Les techniques de neutralisation, qui permettent aux consommateurs d’accomplir des pratiques déviantes tout en restant attachés à la norme de référence, sont mal connues. Nous montrons, dans le cas du téléchargement illégal, qu’il s’agit d’un assemblage discursif autonome, articulé autour de trois stratégies défensives (déresponsabilisation neutralisatrice, neutralisation pragmatique, neutralisation idéologique), et supportant la contradiction interne.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. organizational behavior and human decision process50(2): 179–211.
2.
AmineAGicquelY (2011) Rethinking resistance and anti-consumption behaviors in the light of the concept of deviance. European Journal of Marketing45(11/12): 1809–1819.
3.
ArendtH (1991 [1966]), Eichman à Jérusalem: rapport sur la banalité du mal. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.
4.
ArnouldEWallendorfM (1994) Market-oriented ethnography: interpretation building and marketing strategy formulation. Journal of Marketing Research31(4): 484–504.
5.
BabeauOChanlatJ-F (2011) Déviance ordinaire, innovation et gestion. Revue Française de Gestion1(210): 33–50.
6.
BanduraABarbaranelliCCapraraGVPastorelliC (1996) Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercice of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71(2): 364–374.
7.
Bardini et Proulx (éd.) (2000) Les promesses du cyberespace. Médiations, pratiques et pouvoirs à l’heure de la communication électronique. Sociologie et sociétés32(2): 3–8.
BeauvoisJ-LJouleR-V (1996) A Radical Dissonance Theory. London: Taylor and Francis.
10.
BeckerHS (1985[1963]), Outsiders: Etudes de sociologie de la déviance. Paris: Editions A-M Métailié.
11.
BergadaàM (2004) Evolution de l’épistémè économique et sociale : proposition d’un cadre de morale, de déontologie, d’éthique et de responsabilité pour le marketer. Recherche et Applications en Marketing19(1): 55–72.
12.
BersoffDM (1999) Why good people sometimes do bad things: motivated reasoning and unethical behavior. Personality and social psychology bulletin25(1): 28–39.
13.
BretonP (2002) La société de l’information: de l’utopie au désenchantement. Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales40(123): 35–59.
14.
CammaertsB (2011) The hegemonic copyright regime vs the sharing copyright users of music?Media, Culture and Society33(3): 491–502.
15.
CanivencS (2008) Les formes organisationnelles médiatisées par les TIC tiraillées entre logique d’autonomie et logique de contrôle: une démocratie toujours limitée. 5èmes Doctoriales du GDR TIC et Société, Rennes.
16.
ChaneyD (2008) Pourquoi acheter un CD quand on peut le télécharger? Une approche exploratoire par le concept d’appropriation. Management et Avenir20(6): 30–48.
17.
ChappleCNofzigerS (2000) Bingo! hints of deviance in the accounts of sociability and profit of bingo players. Deviant behavior21(6): 489–517.
18.
ChatzidakisAHibbertSSmithAP (2007) Why people don’t take their concerns about fair trade to the supermarket: the role of neutralisation. Journal of Business Ethics74(1): 89–100.
19.
ChatzidakisASmithAPHibbertS (2009) “… Do I need it, do I, do I really need this?”: Exploring the role of rationalization in impulse buying episodes. Advances in Consumer Research36, 248–253.
20.
ChenM-FPanC-TPanM-C (2009) The joint moderating impact of moral intensity and moral judgment on consumer’s use intention of pirated software. Journal of Business Ethics90(3): 361–373.
21.
ColemanJW (1994) The criminal elite: the sociology of white-collar crime. New York: St. Martin’s.
22.
CooperJFazioRH (1984) A new look at dissonance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology17, 229–262.
23.
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
CromwellPBirzerM (2012) The curious case of george: a case study of a career criminal. Criminal Justice Review37(4): 512–526.
25.
CromwellPThurmanQ (2003) The devil made me do it: use of neutralizations by shoplifters. Deviant Behaviour24(6): 535–550.
26.
DejeanSPénardTSuireR (2010) Une première évaluation des effets de la loi Hadopi sur les pratiques des Internautes français, étude de l’observatoire M@rsouin, http://www.marsouin.org
27.
Denegri-KnottJ (2004) Sinking the online “music pirates”: Foucault, power, and deviance on the web. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication9(4).
28.
Denegri-KnottJ (2006) Consumers behaving badly: deviation or innovation? Power struggles on the web. Journal of Consumer Behaviour5(1): 82–94.
29.
DjelassiSPerronF (2009) Comportements déviants du consommateur et démarque, une approche exploratoire. Actes des 14ème Journées de Recherche en Marketing de Bourgogne, Dijon.
FestingerL (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
FestingerL (1999) Reflections on cognitive dissonance: 30 years later. In Harmon-JonesEMillsJ (éd.) Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 381–385.
33.
FishbeinMAjzenI (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
34.
FlichyP (2001) L’imaginaire d’Internet. Paris: La Découverte.
35.
FritscheI (2005) Predicting deviant behavior by neutralization: Myths and Findings. Deviant Behavior26(5): 483–510.
36.
FullertonRAPunjG (2004) Repercussions of promoting an ideology of consumption: consumer misbehavior. Journal of Business Research57(11): 1239–1249.
37.
Garcia-BardidiaGNauJ-PRémyE (2011) Consumer resistance and anti-consumption: insights from the deviant careers of French illegal downloaders. European Journal of Marketing45(11/12): 1789–1798.
38.
Garcia-BardidiaGNauJ-PRémyE (2012) La consommation illégale de musique numérique: y résister ou se l’approprier. Décisions Marketing68(octobre/décembre): 89–94.
39.
GieslerM (2008) Conflict and compromise drama in marketplace evolution. Journal of Consumer Research34(6): 739–753.
40.
GlaserBGStraussAA (2010 [1967]) La découverte de la théorie ancrée: Stratégies pour la recherche qualitative. Paris: Armand Colin.
41.
GoslingPDenizeauMOberléD (2006) Denial of responsability: a new mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(5): 722–733.
42.
GreenspanP (1995) Practical guilt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
GruberVSchlegelmilchBB (2013) How techniques of neutralization legitimize norm- and attitude-inconsistent consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, à paraître.
44.
Hadopi (2011) Hadopi, biens culturels et usage d’Internet: pratiques et perceptions des internautes français, premier baromètre T0.
45.
HarrisLCDauntKL (2011) Deviant customer behavior: a study of techniques of neutralisation. Journal of Marketing Management27(7/8): 834–853.
46.
HarrisLCDumasA (2009) Online consumer misbehavior: an application of neutralization. Marketing Theory9(4): 379–402.
47.
HazaniM (1991) Aligning vocabulary, symbol banks, and sociocultural structure. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography20: 179–202.
48.
HeathJ (2008) Business ethics and moral motivation: a criminological perspective. Journal of Business Ethics83(4): 595–614.
49.
Hennig-ThurauTHenningVSattlerH (2007) Consumer file sharing of motion pictures. Journal of Marketing71(4): 1–18.
50.
HenryPC (2010) How mainstream consumers think about consumer rights and responsibilities. Journal of Consumer Research37(4): 670–687.
51.
HenrySEatonR (1999) Degrees of deviance: Student accounts of their deviant behaviour. Salem, WI: Sheffield Publishing.
52.
HirschiT (1969) Cause of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
53.
HollandRWMeertensRMvan VugtM (2002) Dissonance on the road: self-esteem as a moderator of internal and external justification strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28(12): 1713–1724.
54.
HuntSDVitellS (1986) A general theory of marketing Ethics. Journal of Macromarketing6(1): 5–16.
55.
IngramJRHindujaS (2008) Neutralizing music piracy: an empirical examination. Deviant Behavior29(4): 334–366.
56.
KlockarsCK (1974) The professional fence. New York: Free Press.
57.
KozinetsRVHandelmanJM (2004) Adversaries of consumption: consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research31(3): 691–704.
58.
Le CaisneL (2004) L’économie des valeurs distinction et classement en milieu carcéral. L’année sociologique54(2): 511–537.
59.
LiaoCLinH-NLiuY-P (2010) Predicting the use of pirated software: a contingency model integrating perceived risk with the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics91(2): 237–252.
60.
LindgrenSLindeJ (2012) The subpolitics of online piracy: a Swedish case study, Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies18(2): 143–164.
61.
LuedickeMKThompsonCJGieslerM (2010) Consumer identity work as moral protagonism: how myth and ideology animate a brand-mediated moral conflict. Journal of Consumer Research36(6): 1016–1032.
62.
MarunaSCopesH (2005) Excuses, excuses: what have we learned from five decades of neutralization research?Crime and Justice: A Review of Research32: 221–320.
63.
McGregorSLT (2008) Conceptualizing immoral and unethical consumption using neutralization theory. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal36(1): 261–276.
64.
McKimmieBMTerryDJHoggMA (2009) Dissonance reduction in the context of group membership: the role of metaconsistency. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice13(2): 103–119.
65.
MillsMKBonomaTV (1979) Deviant consumer behavior: a different view. In WL Wilkie (éd.)Advances in Consumer Research6: 347–352.
66.
MinorWW (1981) Techniques of neutralization: a reconceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency18(2): 295–318.
NelsonEDLambertRD (2001) Sticks, stones and semantics: the ivory tower bully’s vocabulary of motives. Qualitative Sociology24(1): 83–106.
69.
NicolasY (2005) Le téléchargement sur les réseaux de pair à pair. Développement culturel148: 1–11.
70.
NurockV (2004) Intuition morale et morale naïve. L’Année sociologique54(2): 435–453.
71.
OgienA (2012) Sociologie de la déviance. Paris : PUF.
72.
Özçaglar-ToulouseNCovaB (2010) Une histoire de la CCT française: parcours et concepts clés. Recherche et Applications en Marketing25(2): 69–91.
73.
PapermanPLaugierS (2005) Le souci des autres: éthique et politique du care. Paris: Editions de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.
74.
PeñalozaLPriceLL (1993) Consumer resistance: a conceptual overview. In McAlisterLRothschildML (éd.) Advances in Consumer Research20: 123–128.
75.
Peretti-WatelP (2003) Neutralization theory and the denial of risk: some evidence from cannabis use among French adolescents. British Journal of Sociology54(1): 21–42.
76.
PiacentiniMGChatzidakisABanisterE (2012) Making sense of drinking: the role of techniques of neutralisation and counter-neutralisation in negotiating alcohol consumption. Sociology of Health and Illness34(6): 841–857.
77.
ProulxSGoldenbergA (2010) Internet et la culture de la gratuité. Revue du Mauss35(1): 503–517.
78.
RheingoldH (2000 [1993]), The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79.
RobertsonKMcNeillLGreenJRobertsC (2012) Illegal downloading, ethical concern, and illegal behavior. Journal of Business Ethics108: 215–227.
80.
RouxD (2007) La résistance du consommateur: proposition d’un cadre d’analyse. Recherche et Applications en Marketing22(4): 59–80.
81.
RussJLeguilC (1994) La pensée éthique contemporaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
82.
SchelerM (1973 [1966]) Formalism in ethics and non-formal ethics of values. A new attempt toward the foundation of an ethical personalism. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
83.
ShangR-AChenY-CChenP-C (2008) Ethical decisions about sharing music files in the P2P environment. Journal of Business Ethics80(2): 349–365.
84.
ShuLLGinoFBazermanMH (2011) Dishonest deed, clear conscience: when cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting. Personality and social psychology bulletin37(3): 330–349.
85.
SimonLGreenbergGJBrehmJ (1995) Trivialisation: the forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology68(2): 247–260.
86.
SinhaRKMandelN (2008) Preventing digital music piracy: the carrot or the stick. Journal of Marketing72(1): 1–15.
87.
SpiggleS (1994) Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research21(3): 491–503.
88.
StoneJCooperJ (2001) A self-standards model of cognitive dissonance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology37: 228–243.
89.
SykesGMMatzaD (1957) Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review22(6): 664–670.
90.
ThompsonCJLocanderWBPollioHR (1989) Putting consumer experience back into consumer research: the philosophy and method of existential-phenomenology. Journal of Consumer Research16(2): 133–146.
91.
ThompsonCJ (1997) Interpreting consumers: a hermeneutical framework for deriving marketing insights from the texts of consumers’ consumption stories. Journal of Marketing Research34(4): 438–55.
92.
Ulver-SneistrupSAskegaardSKristensenDB (2011) The new work ethics of consumption and the paradox of mundane brand resistance. Journal of Consumer Culture11(2): 215–238.
93.
VaidisDHalimi-FalkowiczS (2007) La théorie de la dissonance cognitive: une théorie âgée d’un demi-siècle. Revue électronique de Psychologie Sociale1: 9–18.
94.
WangC-CChenC-TYangS-CFarnC-K (2009) Pirate or buy? The moderating effect of idolatry. Journal of Business Ethics90(1): 81–93.
95.
YangDSonmezMBosworthDFryxellG (2008) Global software piracy: searching for further explanations. Journal of Business Ethics87(2): 269–283.
96.
YungB (2009) Reflecting on the common discourse on piracy and intellectual property rights: a divergent perspective, Journal of Business Ethics87(1): 45–57.
97.
ZollaE (1998) Aspects socio-politiques de l’Internet – un cas particulier: observation de la présence du mouvement anarchiste sur Internet. Mémoire de D.E.A. en Sociologie, Université d’Evry Val d’Essonne.
