Traditionally, research in both adult education and social work fields have focused on cognitive ways of knowing. Although both disciplines have acknowledged other ways of knowing, there has been minimal focus on noncognitive ways of knowing, including embodied knowing. The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand how social workers incorporated embodied knowing into their social work practice. Ten social workers from a variety of settings were interviewed to understand how they learned to trust their bodies as a site of knowing and integrate embodied knowing into their social work practices. Using a feminist theoretical framework, findings indicated that participants embraced and trusted their embodied knowing as a valid source of knowledge. Participants identified internal reactions in social work interactions and described how they processed these somatic sensations to guide their practices. Implications for social work practitioners and social work and adult educators are discussed.
BarnacleR. (2009). Gut instinct: The body and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41, 22-33.
2.
BarrettL. F. (2006). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 20-46.
3.
BelenkyM. F.ClinchyB. M.GoldbergerN. R.TaruleJ. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
4.
BennerP.TannerC. (1987). Clinical judgment: How expert nurses use intuition. American Journal of Nursing, 87, 23-31.
5.
BermanM. (1981). The reenchantment of the world. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6.
BermanM. (1989). Coming to our senses: Body and spirit in the hidden history of the West. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
7.
BordoS. (1986). The Cartesian masculinization of thought. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11, 439-456.
8.
BoydE. M.FalesA. W. (1983). Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23, 99-117.
9.
BrookfieldS. D. (1988). Critically reflective practice. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 18, 162-184.
10.
CaffarellaR. S.MerriamS. B. (2000). Linking the individual learner to the context of adult learning. In WilsonA. L.HayesE. (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 55-70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
ClarkM. C. (2001). Off the beaten path: Some creative approaches to adult learning. In MerriamS. B. (Ed.), New update on adult learning theory (pp. 83-91). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
CrowdesM. S. (2000). Embodying sociological imagination: Pedagogical support for linking bodies to minds. Teaching Sociology, 28, 24-40.
13.
DirkxJ. M. (2001). The power of feelings: Emotion, imagination, and the construction of meaning in adult learning. In MerriamS. B. (Ed.), New update on adult learning theory (pp. 63-72). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
DirubboP. L. (1995). Exploring women’s experience of body in intentional adult learning: Where’s my body when my mind’s in school? (eros). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(1), 478. (UMI No. 9613174)
15.
EberM.KunzL. B. (1984). The desire to help others. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 48, 125-140.
16.
EzzyD. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. London, England: Routledge.
17.
FenwickT. J. (2000). Expanding conceptions of experiential learning: A review of the five contemporary perspectives on cognition. Adult Education Quarterly, 50, 243-272.
18.
FenwickT. J. (2003). Reclaiming and re-embodying experiential learning through complexity science. Studies in the Education of Adults35(2), 123-141.
19.
FreilerT. J. (2008). Learning through the body. In MerriamS. B. (Ed.), New directions for adult and continuing education (Vol. 119, pp. 37-47). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
GameA. (1997). Sociology’s emotions. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 34, 385-399.
21.
GardnerF. (2001). Social work students and self-awareness: How does it happen?Reflective Practice, 2, 27-40.
22.
GatensM. (1988). Towards a feminist philosophy of the body. In CaineB.GroszE. A.De LepervancheM. M. (Eds.), Crossing boundaries: Feminisms and the critique of knowledges (pp. 50-70). Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.
23.
GlaserR. (1978). Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
GoldbergerN. R.TaruleJ. M.ClinchyB. M.BelenkyM. F. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by Women’s ways of knowing (1st ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
25.
GroszE. (1993). Bodies and knowledges: Feminism and the crisis of reason. In AlcoffL.PotterE. (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 187-215). New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
HallingS.GoldfarbM. (1991). Grounding truth in the body: Therapy and research renewed. Humanistic Psychologist, 19, 313-330.
27.
HannaT. (1980). The body of life (1st ed.). New York, NY: Random House.
28.
KleinW. C.BloomM. (1995). Practice wisdom. Social Work, 40, 799-807.
29.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.
MatthewsJ. C. (1994). Mindful body, embodied mind: Somatic knowing and education. Dissertation Abstracts International, 55(3), 425. (UMI No. 9422105)
31.
MatthewsJ. C. (1998). Somatic knowing and education. Educational Forum, 62, 236-242.
32.
MerriamS. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
MerriamS. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
MezirowJ. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35.
MichelsonE. (1996). Usual suspects: Experience, reflection and the (en)gendering of knowledge. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 15, 438-454.
36.
MichelsonE. (1998). Re-membering: The return of the body to experiential learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 20, 217-233.
37.
NagatomoS. (1992). An eastern concept of the body: Yuasa’s body scheme. In Sheets-JohnstoneM. (Ed.), Giving the body its due (pp. xi, 233). Albany: State University of New York Press.
38.
National Association of Social Workers. (1996). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author.
39.
National Association of Social Workers. (2004). Affirmative action report. Washington, DC: Author.
40.
NikitinaS. (2003), Movement class as an intergenerative experience: Academic, cognitive, and social effects. Journal of aesthetic education, 37, 54-63.
41.
O’LoughlinM. (1995). Intelligent bodies and ecological subjectivities: Merleau-Ponty’s corrective to postmodernism’s “subjects” of education. In NeimanA. (Ed.), Philosophy of education 1995 (pp. 334-342). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
42.
PaganoJ. A. (1995). Matters of the mind. In KohliW. (Ed.), Critical conversations in philosophy of education (pp. 340-354). New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
PeileC. (1998). Emotional and embodied knowledge implications for critical practice. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 25, 39-59.
44.
RichA. C. (1976). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution (1st ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
45.
RompfE. L.RoyseD. (1994). Choice of social work as a career: Possible influences. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 163-171.
46.
RossJ. (2000). Arts education in the information age: A new place for somatic wisdom. Arts Education Policy Review, 101, 27-32.
47.
RothschildB. (2000). The body remembers: The psychophysiology of trauma and trauma treatment. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
48.
Ruth-SahdL. A.TisdellE. J. (2007). The meaning and use of intuition in novice nurses. A phenomenological study. Adult Education Quarterly, 57, 115-140.
49.
SaleebeyD. (1992). Biology’s challenge to social work: Embodying the person-in-environment perspective. Social Work, 37, 112-118.
50.
ScaerR. C. (2002). The body bears the burden: Trauma, dissociation and disease. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Medical Press.
51.
SchonD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
52.
Sellers-YoungB. (1998). Somatic processes: Convergence of theory and practice. Theatre Topics, 8, 173-187.
53.
ShawR. (2004). The embodied psychotherapist: An exploration of the therapists’ somatic phenomena within the therapeutic encounter. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 271-288.
54.
SomervilleM. (2004). Tracing bodylines: The body in feminist poststructural research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17, 47-62.
55.
StinsonS. W. (1995). Body of knowledge. Educational Theory, 45, 43-54.
56.
StrozierA. L.StaceyL. (2001). The relevance of personal therapy in the education of MSW students. Clinical Social Work Journal, 29, 181-195.
57.
SundararajanL. (2002). Humanistic psychotherapy and the scientist-practitioner debate: An “embodied” perspective. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 42, 34-47.
58.
TangenbergK. M.KempS. (2002). Embodied practice: Claiming the body’s experience, agency, and knowledge for social work. Social Work, 47, 9-18.
59.
TisdellE. J. (1996). Feminist pedagogy and adult learning: Underlying theory and emancipatory practice. Adult Education Conference Research Proceedings, 37, 307-312.
