Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-9
The Effects of Risky Places,Motivated Offenders,and Social Disorganization on Sexual Victimization: A Microgeographic- and Neighborhood-Level Examination
We test microgeographic (i.e., street segment) effects reflective of routine activities/lifestyle theories (e.g., the locations of sex offenders, gang members, drug houses, bars) and neighborhood-level (i.e., block group) effects consistent with social disorganization theory (e.g., socioeconomic disadvantage, residential mobility, racial heterogeneity) on the locations of sexual offenses within one rural and one suburban city. We employ multilevel modeling to examine neighborhood (N = 41) and microgeographic (N = 1,382) effects on sex offenses. Neighborhood context was associated with the locations of sex offenses in which disadvantage, concentrated poverty, racial heterogeneity, violent crime rates, and suburban (vs. rural) areas were positively associated with sex offense rates, whereas residential mobility had a negative effect on sex offense rates. Microgeographic context also explained variation in sex offense rates in which gang members, sex offenders, drug houses, and high population housing communities had positive effects on sexual assault rates, while controlling for spatially lagged effects. Finally, the effect of high-density housing communities was moderated by the level of disadvantage and racial heterogeneity. Neighborhood context and variables linked to exposure to crime operate differently in nonurban areas. Beyond considering community-based characteristics, contextual characteristics related to potential victims’ exposure to motivated offenders should focus on small spatial places.
BarnettC.MenckenF. C. (2002). Social disorganization theory and the contextual nature of crime in nonmetropolitan counties. Rural Sociology, 67, 372-393.
2.
BaronL.StrausM. (1989). Four theories of rape in American society a state level analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure (Vol. 7). New York: Free Press.
4.
BouffardL. A.MufticL. R. (2006). The rural mystique: Social disorganization and violence beyond urban communities. Western Criminology Review, 7(3), 56-66.
5.
BrantinghamP.BrantinghamP. (1995). Criminality of place: Crime generator and crime attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 13, 5-26.
6.
CahillM.MulliganG. (2007). Using geographically weighted regression to explore local crime patterns. Social Science Computer Review, 25, 174-194.
7.
CassA. I. (2007). Routine activities and sexual assault: An analysis of individual and school-level factors. Violence and Victims, 22, 350-366.
8.
CeccatoV. (2014). The nature of rape places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 97-107.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-605.
11.
CurmanA. S. N.AndresenM. A.BrantinghamP. J. (2014). Crime and place: A longitudinal examination of street segment patterns in Vancouver, BC. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 127-147.
12.
DeLeon-GranadosW. (1999). Travels through crime and place: Community building as crime control. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
13.
DuweG.DonnayW.TewksburyR. (2008). Does residential proximity matter? A geographic analysis of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 484-504.
14.
EckJ. E. (1994). Drug markets and drug places: A case-control study of the spatial structure of illicit drug dealing (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park.
15.
FelsonM. (1995). Those who discourage crime. In EckJ. E.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Crime and place: Crime prevention studies (Vol. 4, pp. 53-66). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
16.
FinkelhorD.AsdigianN. (1996). Risk factors for youth victimization: Beyond a lifestyles/routine activities theory approach. Violence and Victims, 11, 3-19.
17.
FisherB. S.DaigleL. E.CullenF. T. (2010). Unsafe in the ivory tower: The sexual victimization of college women. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Forber-PrattA. J.EspelageD. L. (2018). Sexual violence in K-12 settings. In ShapiroH. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook on violence in education: Forms, factors, and preventions (pp. 287-302). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
19.
FoxK. A. (2017). Gangs, gender, and violent victimization. Victims and Offenders, 12, 43-70.
20.
GibsonC. L. (2012). An investigation of neighborhood disadvantage, low self-control, and violent victimization among youth. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10, 41-63.
21.
GreenfeldL. A. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
22.
HilbeJ. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23.
HindelangM. J.GottfredsonM. R.GarofaloJ. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
24.
JohnsonL. M.DaigleL. E.NapperS. (2017). Precautionary behavior and violent victimization: Do safer drinking strategies reduce risk?Victims and Offenders, 12, 381-400.
25.
KornhauserR. R. (1978). Social sources of delinquency: An appraisal of analytic models. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
LeeM. R.MaumeM. O.OuseyG. C. (2003). Social isolation and lethal violence across the metro/nonmetro divide: The effects of socioeconomic disadvantage and poverty concentration on homicide. Rural Sociology, 68, 107-131.
27.
LeeM. R.OuseyG. C. (2005). Institutional access, residential segregation, and urban Black homicide. Social Inquiry, 75, 31-54.
28.
LiptonR.YangX.BragaA. A.GoldstickJ.NewtonM.RuraM. (2013). The geography of violence, alcohol outlets, and drug arrests in Boston. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 657-664.
29.
LundriganS.CzarnomskiS. (2006). Spatial characteristics of serial sexual assault in New Zealand. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39, 218-231.
30.
MasseyD. S. (2001). The prodigal paradigm returns: Ecology comes back to sociology. In BoothA.CrouterA. (Eds.), Does it take a village? Community effects on children, adolescents, and families (pp. 41-48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
MietheT. D.McDowallD. (1993). Contextual effects in models of criminal victimization. Social Forces, 71, 741-759.
32.
MietheT. D.MeierR. F. (1990). Opportunity, choice, and criminal victimization: A test of a theoretical model. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 27, 243-266.
33.
MorganR. E.KenaG. (2017). Criminal victimization, 2016. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
34.
MustaineE. E.TewksburyR. (1998). Predicting risks of larceny theft victimization: A routine activity analysis using refined lifestyle measures. Criminology, 36, 829-858.
35.
ParksK. A.Zetes-ZanattaL. M. (1999). Women’s bar-related victimization: Refining and testing a conceptual model. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 349-364.
36.
PetersonR. D.BaileyW. C. (1988). Forcible rape, poverty and economic inequality in U.S. metropolitan communities. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 99-119.
37.
PlantyM.LangtonL.KrebsC.BerzofskyM.Smiley-McDonaldH. (2013). Female victims of sexual violence, 1994-2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
38.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage.
39.
ReynsB. W.HensonB.FisherB. S. (2015). A gendered lifestyle-routine activity approach to explaining stalking victimization in Canada. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 1719-1743.
40.
RhodesW. M.ConlyC. (1981). Crime and mobility: An empirical study. In BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 167-188). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
RodriguezN.GriffinM. L. (2005). Gender differences in drug market activities: A comparative assessment of men and women’s participation in the drug market. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
42.
SampsonR. J.GrovesW. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Society of Sociology, 94, 774-802.
43.
SandayP. R. (1981). The socio-cultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 5-7.
44.
ScribnerR. A.MacKinnonD. P.DwyerJ. H. (1995). The risk of assaultive violence and alcohol availability in Los Angeles County. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 335-340.
45.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: A study of rates of delinquents in relation to different characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
SnowdenA. J.HockinS.PridemoreW. A. (2020). The neighborhood-level association between alcohol outlet density and female criminal victimization rates. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(15-16), 2639-2662. doi:10.1177/0886260517719080
47.
TaylorT.PetersonD.EsbensenF.FrengA. (2007). Gang membership as a risk factor for adolescent violent victimization. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 44, 351-380.
48.
TewksburyR.MustaineE. E.CovingtonM. (2010). Offender presence, available victims, social disorganization and sex offense rates. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 1-14.
49.
TravisJ. (1998). Criminal behavior of gang members and at-risk youths (National institute of justice research preview). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
50.
TuranovicJ. J.ReisigM. D.PrattT. C. (2015). Risky lifestyles, low self-control, and violent victimization across gendered pathways to crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 183-206.
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2016). Crime in the United States, 2016. Clarksburg, WV.
54.
WebsdaleN. (1995). Rural woman abuse: The voices of Kentucky women. Violence Against Women, 1, 309-338.
55.
WebsdaleN. (1998). Rural woman battering and the justice system: An ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
WeisburdD.BushwayS.LumC.YangS. (2004). Trajectories of crime and place: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42, 283-322.
57.
WellsL. E.WeisheitR. A. (2001). Gang problems in nonmetropolitan areas: A longitudinal assessment. Justice Quarterly, 18, 791-823.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
