffer Types on Perceived Comfort and Safety of Bicyclists and Potential Bicyclists.” Transportation Research Record2520 (1): 132–42. doi:10.3141/2520-15.
63.
MenghiniG.CarrascoN.SchüsslerN.AxhausenK. W.. 2010. “Route Choice of Cyclists in Zurich.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice44 (9): 754–65. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2010.07.008.
64.
MölenbergFamke J. M.PanterJennaBurdorfAlexvan LentheFrank J.. 2019. “A Systematic Review of the Effect of Infrastructural Interventions to Promote Cycling: Strengthening Causal Inference from Observational Data.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity16 (1): 93. doi:10.1186/s12966-019-0850-1.
65.
MonsereChristopher M.McNeilNathan W.SandersRebecca L.. 2020. “User-Rated Comfort and Preference of Separated Bike Lane Intersection Designs.” Transportation Research Record2674 (9): 216–29. doi:10.1177/0361198120927694.
66.
MoudonAnne VernezLeeChanam. 2003. “Walking and Bicycling: An Evaluation of Environmental Audit Instruments.” American Journal of Health Promotion18 (1): 21–37. doi:10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.21.
67.
NelsonTrisalynRoyAvipsaFersterColinFischerJaimyBrum-BastosVanessaLabereeKarenYuHanchenWintersMeghan. 2021. “Generalized Model for Mapping Bicycle Ridership with Crowdsourced Data.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies125 (April): 102981. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.102981.
68.
Nguemeni TiakoMax JordanStokesDaniel C.. 2021. “Who Is Biking for? Urban Bikeshare Networks’ Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic, Disparities in Bikeshare Access, and a Way Forward.” The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine94 (1): 159–64.
69.
NikitasAlexandrosTsigdinosStefanosKarolemeasChristosKourmpaEfthymiaBakogiannisEfthimios. 2021. “Cycling in the Era of COVID-19: Lessons Learnt and Best Practice Policy Recommendations for a More Bike-Centric Future.” Sustainability13 (9): 4620. doi:10.3390/su13094620.
70.
NiuCaichengZhangWenjia. 2023. “Causal Effects of Mobility Intervention Policies on Intracity Flows during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Moderating Role of Zonal Locations in the Transportation Networks.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems102 (June): 101957. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2023.101957.
71.
PadmanabhanVyasPenmetsaPraveenaLiXiaobingDhondiaFatemaDhondiaSakinaParrishAllen. 2021. “COVID-19 Effects on Shared-Biking in New York, Boston, and Chicago.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives9 (March): 100282. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100282.
72.
ParkYujinAkarGulsah. 2019. “Why Do Bicyclists Take Detours? A Multilevel Regression Model Using Smartphone GPS Data.” Journal of Transport Geography74 (January): 191–200. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.013.
73.
ParkerKathryn M.GustatJeanetteRiceJanet C.. 2011. “Installation of Bicycle Lanes and Increased Ridership in an Urban, Mixed-Income Setting in New Orleans, Louisiana.” Journal of Physical Activity & Health8 (Suppl. 1): S98–S102. doi:10.1123/jpah.8.s1.s98.
74.
ParkerKathryn M.RiceJanetGustatJeanetteRuleyJenniferSpriggsAubreyJohnsonCarolyn. 2013. “Effect of Bike Lane Infrastructure Improvements on Ridership in One New Orleans Neighborhood.” Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine45 (Suppl. 1): S101–S107. doi:10.1007/s12160-012-9440-z.
75.
PrinsR. G.PierikF.EtmanA.SterkenburgR. P.KamphuisC. B. M.van LentheF. J.. 2014. “How Many Walking and Cycling Trips Made by Elderly Are beyond Commonly Used Buffer Sizes: Results from a GPS Study.” Health & Place27 (May): 127–33. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.01.012.
76.
PritchardRayBucherDominikFrøyenYngve. 2019. “Does New Bicycle Infrastructure Result in New or Rerouted Bicyclists? A Longitudinal GPS Study in Oslo.” Journal of Transport Geography77 (May): 113–25. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.05.005.
77.
PucherJohnBuehlerRalph. 2008. “Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany.” Transport Reviews28 (4): 495–528. doi:10.1080/01441640701806612.
78.
PucherJohnBuehlerRalphSeinenMark. 2011. “Bicycling Renaissance in North America? An Update and Re-Appraisal of Cycling Trends and Policies.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice45 (6): 451–75. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.03.001.
79.
PucherJohnDillJenniferHandySusan. 2010. “Infrastructure, Programs, and Policies to Increase Bicycling: An International Review.” Preventive Medicine50 (January): S106–S125. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.028.
RératPatrickHaldimannLucasWidmerHannah. 2022. “Cycling in the Era of Covid-19: The Effects of the Pandemic and Pop-up Cycle Lanes on Cycling Practices.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives15 (September): 100677. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2022.100677.
SandersRebecca L.2016. “We Can All Get along: The Alignment of Driver and Bicyclist Roadway Design Preferences in the San Francisco Bay Area.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice91 (September): 120–33. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.002.
84.
SchmitzSeánCaseiroAlexandreKerschbaumerAndreasvon SchneidemesserErika. 2021. “Do New Bike Lanes Impact Air Pollution Exposure for Cyclists? A Case Study from Berlin.” Environmental Research Letters16 (8): 084031. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac1379.
85.
ShadishWilliam R.CookThomas D.CampbellDonald T.. 2001. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
86.
SmithH.SadeghpourF.. 2022. “The Influence of Socioeconomic Variables on Cycling Infrastructure Preferences in Calgary.” In Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021, edited by WalbridgeScottNik-BakhtMazdakNgKelvin Tsun WaiShomeManasAlamM. ShahriaDamattyAshraf ElLovegroveGordon, 663–75. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-1065-4_55.
87.
SongYenaPrestonJohnOgilvieDavid. 2017. “New Walking and Cycling Infrastructure and Modal Shift in the UK: A Quasi-Experimental Panel Study.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice95 (January): 320–33. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.017.
88.
SundstromCarl A.QuinnSean M.WeldRoger. 2019. “Bicyclist Crash Comparison of Mixing Zone and Fully Split Phase Signal Treatments at Intersections with Protected Bicycle Lanes in New York City.” Transportation Research Record2673 (12): 115–24. doi:10.1177/0361198119859301.
89.
SungHyungun. 2023. “Causal Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Daily Ridership of Public Bicycle Sharing in Seoul.” Sustainable Cities and Society89 (February): 104344. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.104344.
90.
TokeyAhmad Ilderim. 2020. “Change of Bike-Share Usage in Five Cities of United States during COVID-19.” Findings, November. doi:10.32866/001c.17851.
91.
WangHaoyunNolandRobert B.. 2021a. “Bikeshare and Subway Ridership Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City.” Transport Policy106 (June): 262–70. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.04.004.
92.
WangHaoyunNolandRobert B.. 2021b. “Changes in the Pattern of Bikeshare Usage Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Findings, January. doi:10.32866/001c.18728.
93.
WangJueyuLindseyGreg. 2019. “Neighborhood Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Bike Share Member Patterns of Use.” Journal of Transport Geography79 (July): 102475. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102475.
94.
WhitehurstDavid G. T.DeVriesDanielle N.FullerDanielWintersMeghan. 2021. “An Economic Analysis of the Health-Related Benefits Associated with Bicycle Infrastructure Investment in Three Canadian Cities.” PLOS ONE16 (2): e0246419. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246419.
95.
WintersMeghanBranion-CallesMichaelTherrienSuzanneFullerDanielGauvinLiseWhitehurstDavid G. TNelsonTrisalyn. 2018. “Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): Protocol for a Natural Experiment Study in Three Canadian Cities.” BMJ Open8 (1): e019130. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019130.
96.
WintersMeghanFriesenMelissa C.KoehoornMiekeTeschkeKay. 2007. “Utilitarian Bicycling.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine32 (1): 52–58. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.027.
97.
WintersMeghanTeschkeKayGrantMichaelSettonEleanor M.BrauerMichael. 2010. “How Far Out of the Way Will We Travel? Built Environment Influences on Route Selection for Bicycle and Car Travel.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2190 (1): 1–10. doi:10.3141/2190-01.
98.
WoronkowiczJoanna. 2016. “Art-Making or Place-Making? The Relationship between Open-Air Performance Venues and Neighborhood Change.” Journal of Planning Education and Research36 (1): 49–59. doi:10.1177/0739456X15597759.
99.
YounesHannahNolandRobert B.Von HagenLeigh AnnSinclairJames. 2023. “Cycling during and after COVID: Has There Been a Boom in Activity?” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour99 (November): 71–82. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2023.09.017.
100.
ZahranSammyBrodySamuel D.MaghelalPraveenPrelogAndrewLacyMichael. 2008. “Cycling and Walking: Explaining the Spatial Distribution of Healthy Modes of Transportation in the United States.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment13 (7): 462–70. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2008.08.001.
101.
ZhangYunchangFrickerJon D.. 2021. “Quantifying the Impact of COVID-19 on Non-Motorized Transportation: A Bayesian Structural Time Series Model.” Transport Policy103 (March): 11–20. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.013.
