This article examines how land use planning and regulation may affect regional economic prosperity by reviewing relevant literature. It identifies a set of complex causal links between land use and regional economies—through (1) development pattern changes and spatial structure reformation, (2) land market efficiency improvements, (3) supply constraints and price increases in property markets, and (4) labor market shifts—that suggest the possibility of countervailing effects. The review also reveals that the economic consequences of land use policies may highly depend on context and that institutional settings as well as substantive policies are essential for achieving more systematic coordination of land use planning and economic development practices.
Alexander, E.R.1992. A transaction cost theory of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association58:190-200.
2.
---. 1994. To plan or not to plan, that is the question: Transaction cost theory and its implications for planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design21:341-52.
3.
---. 2001. Why planning vs. markets is an oxymoron: Asking the right question. Planning and Markets4:1-6. http://www.-pam.usc.edu/volume4/v4i1a2print.html (accessed October, 28, 2006).
4.
Anthony, J.2003. The effects of Florida’s growth management act on housing affordability. Journal of the American Planning Association69:282-95.
5.
Badoe, D.A., and E.J. Miller.2000. Transportation-land-use interaction: Empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling. Transportation Research Part D5:235-63.
6.
Bailey, M.J.1959. Note on the economics of residential zoning and urban renewal. Land Economics35:288-92.
7.
Begg, I.1999. Cities and competitiveness. Urban Studies36:795-809.
8.
Berry, C.2001. Land use regulation and residential segregation: Does zoning matter. American Law and Economics Review3:251-74.
9.
Besley, T.1995. Property rights and investment incentives: Theory and evidence from Ghana. The Journal of Political Economy103:903-37.
10.
Bramley, G., and C. Lambert.2002. Managing urban development: Land use planning and city competitiveness, in Urban competitiveness: Policies for dynamic cities, ed. I. Begg , 283-310. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
11.
Buitelaar, E.2004. A transaction-cost analysis of the land development process . Urban Studies41:2539-53.
12.
Burchell, R.W., A. Downs, B. McCann, and S. Mukherji.2005. Sprawl costs: Economic impacts of unchecked development. Washington, DC: Island Press.
13.
Burchell, R.W., N.A. Shad, D. Listokin, H. Phillips, A. Downs, S. Seskin, J.S. Davis, T. Moore, D. Helton, M. Gall.1998. The costs of sprawl-Revisited. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14.
Burnell, J.D.1985. Industrial land use, externalities, and residential location . Urban Studies22:399-408.
15.
Calzonetti, F.J., and R.T. Walker.1991. Factors affecting industrial location decisions: A survey approach. In Industrial location and public policy, ed. H. W. Herzog, Jr. and A. M. Schlottmann, 221-240. Knoxville, TN: The University of Tennessee Press.
16.
Carruthers, J.I.2003. Growth at the fringe: The influence of political fragmentation in United States metropolitan areas. Papers in Regional Science82:475-99.
17.
Carruthers, J.I., and G.F. Ulfarsson.2002. Fragmentation and sprawl: Evidence from interregional analysis. Growth and Change33:312-40.
18.
---. 2003. Urban sprawl and the cost of public services. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30:503-22.
19.
Cervero, R.2001. Efficient urbanisation: Economic performance and the shape of the metropolis. Urban Studies38:1651-71.
20.
Cervero, R., and M. Duncan.2006. Which reduces vehicle travel more: Jobs-housing balance or retail-housing mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association72:475-90.
21.
Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman.1997. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment2:199-219.
22.
Cheshire, P.C., and C.A.L. Hilber.2008. Office space supply restrictions in Britain: The political economy of market revenge. The Economic Journal118: F185-221.
23.
Cheshire, P.C., and S. Sheppard.2005. The introduction of price signals into land use planning decision-making: A proposal. Urban Studies42:647-63.
24.
Ciccone, A.2002. Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review46:213-27.
25.
Ciccone, A., and R.E. Hall.1996. Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review86:54-70.
26.
Correll, M.R., J.H. Lillydahl, and L.D. Singell.1978. The effects of greenbelts on residential property values: Some findings on the political economy of open space. Land Economics54: 207-17.
27.
Crane, R.2000. The influence of urban form on travel: An interpretive review. Journal of Planning Literature15:2-23.
28.
Crecine, J.P., O.A. Davis, and J.E. Jackson.1967. Urban property markets: Some empirical results and their implications for municipal zoning. Journal of Law and Economics10:79-99.
29.
D’Arcy, E., and G. Keogh.1999. The property market and urban competitiveness: A review. Urban Studies36:917-28.
30.
Davis, O.A.1963. Economic elements in municipal zoning decisions. Land Economics39:375-86.
31.
Dawkins, C.J.2000. Transaction costs and the land use planning process. Journal of Planning Literature14:507-18.
32.
Dawkins, C.J., and A.C. Nelson.2003. State growth management programs and central-city revitalization. Journal of the American Planning Association69:381-96.
33.
Deal, B., J.H. Kim, and A. Chakraborty.2009. Growth management and sustainable transport: Do growth management policies promote transit use?Journal of Public Transportation12:21-40.
34.
Do, Q.T., and L. Iyer.2003. Land rights and economic development: Evidence from Vietnam. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3120. http://www.-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2003/09/23/000094946_03091104055746/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf
35.
Downs, A.1991. The advisory commission on regulatory barriers to affordable housing: Its behavior and accomplishments. Housing Policy Debate2:1095-137.
36.
---. 2002. Have housing prices risen faster in Portland than elsewhere ? Housing Policy Debate13:7-31.
37.
Evans, A.W.2004. Economics and land use planning. Oxford : Blackwell.
38.
Ewing, R.1997. Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association63:107-26.
39.
Ewing, R., and R. Cervero.2001. Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record1780:87-114.
40.
Ewing, R.H.1996. Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: A literature review. Environmental and Urban Studies21:1-15.
41.
Ewing, R.H., R. Pendall, and D. Chen.2002. Measuring sprawl and its impact, Washington, DC: Smart Growth Americahttp://smartgrowthamerica.org/sprawlindex/MeasuringSprawlTechnical.pdf
42.
Feder, G., and D. Feeny.1991. Land tenure and property rights: Theory and implications for development policy. The World Bank Economic Review5:135-53.
43.
Friend, J.K., and W.N. Jessop.1969. Local government and strategic choice: An operational research approach to the processes of public planning, Beverly Hills: Sage.
44.
Fulton, W., R. Pendall, M. Nguyen, and A. Harrison.2001. Who sprawls the most? How growth patterns differ across the U.S. Washington, DC: Bookings Institution. http://www.brookings.edu/es/urban/publications/fulton.pdf
45.
Gardner, B.D.1977. The economics of agricultural land preservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics59:1027-36.
46.
Gibb, K., D. Mackay, and M. White.2002. The property sector and its role in shaping urban competitiveness: A selective review of literature and evidence . In Urban competitiveness: Policies for dynamic cities, ed. I. Begg, 81-100. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
47.
Glaeser, E.L.2006. The economic impact of restricting housing supply. Policy Briefs PB-2006-3, Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston, Harvard University. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/rappaport/downloads/policybriefs/glaeserhousing_final.pdf.
48.
Glaeser, E.L., J. Gyourko, and R.E. Saks.2006. Urban growth and housing supply. Journal of Economic Geography6:71-89.
49.
Glaeser, E.L., M. Kahn, and C. Chu.2001. Job sprawl: Employment location in U.S. metropolitan areas. Washington, DC: Bookings Institution. http://www.brookings.edu/es/urban/publications/glaeserjobsprawl.pdf.
50.
Gordon, P., and H.W. Richardson .1997. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Journal of the American Planning Association63:95-106.
51.
Green, E.K., S. Malpezzi, and S.K. Mayo.2005. Metropolitan-specific estimates of the price elasticity of supply of housing, and their sources. American Economic Review95:334-9.
52.
Hanushek, E.A., and J.M. Quigley.1990. Commercial land use regulation and local government finance. The American Economic Review80:176-80.
53.
Henneberry, J., T. McGough, and F. Mouzakis.2005. Estimating the impact of planning on commercial property markets. In Planning, public policy and property markets, ed. D. Adams, C. Watkins, and M. White , 105-127. Oxford: Blackwell.
54.
Hopkins, L.D.2001. Urban development: The logic of making plans. Washington, DC: Island Press.
55.
Hughes, W.T. Jr., and C.F. Sirmans.1992. Traffic externalities and single-family housing prices. Journal of Regional Science32:487-500.
56.
Ihlanfeldt, K.R.2004. Exclusionary land-use regulations within suburban communities: A review of the evidence and policy prescriptions. Urban Studies41:261-83.
57.
Ihlanfeldt, K.R., and D.L. Sjoquist.2000. Geographic mismatch between jobs and housing. In The Atlanta Paradox, ed. D. L. Sjoquist, 116-57. New York: Russell Sage.
58.
Jun, M.J.2004. The effects of Portland’s urban growth boundary on urban development patterns and commuting. Urban Studies41:1333-48.
59.
Kim, J.H.2010. Land use planning as information production and exchange: An empirical analysis of the uncertainty reduction effect. Regional Economics Applications Laboratory Discussion Paper 10-T-5. http://www.real.illinois.edu/d-paper/10/10-T-5.pdf
60.
Kline, J.D., and R.J. Alig.1999. Does land use planning slow the conversion of forest and farm lands? Growth and Change30:3-22.
61.
Knaap, G.J., C. Ding, and L.D. Hopkins.2001. Do plans matter? The effects of light rail plans on land values in station areas. Journal of Planning Education and Research21:32-9.
62.
Knaap, G.J., and Y. Song.2004. The transportation-Land use policy connection. Paper prepared for the conference entitled ‘‘Access to Destination: Rethinking the Transportation Future of Our Region.’’http://www.smartgrowth.umd.edu/research/researchpapers-landuseandenvironment.htm (accessed June 7, 2009).
63.
Lafferty, R.N., and H.E. Frech.1978. Community environment and the market value of single family homes: The effect of the dispersion of land uses. Journal of Law and Economics21:381-94.
64.
Lee, D.B. Jr.1981. Land use planning as a response to market failure. In The land use policy debate in the United States, ed. J. I. de Neufville, 149-64. New York: Plenum Press.
65.
Levine, J.1998. Rethinking accessibility and jobs-housing balance. Journal of the American Planning Association64:133-49.
66.
---. 2006. Zoned out: Regulation, markets, and choices in transportation and metropolitan land-use. Washington, DC: RFF Press.
67.
Levine, N.1999. The effects of local growth controls on regional housing production and population redistribution in California. Urban Studies36:2047-68.
68.
Malpezzi, S.1996. Housing prices, externalities, and regulation in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Housing Research7:209-41.
69.
Mark, J.H., and M.A. Goldberg.1986. A study of the impacts of zoning on housing values over time. Journal of Urban Economics20:257-73.
70.
Maser, S.M., W.H. Riker, and R.N. Rosett.1977. The effects of zoning and externalities on the price of land: An empirical analysis of Monroe County, New York. Journal of Law and Economics20:111-32.
71.
Mayer, C.J., and C.T. Somerville .2000. Land use regulation and new construction. Regional Science and Urban Economics30:639-62.
72.
McMillen, D.P., and J.F. McDonald.1991. A Markov chain model of zoning change . Journal of Urban Economics30:257-70.
73.
Moe, R., and C. Wilkie.1997. Changing places: Rebuilding community in the age of sprawl. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
74.
Moore, T.1978. Why allow planners to do what they do? A justification from economic theory. Journal of the American Institute of Planners44:387-98.
75.
Moore, T., and A.C. Nelson.1994. Lessons for effective urban containment and resource land preservation policy. Journal of Urban Planning and Development120:157-71.
76.
Munneke, H.J.2005. Dynamics of the urban zoning structure: An empirical investigation of zoning change. Journal of Urban Economics58:455-73.
77.
Muro, M., and R. Puentes.2004. Investing in a better future: A review of the fiscal and competitive advantages of smarter growth development patterns . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution . http://www.brookings.edu/urban/pubs/200403_smartgrowth.pdf .
78.
Nelson, A.C.1999. Comparing states with and without growth management: Analysis based on indicators with policy implications. Land Use Policy16:121-7.
79.
Nelson, A.C., R.J. Burby, E. Feser, C.J. Dawkins, E.E. Malizia, and R. Quercia.2004. Urban containment and central-city revitalization . Journal of the American Planning Association70:411-25.
80.
Nelson, A.C., and T. Moore.1993. Assessing urban growth management: The case of Portland, Oregon, the USA’s largest urban growth boundary. Land Use Policy10:293-302.
81.
Nelson, A.C., and D.R. Peterman.2000. Does growth management matter? The effect of growth management on economic performance. Journal of Planning Education and Research19:277-85.
82.
Netusil, N.R.2005. The effect of environmental zoning and amenities on property values: Portland, Oregon. Land Economics81:227-46.
83.
1000 Friends of Oregon.1982. Making land use planning a part of the solution to Oregon’s economic recovery: A two year plan. Portland, OR: Author.
84.
Pendall, R.1999. Do land-use controls cause sprawl?Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26:555-71.
85.
Phillips, J., and E. Goodstein.2000. Growth management and housing prices: The case of Portland, Oregon. Contemporary Economic Policy18:334-44.
86.
Pogodzinski, J.M., and T.R. Sass.1991. Measuring the effects of municipal zoning regulations: A survey. Urban Studies28:597-621.
87.
Pollakowski, H.O., and S.M. Wachter.1990. The effects of land-use constraints on housing prices. Land Economics66:315-24.
88.
Quigley, J.M., and S. Raphael.2004. Is housing unaffordable? Why isn’t it more affordable? Journal of Economic Perspectives18:191-214.
89.
Quigley, J.M., and L.A. Rosenthal.2005. The effects of land use regulation on the price of housing: What do we know? What can we learn?Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research8:69-137.
90.
Razin, E., and M. Rosentraub.2000. Are fragmentation and sprawl interlinked?: NorthAmerican evidence. Urban Affairs Review35:821-36.
91.
Rodriguez, D.A., F. Targa, and S.A. Aytur.2006. Transport implications of urban containment policies: A study of the largest twenty-five U.S. metropolitan areas. Urban Studies43:1879-97.
92.
Rosenthal, S.S., and W.C. Strange.2004. Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economics. In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 4. Cities and geography, ed. J. V. Henderson and J. F. Thisse, 2119-171. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
93.
Rueter, F.H.1973. Externalities in urban property markets: An empirical test of the zoning ordinance of Pittsburgh. Journal of Law and Economics16:313-49.
94.
Saks, R.E.2008. Job creation and housing construction: Constraints on metropolitan area employment growth. Journal of Urban Economics64:178-95.
95.
Schaeffer, P.V., and L.D. Hopkins.1987. Behavior of land developers: Planning and the economics of information. Environment and Planning A19:1221-32.
96.
Shen, Q.1996. Spatial impacts of locally enacted growth controls: The San Francisco Bay Region in the 1980s. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design23:61-91.
97.
Siegan, B.1972. Land use without Zoning. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
98.
Spalatro, F., and B. Provencher.2001. An analysis of minimum frontage zoning to preserve lakefront amenities. Land Economics77:469-81.
99.
Stull, W.J.1975. Community environment, zoning, and the market value of single family homes. Journal of Law and Economics18:535-58.
100.
Talen, E.1996a. Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning . Journal of Planning Literature10:248-59.
101.
---. 1996b. After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research16:79-91.
102.
Thorson, J.A.1994. Zoning policy changes and the urban fringe land market . Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association22:527-38.
103.
---. 1997. The effect of zoning on housing construction. Journal of Housing Economics6:81-91.
104.
Tiebout, C.M.1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy64:416-24.
105.
Ulfarsson, G.F., and J.I. Carruthers .2006. The cycle of fragmentation and sprawl: A conceptual framework and empirical model. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design33:767-88.
106.
Vermeulen W., and J. van Ommeren.2008. Does land use planning shape regional economies? A simultaneous analysis of housing supply, internal migration and local employment growth in the Netherlands, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2008-004/3 http://www.tinbergen.nl/discussionpapers/08004.pdf
