Investigative reporting identifies social problems and names people in power who should be held accountable. Solutions journalism is an evidence-based reporting approach that covers credible responses to social problems. To consider these reporting approaches in tandem, this research uses a quantitative content analysis to examine both investigative and solutions reporting in an effort to determine to what extent a combined reporting approach of these two genres may already exist in journalistic practice.
AbdenourJ. (2017). Inspecting the investigators: An analysis of television investigative journalism and factors leading to its production. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95, 1058-1078. doi:10.1177/1077699017733438
2.
AbdenourJ.McIntyreK.DahmenN. S. (2017). Putting broadcast news in context: An analysis of U.S. television journalists’ role conceptions and contextual values. Electronic News, 12, 179-193.
BeneschS. (1998). The rise of solutions journalism. Columbia Journalism Review, 36(6), 36-39.
6.
BethuneS.LewanE. (2017, November1). APA stress in America™ survey: US at “lowest point we can remember”; Future of nation most commonly reported source of stress. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2017/11/lowest-point.aspx
DyerJ. (2015). Solutions journalism: Solutions journalism focuses on what’s going right in the world rather than what’s going wrong. Nieman Reports, 69(2), 14-17.
12.
FinkK.SchudsonM. (2014). The rise of contextual journalism, 1950s–2000s. Journalism, 15(1), 3-20.
13.
GainesW. C. (2008). Investigative journalism: Proven strategies for reporting the story. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
14.
HamiltonJ. (2016). Democracy’s detectives: The economics of investigative journalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
HoustonB. (2009). The investigative reporter’s handbook: A guide to documents, databases and techniques. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
16.
JohnstoneJ. W.SlawskiE. J.BowmanW. W. (1972). The professional values of American newsmen. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 522-540.
17.
KimK. H.MeyerP. (2005). Survey yields five factors of newspaper quality. Newspaper Research Journal, 26(1), 6-15.
18.
KovachB.RosenstielT. (2007). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
19.
KrippendorffK. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
20.
LoughK.McIntyreK. (2018). Visualizing the solution: An analysis of the images that accompany solutions-oriented news stories. Journalism, 95, 971-989. doi:10.1177/1464884918770553
McIntyreK. (2019). Solutions journalism: The effects of including solution information in news stories about social problems. Journalism Practice, 13, 16-34. doi:10.1080/17512786.2017.1409647
23.
McIntyreK.DahmenN. S.AbdenourJ. (2018). The contextualist function: US newspaper journalists value social responsibility. Journalism, 19, 1657-1675.
24.
McIntyreK.LoughK.ManzanaresK. (2018). Solutions in the shadows: The effects of photo and text congruency in solutions journalism news stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95, 971-989.
25.
NeuendorfK. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
ThierK. (2016). Opportunities and challenges for initial implementation of solutions journalism coursework. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 71, 329-343.
