Cet article propose un modèle intégrateur de l’efficacité créative personnelle et collective. Le modèle teste l’influence de l’efficacité créative personnelle et de ses déterminants (connaissances acquises par l’expérience et par l’observation, encouragements verbaux d’un tiers et activation émotionnelle), ainsi que celle de la proximité sociale, sur l’efficacité créative collective. De plus, la validité prédictive de l’efficacité créative collective est testée via l’originalité perçue de la production créative des équipes. Les résultats valident la conceptualisation proposée, incluant la hiérarchisation des déterminants de l’efficacité créative personnelle. Ils soulignent également l’existence d’une relation quadratique entre la proximité sociale et l’efficacité créative collective, ainsi que le rôle de médiateur partiel de l’efficacité créative personnelle entre ses déterminants et l’efficacité créative collective.
AlloingP (2006) Comment faire réussir des professionnels de haut niveau?Revue Française de Gestion168/169(9): 177–192.
2.
AmabileTM (1996) Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3.
AmabileTM (1998) How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review76(5): 76–87.
4.
AronAAronESmollanD (1992) Inclusion of other in the self-scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63(4): 596–612.
5.
AronAAronEN (1986) Love as the expansion of self – Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York: Hemisphere.
6.
AskewSLodgeC (2000) Feedback for learning. Londres: Routledge.
7.
Atuahene-GimaKWeiYS (2011) The vital role of problem-solving competence in new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management28(1): 81–98.
8.
AubertBGottelandD (2010) Former les consommateurs à l’usage des produits: intérêt et principes de mise en œuvre. Décisions Marketing59(3): 7–16.
9.
BanduraA (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review84(2): 191–215.
10.
BanduraA (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist37(2): 122–147.
11.
BanduraA (2007) Auto-efficacité. Le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle. Paris: De Boeck Université.
12.
BissolaRImperatoriBColonelRT (2014) Enhancing the creative performance of new product teams: an organizational configurational approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management31(2): 375–391.
13.
BollenKALongJS (1992) Tests for structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research21(November): 123–131.
14.
BorgogniLPetittaLMastrorilliA (2010) Correlates of collective efficacy in the Italian Air Force. Applied Psychology: An International Review59(3): 515–537.
15.
BradleyMMLangPJ (1994) Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry25(1): 49–59.
16.
BulloughARenkoMMyattT (2014) Danger zone entrepreneurs: the importance of resilience and self-efficacy for entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(3): 473–499.
17.
BurroughsJEDahlDWMoreauCPChattopadhyayAGornGJ (2011) Facilitating and rewarding creativity during new product development. Journal of Marketing75(4): 53–67.
18.
CalderBJPhillipsLWTyboutAM (1981) Designing research for application. Journal of Consumer Research8(2): 197–207.
19.
CaldwellDFO’ReillyCA (2003) The determinants of team-based innovation in organizations the role of social influence. Small Group Research34(4): 497–517.
20.
ChenC-HVKaoR-H (2011) A multilevel study on the relationships between work characteristics, self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and organizational citizenship behavior: the case of Taiwanese police duty-executing organizations. Journal of Psychology145(4): 361–390.
21.
ChengH-HYangH-L (2011) Student team projects in information systems development: measuring collective creative efficacy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology27(6): 881–895.
22.
ChengH-HYangH-L (2014) The antecedents of collective creative efficacy for information system development teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management33(1): 1–17.
23.
CoteJABuckleyMR (1987) Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3): 315–318.
24.
DahlDWChattopadhyayAGornGJ (1999) The use of visual mental imagery in new product design. Journal of Marketing Research36(1): 18–28.
25.
DayanMZaccaRDi BenedettoA (2013) An exploratory study of entrepreneurial creativity: its antecedents and mediators in the context of UAE firms. Creativity and Innovation Management22(3): 223–240.
26.
De DreuCKWBaasMNijstadBA (2008) Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood–creativity link: toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology94(5): 739–756.
27.
DerbaixCPoncinIDroulersORoulletB (2012) Measuring affective reactions induced by social campaigns: complementarity and convergence of iconic and verbal measures. Recherche et Applications en Marketing27(2): 71–90.
28.
DokkoGKaneAATortorielloM (2014) One of us of my friends. How social and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organization Studies35(5): 703–726
29.
DrèzeXNunesJC (2011) Recurring goals and learning: the impact of successful reward attainment on purchase behavior. Journal of Marketing Research48(2): 268–281.
30.
EllenPSBeardenWOSharmaS (1991) Resistance to technological innovations: an examination of the role of self-efficacy and performance satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science19(4): 297–307.
31.
FaureC (2001) Comment gérer les équipes de développement de produits nouveaux. Recherche et Applications en Marketing16(2): 77–86.
32.
Fernández-BallesterosRDiez-NicolasJCapraraGBarbaranelliCBanduraA (2002) Determinants and structural relation of personal efficacy to collective efficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review51(1): 107–125.
33.
FordC (1996) A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review21(4): 1112–1142.
34.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(3): 39–50.
35.
FuFGRichardsKAHughesDEJonesE (2010) Motivating salespeople to sell new products: the relative influence of attitudes, subjective norms, and self-efficacy. Journal of Marketing74(6): 61–74.
36.
GeorgeJMZhouJ (2007) Dual tuning in a supportive context: joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal50(3): 605–622.
37.
GibsonCBEarleyPC (2007) Collective cognition in action: accumulation, interaction, examination, and accommodation in the development and operation of group efficacy beliefs in the workplace. Academy of Management Review32(2): 438–458.
38.
GistMMitchellT (1992) Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review17(2): 183–211.
GodartFCMadduxWWShipilovAVGalinskyAD (2015) Fashion with a foreign flair: professional experiences abroad facilitate the creative innovations of organizations. Academy of Management Journal58(1): 195–200.
41.
GongYHuangJCFarhJL (2009) Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: the mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal52(4):765–778.
42.
GullySMIncalcaterraKAJoshiABeaubienJM (2002) A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology87(5): 819–832.
43.
GranovetterMS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
44.
GyllenstenKPalmerSNilssonE-KRegnérAMFrodiA (2010) Experiences of cognitive coaching: a qualitative study. International Coaching Psychology Review5(2): 98–108.
45.
HaYLennonSJ (2010) Online visual merchandising (VMD) cues and consumer pleasure and arousal: purchasing versus browsing situation. Psychology and Marketing27(2): 141–165.
46.
HargadonABBechkyBA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: a field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science17(4): 484–500.
47.
HarrisonSHRouseED (2015) An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Academy of Management Journal58(2): 375–404.
48.
HauserJTellisGJGriffinA (2006) Research on innovation: a review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing Science25(6): 687–717.
49.
HennesseyBAmabileT (2010) Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology61(1): 569–598.
50.
HoeglM (2005) Smaller teams – better teamwork: how to keep project teams small. Business Horizons48(3): 209–214.
51.
HooverJDGiambatistaRBelkinL (2012) Eyes on, hands on: vicarious observational learning as an enhancement to direct experience. Academy of Management Learning and Education11(4): 591–608.
52.
HoughtonJDDawleyDDi LielloTC (2012) The abbreviated self-leadership-questionnaire (aslq): a more concise measure of self-leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies7(2): 216–232.
53.
HuLTBentlerPM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods3(4): 424–453.
54.
HubertF (2012) On the role and interrelationship of spatial, social and cognitive proximity: personal knowledge relationships of R&D workers in the Cambridge Information Technology cluster. Regional Studies46(9): 1169–1182.
55.
JaccardJWanC KTurrisiR (1990) The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research25(4): 467–478.
56.
JenningsJEEdwardsTJenningsPDDelbridgeR (2015) Emotional arousal and entrepreneurial outcomes: combining qualitative methods to elaborate theory. Journal of Business Venturing30(1): 113–130.
57.
JoëtGUsherELBressouxP (2011) Sources of self-efficacy: an investigation of elementary school students in France. Journal of Educational Psychology103(3): 649–663.
58.
KarwowskiM (2011) It doesn’t hurt to ask… But sometimes it hurts to believe: Polish students’ creative self-efficacy and its predictors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts5(2): 154–164.
59.
KelleyHHBerscheidEChristensenAHarveyJHHustonTLLevingerGMcClinitockEPeplauLAPetersonDR (1983) Close Relationships. New York: Freeman.
60.
KrackhardtD (1992) The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations. In: NohriaNEcclesRC (éds.) Networks and Organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 216–239.
61.
LehmannD (1994) Characteristics of ‘really new products’. Papier de recherche, conférence du Marketing Science Institute, Boston.
62.
LiuJChenJTaoY (2015) Innovation performance in new product development teams in China’s technology ventures: the role of behavioral integration dimensions and collective efficacy. Journal of Product Innovation Management32(1): 29–44.
63.
LiuWGalD (2011) Bringing us together or driving us apart: the effect of soliciting consumer input on consumers’ propensity to transact with an organization. Journal of Consumer Research38(2): 242–259.
64.
LiviatanITropeYLibermanN (2008) Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology44(5) 1256–1269.
65.
MathisenGE (2011) Organizational antecedents of creative self-efficacy. Creativity and Innovation Management20(3): 185–195.
66.
MehrabianARussellJA (1974) An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
67.
MillerJWStromeyerWRSchwietermanMA (2013) Extensions of the Johnson-Neyman technique to linear models with curvilinear effects: derivations and analytical tools. Multivariate Behavioral Research48(2): 267–300.
68.
NewellSJHendersonKVWuBT (2001) The effects of pleasure and arousal on recall of advertisements during the Super Bowl. Psychology and Marketing18(11): 1135–1153.
69.
NoseworthyTJDi MuroFMurrayKB (2014) The role of arousal in congruity-based product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research41(4): 1108–1126.
70.
OsbornAF (1963) Applied Imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. New York: Scribner.
71.
Perry-SmithJ (2006) Social yet creative: the role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal49(1): 85–101.
72.
Perry-SmithJShalleyC (2003) The social side of creativity: a static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review28(1): 89–106.
73.
PingRA (1995) A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research32(3): 336–347.
74.
PodsakoffP M.MacKenzieSBLeeJYPodsakoffNP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
75.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods36(4): 717–731.
76.
PrussiaGEKinickiAJ (1996) A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology81(2): 187–198
77.
RichterAWHirstGVan KnippenbergDBaerM (2012) Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: cross-level interactions with team informational resources. Journal of Applied Psychology97(6): 1282–1290.
78.
RiggsMLKnightPA (1994) The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology79(5):755–766.
79.
SadriGRobertsonIT (1993) Self-efficacy and work-related behavior: a review and meta-analysis. Applied Psychology42(2): 139–152.
80.
SalanovaMRodríguez-SánchezAMSchaufeliWBCifreE (2014) Flowing together: a longitudinal study of collective efficacy and collective flow among workgroups. The Journal of Psychology148(4): 435–55.
81.
Sawyer (1975) Demand artifacts in laboratory experiments in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research1(4): 20–30.
82.
ScheibeKPMenneckeBELuseA (2007) The role of effective modeling in the development of self-efficacy: the case of the transparent engine. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education5(1): 21–42.
83.
SchumackerREMarcoulidesGA (1998) Interaction and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
84.
SchmittN (1998) Quantifying word association responses: what is native-like ?. System26(3): 389–401.
85.
SchunkDH (1984) Self-efficacy and classroom learning. In: 68th annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, USA, 23–27 April, 2–47.
86.
SosaME (2011) Where do creative interaction come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organization Science22(1): 1–21.
87.
SteenkampJBEVan TrijpH (1991) The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing8(4): 283–299.
88.
SweetmanDLuthansFAveyJBLuthansB (2011) Relationship between positive psychological capital and creative performance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science28(1): 1–34.
89.
ThompsonDVHamiltonRWRustRT (2005) Feature fatigue: when product capabilities become too much of a good thing. Journal of Marketing Research42(4): 431–442.
90.
TierneyPFarmerS (2002) Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal45(6): 1137–1148.
91.
ToubiaO (2006) Idea generation, creativity, and incentives. Marketing Science25(5): 411–425.
92.
WarnerLMSchüzBWolffJKParschauLWurmSSchwarzerR (2014) Sources of self-efficacy for physical activity. Health Psychology33(11): 1298–1308.
93.
WhiteKMacDonnellRDahlDW (2011) It’s the mindset that matters: the role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors over the long-term. Journal of Marketing Research48(3): 472–485.
94.
YiYMDavisFD (2003) Developing and validating observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Information Systems Research14(2): 146–169.
95.
ZhaoXLynchJGJrChenQ (2011) Reconsidérer Baron et Kenny: mythes et vérités à propos de l’analyse de médiation. Recherche et Applications en Marketing26(1): 81–95.
