The topic of youth civic engagement is increasingly popular in social science research; however, the question of why some youth are civically involved while others are not is not well understood. This article addresses the following questions: What motivations and barriers do youth report for civic involvement? How do motivations and barriers differ across school contexts? A qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews with youth (N = 22) was used to identify four categories of motivations and two categories of barriers for civic involvement. Variation emerged in the motivations and barriers for civic involvement both within and across school contexts. Understanding civic motivations in context uncovers new insights about how to structure opportunities to better facilitate youth civic involvement.
AdlerR. P.GogginJ. (2005). What do we mean by “civic engagement?”Journal of Transformative Education, 3, 236-253.
2.
AtkinsR.HartD. (2003). Neighborhoods, adults, and the development of civic identity in Urban youth. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 156-164.
3.
BatsonC. D.AhmadN.TsangJ. (2002). Four motives for community involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 429-445.
4.
CemalcilarZ. (2009). Understanding individual characteristics of adolescents who volunteer. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 432-436.
5.
ColbyA.DamonW. (1992). Some do care: Contemporary lives of moral commitment. New York, NY: The Free Press.
6.
DamonW. (2008). The path to purpose: How young people find their calling in life. New York, NY: The Free Press.
7.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum
8.
Delli CarpiniM.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
FlanaganC. (2009). Young people’s civic engagement and political development. In FurlongA. (Ed.), International handbook of youth and young adulthood: New perspectives and agendas (pp. 293-300). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
FlanaganC. A.CumsilleP.GillS.GallayL. (2007). School and community climates and civic commitments: Processes for ethnic minority and majority students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 421-431.
11.
FlanaganC. A.FaisonN. (2001). Youth civic development: Implications of research for social policy and programs. Social Policy Report, 15, 3-15.
12.
FlanaganC.GillS.GallayL. (2005). Social participation and social trust in adolescence: The importance of heterogeneous encounters. In OmotoA. (Ed.), Processes of community change and social action (pp. 149-166). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
Foster-BeyJ. (2008, December). Do race, ethnicity citizenship and socio-economic status determine civic engagement? (CIRCLE Working Paper 62). Medford, MA: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
14.
FredricksJ. A.Alfeld-LiroC. J.HrudaL. Z.EcclesJ. S.PatrickH.RyanA. M. (2002). A qualitative exploration of adolescents’ commitments to athletics and the arts. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17, 68-97.
15.
GalstonW. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 217-234.
16.
GardnerM.RothJ.Brooks-GunnJ. (2008). Adolescents’ participation in organized activities and developmental success 2 and 8 years after high school: Do sponsorship, duration, and intensity matter?Developmental Psychology, 44, 814-830.
HartD.DonnellyT.M.YounissJ.AtkinsR. (2007). High school community service as a predictor of adult voting and volunteering. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 197-219.
19.
HartD.KirshnerB. (2009). Civic Participation and development among urban adolescents. In YounissJ.LevineP. (Ed.), Engaging young people in civic life (pp. 102-120). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
20.
HendersonA.BrownS. D.PancerS. M.Ellis-HaleK. (2007). Mandated community service in high school and subsequent civic engagement: The case of the “double cohort” in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 849-860.
21.
HessD. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
JahromiP. (2011). American identity in the USA: Youth perspectives. Applied Developmental Science, 15(2), 79-93.
23.
KahneJ.MiddaughE. (2008, February). Democracy for some: The civic opportunity gap in high school (CIRCLE Working Paper 59). Medford, MA: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
24.
KirshnerB.StrobelK.FernándezM. (2003). Critical civic engagement among urban youth. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 2(1), 1-20.
25.
LevinsonM. (2007, January). The civic achievement gap (CIRCLE Working Paper 51). Medford, MA: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
26.
LevinsonM. (2010). The civic empowerment gap: Defining the problem and locating solutions In. SherrodL.FlanaganC.Torney-PurtaJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 331-362). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
27.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (CartwrightD., Ed.). New York, NY: Harper and Row. (Original work published 1944)
28.
MatsubaJ. K.HartD.AtkinsR. (2007). Psychological and social-structural influences on commitment to volunteering. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 889-907.
29.
MetzE. C.YounissJ. (2005). Longitudinal gains in civic development through school-based required service. Political Psychology, 26, 413-427.
30.
ObradovićJ.MastenA. S. (2007). Developmental antecedents of young adults civic engagement. Applied Developmental Science, 11, 2-19.
31.
OmotoA. M.SnyderM. (1995). Sustained helping without obligation: Motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 671-686.
32.
PancerM. S.PrattM.HunsbergerB.AlisatS. (2007). Community and political involvement in adolescence: What distinguishes the activists from the uninvolved?Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 741-759.
33.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
34.
PearceN. J.LarsonR. W. (2006). How teens become engaged in youth development programs: The process model of motivational change in a civic activism organization. Applied Developmental Science, 10, 121-131.
35.
PennerL. A. (2003). Dispositional and organizational influences on sustained volunteerism: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 447-467.
36.
PerryJ. L.BrundeyJ. L.CourseyD.LittlepageL. (2008). What drives morally committed citizens? A study of the antecedents of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 68, 445-458.
37.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 367-373.
38.
ReindersH.YounissJ. (2006). School-based required community service and civic development in adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 10, 2-12.
39.
RubinB. (2007). “There’s still not justice”: Youth civic identity development amid distinct school and community contexts. Teachers College Record, 109, 449-481.
40.
Sanchez-JankowskiM. (2002). Minority youth and civic engagement: The impact of group Relations. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 237-245.
41.
SherrodL. R. (2003). Promoting the development of citizenship in diverse youth. Political Science & Politics, 36(2), 287-292.
42.
SherrodL. R.FlanaganC. A.KassimirR.SyvertsenA. B. (Eds.). (2005). Youth activism: An international encyclopedia. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Company.
43.
SherrodL. R.FlanaganC.YounissJ. (2002). Dimensions on citizenship and opportunities for youth development: The what, why, when, where, and who of citizenship development. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 264-272.
44.
SnyderM. (2009). In the footsteps of Kurt Lewin: Practical theorizing, action research, and the psychology of social action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 225-245.
45.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
TaylorT. TPancerS. M. (2007). Community service experiences and commitment to volunteering. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 320-345.
47.
Torney-PurtaJ. (2002). The school’s role in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 203-212.
48.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
WalkerT. (2000). The service/politics split: Rethinking service to teach political engagement. Political Science & Politics, 33, 646-649.
50.
WalkerT. (2002). Service as a pathway to political participation: What research tells us. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 183-188.
51.
WarburtonJ.SmithJ. (2003). Out of the generosity of your heart: Are we creating active citizens through compulsory volunteer programmes for young people in Australia?Social Policy and Administration, 37, 772-786.
52.
WeberR. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
53.
WilkenfeldB. (2009, May). Does context matter? How the family, peer, school, and neighborhood contexts relate to adolescents’ civic engagement (Working Paper 64). Medford, MA: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
54.
Wray-LakeL. (2008, March). The development of adolescents’ civic values and the role of family value messages. Biennial meeting of Society for Research on Adolescence, Chicago, IL.
55.
YatesM.YounissJ. (1998). Community service and political identity development in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 495-512.
56.
YounissJ.McLellanJ. A.MazerB. (2001). Voluntary service, peer group orientation, and civic engagement. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16(5), 456-468.
57.
YounissJ.LevineP. (Eds.). (2009). Engaging young people in civic life. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
58.
YounissJ.McLellanJ. A.YatesM. (1997). What we know about engendering civic identity. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 620-631.
59.
YounissJ.YatesM. (1999). Youth service and moral-civic identity: A case for everyday morality. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 361-376.
