The following study is an evaluation of the Moderate Intensity Family Violence Prevention Program (MIFVPP). The sample consisted of 298 male federal offenders who participated in the MIFVPP while incarcerated or on release within the community. Participants were assessed pre-, mid-, and postprogram using an assessment battery consisting of self-report questionnaires and facilitator-rated evaluation scales. Results of the study found uniform and significant (p < .001) improvement for pre and post program change in the self-report questionnaires and in the facilitator ratings. A positive improvement in motivation, whether assessed by the participant or facilitator, was associated with improvement in program outcomes and significant within, between, and interaction effects were found when participant program performance over time was compared among grouped postprogram ratings of motivation. The implication for the efficacy of addressing offender motivation to change in intimate partner violence (IPV) interventions is discussed.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.HogeR. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
3.
AndrewsD. A.DowdenC. (2007). The risk-need-responsivity model of assessment and human service in prevention and corrections: Crime-prevention jurisprudence. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 49, 439-464.
4.
BabcockJ. C.GreenC. E.RobieC. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023-1053.
5.
BabcockJ. C.SteinerR. (1999). The relationship between treatment, incarceration, and recidivism of battering: A program evaluation of Seattle’s coordinated community response to domestic violence. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 46-59.
6.
BoerD. P.KronerD. G.WongS.CadskyO. (1993). Assessing the dysfunctional beliefs of spouse assaulters: Development and validation of the Abusive Relationships Inventory. (Unpublished manuscript).
7.
BowenE.GilchristE. (2004). Do court- and self-referred domestic violence offenders share the same characteristics? A preliminary comparison of motivation to change, locus of control and anger. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 279-294.
8.
BowenE.GilchristE. (2006). Predicting drop-out of court mandated treatment in a British sample of domestic violence offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 573-587.
9.
ChambersJ.EcclestonL.DayA.WardT.HowellsK. (2008). Treatment readiness in violent offenders: The influence of cognitive factors on engagement in violence programs. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 276-284.
10.
Correctional Service Canada. (2001). Assessment manual for the moderate and high intensity family violence prevention programs. Ottawa, ON: Reintegration Programs Division. Revised2006.
11.
CortoniF.NunesK.LatendresseM. (2006). An examination of the effectiveness of the Violence Prevention Program (Research Report No. R-178). Ottawa, ON: Correctional Service of Canada.
12.
CunninghamA.JaffeP. G.BakerL.DickT.MallaS.MazaheriN.PoissonS. (1998). Theory-derived explanations of male violence against female partners: Literature update and related implications for treatment and evaluation. London, Ontario, Canada: London Family Court Clinic.
13.
DanielsJ. W.MurphyC. M. (1997). Stages of change in batterers’ treatment. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 4, 123-145.
14.
DavisR. C.TaylorB. G. (1999). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A synthesis of the literature. Women & Criminal Justice, 10, 69-93.
15.
DayA.ChungD.O’LearyP.CarsonE. (2009). Programs for men who perpetrate domestic violence: An examination of the issues underlying the effectiveness of intervention programs. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 203-212.
16.
DobashR. P.DobashR. E.CavanaghK.LewisR. (1999). A research evaluation of British programmes for violent men. Journal of Social Policy, 28, 205-233.
17.
DuttonD. G.CorvoK. (2006). Transforming a flawed policy: A call to revive psychology and science in domestic violence research and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 457-483.
18.
DuttonD. G.HartS. D. (1992). Risk markers for family violence in a federally incarcerated population. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 15, 101-112.
19.
EckhardtC.Holtzworth-MunroeA.NorlanderB.SibleyA.CahillM. (2008). Readiness to change, partner violence subtypes and treatment for partner assault. Violence and Victims, 23, 446-475.
FederL.WilsonD.B. (2005). A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior?Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 239-262.
22.
Garcia-MorenoC.HeiseL.JansenH. A. F. M.EllsbergM.WattsC. (2006). Violence against women. Science, 310, 1282-1283.
23.
GondolfE. W. (2000). Mandatory court review and batterer program compliance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 428-437.
24.
HambergerL. K.HastingsJ. E. (1988). Skills training for treatment of spouse abusers: An outcome study. Journal of Family Violence, 3, 121-130.
25.
HansonR. K.BussiereM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-372.
26.
HupkaR. B.RuschP. A. (2001). Interpersonal Relationship Scale. In PerlmutterB.F.TouliatosJ.HoldenG. W. (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques: Instruments and Index: Vol. 3. (pp. 148-150). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
JoeG. W.SimpsonD. D.BroomeK. M. (1998). Effects of readiness for drug abuse treatment on client retention and assessment of process. Addiction, 93, 1177-1190.
28.
KistenmacherB. R.WeissR. L. (2009). Motivational interviewing as a mechanism for change in men who batter: A randomized controlled trial. In MurphyC. M.MaiuroR. D. (Eds.), Motivational interviewing and stages of change in intimate partner violence (pp. 25-42). New York, NY: Springer.
KroppR. P.LeeZ. (2004). Evaluation of the Correctional Service of Canada Family Violence Prevention Programs: Final report. Vancouver, Canada: B.C. Institute Against Family Violence.
31.
LevesqueD. A.GellesR. J.VelicerW. F. (2000). Development and validation of a stage of change measure for men in batterer treatment. Cognitive Therapy Research, 24, 175-199.
32.
LevesqueD. A.VelicerW. F.CastleP. H.GreeneR. N. (2008). Resistance among domestic violence offenders: Measurement development and initial validation. Violence Against Women, 14, 158-184.
33.
MarshallW. L.ThorntonD.MarshallL. E.FernandezY. M.MannR. (2001). Treatment of sexual offenders who are in categorical denial: A pilot project. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 205-215.
34.
McMurranM. (2002). Motivation to change: Selection criterion or treatment need? In McMurranM. (Ed.), Motivating offenders to change (pp. 1-14). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
35.
MillerW. R.RollnickS. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Guilford
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithJ. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment dropout and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 6-21.
38.
PenceE.PaymarM. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York, NY: Springer.
39.
ProchaskaJ. O.DiClementeC. C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy. Toward a more integrated model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 19, 276-288.
40.
ProchaskaJ. O.LevesqueD. A. (2002). Enhancing motivation of offenders at each stage of change and phase of therapy. In McMurranM. (Ed.), Motivating offenders to change (pp. 57-74). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
41.
RosenfeldB. D. (1992). Court-ordered treatment of spouse abuse. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 205-226.
42.
SartinR. MHansenD. J.HussM. T. (2006). Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: A review and implications for the study of family violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 425-440.
43.
SaundersD. G. (2008). Group interventions for men who batter: A summary of program descriptions and research. Violence and Victims, 23, 156-172.
44.
StithS.SmithD.PennC. E.WardD.TrittD. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 65-98.
45.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence and consequences of violence against women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
46.
WhiteR. J.GondolfE. W.RobertsonD. U.GoodwinB. J.CaraveoL. E. (2002). Extent and characteristics of woman batterers among federal inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 412-426.
