Stressing relation-building and participatory communication approaches, the Rhode Island Coalition against Domestic Violence worked with journalists to develop a best practices handbook on news coverage of domestic violence murders. This study compares print coverage of domestic violence murders prehandbook (1996-1999) and posthandbook (2000-2002). Significant changes include increased labeling of the murder of intimates as domestic violence and doubled usage of advocates as sources. As a result, domestic violence murders, previously framed as unpredictable private tragedies, are more commonly framed posthandbook as social problems warranting public intervention. The authors conclude that relation-building approaches can affect news cultures and public discourse when conducted in conjunction with comprehensive participatory communications strategies.
Barker-Plummer, B. (1996). The dialogic of media and social movements. Peace Review: A Transnational Quarterly, 8(1), 27-35.
2.
Bart, P. B., & Moran, E. G. (1993). Violence against women: The bloody footprints. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Benedict, H. (1992). Virgin or vamp: How the press covers sex crimes. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Berkeley Media Studies Group. (2003). Distracted by drama: How California newspapers portray intimate partner violence. Retrieved September 26, 2005, from http://www.bmsg.org/pub-issues.php%23issue13
5.
Byerly, C. (1994). An agenda for teaching news coverage of rape. Journalism Educator, 49(1), 59-69.
6.
Bystydzienski, J., & Schacht, S. (2001). Forging radical alliances across difference: Coalition politics for the new millennium. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
7.
Caputi, J. (1993). The sexual politics of murder. In P. Bart & E. Moran (Eds.), Violence against women: The bloody footprints (pp. 5-25). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Croteau, D., & Hoynes, W. (2001). The business of media: Corporate media and the public interest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
9.
Dagron, A. G. (2001). Making waves: Stories of participatory communication for social change. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.
10.
Diani, M. (2000). The relational deficit of ideologically structured action. Mobilization: An International Journal, 5(1), 17-24.
11.
Freire, P. (1994). Introduction. In P. Riano (Ed.), Women in grassroots communication: Furthering social change (pp. 12-14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Gans, H. (2003). Democracy and the news. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Ghez, M. (1995, March). Communications and public education: Effective tools to promote a cultural change on domestic violence. Violence against Women Research Strategic Planning workshop, National Institute of Justice, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
15.
Herman, E. J., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon.
16.
hooks, b. (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. Boston: South End.
17.
Huesca, R. (1996). Diversity in communications for social change. Peace Review: A Transnational Quarterly, 8(1), 69-74.
18.
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Johnson, D. (1994). A dangerous pattern: Media coverage of violence against women in California. Unpublished manuscript.
20.
Jones, A. (1994). Next time she’ll be dead: Battering and how to stop it. Boston: Beacon.
21.
Kaniss, P. (1997). Making local news. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Kurtz, S. (2002). Workplace justice: Organizing multi-identity movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
Loseke, D. R. (1989). “Violence” is “violence”...orisit? The social construction of “wife abuse” and public policy. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (pp. 191-206). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
24.
McChesney, R. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
25.
Meyers, M. (1992). Reporters and beats: The making of oppositional news. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 9(1), 75-90.
26.
Meyers, M. (1997). News coverage of violence against women: Engendering blame. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Pagelow, M. D. (1981). Woman battering: Victims and their experiences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence. (2000). Domestic violence: A handbook for journalists. Warwick, RI: Author.
29.
Riano, P. (1994). Women in grassroots communication: Furthering social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Ryan, C. (1991). Prime time activism: Media strategies for grassroots organizing. Boston: South End.
31.
Ryan, C. (1996). Media war over welfare. Peace Review: A Transnational Quarterly, 8(1), 13-20.
32.
Ryan, C. (2004). It takes a movement to raise an issue: Media lessons from the 1997U. P.S. strike. Critical Sociology, 3, 483-512.
33.
Soley, L. (1992). The news shapers: The sources who explain the news. New York: Praeger.
34.
Soothill, K., & Walby, S. (1991). Sex crime in the news. London: Routledge.
35.
Tierney, K. J. (1982). The battered women movement and the creation of the wife-beating problem. Social Problems, 29, 207-219.
36.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the press: Critical studies in racism and migration. London: Routledge.
37.
White, S., Nair, K. S., &,! Ashcroft, J. (1994). Participatory communication: Working for change and development. New Delhi, India: Sage.
