Previous research has explored offline intimate partner violence from an evolutionary perspective, primarily focusing on the role of individual differences in perpetration and victimization. However, a current form of intimate partner violence is digital dating abuse, which involves abuse toward a romantic partner, occuring online through the use of electronic communication technology. This form of abuse differs from offline abuse, in that physical proximity is not required. Although research has focused on the effects digital dating abuse has on victims, little research has focused on the perpetration of digital dating abuse. This is important as research focused on perpetration can inform a wide range of initiatives geared toward understanding the factors which drive this behavior. Recent research has focused on evolutionary mating-relevant factors that drive the perpetration of digital dating abuse. Here, we extended and replicated previous work by reporting two studies (study 1, n = 114; study 2, n = 162) which explored the roles of mate value discrepancy, intrasexual competition, and relationship-contingent self-esteem in the perpetration of digital dating abuse. We found that mate value discrepancy (studies 1 and 2) and intrasexual competition (study 2) positively predicted the perpetration of digital dating abuse. To our knowledge, this article is the first to provide support that those who report high intrasexual competition, engage in greater levels of digital dating abuse, thus furthering theoretical advancements in this field by showing digital dating abuse is a mate retention tactic. Our findings further our understanding of online behavior in romantic relationships through an evolutionary psychological lens.
ArnockyS., AlbertG., CarréJ. M., & OrtizT. L. (2018). Intrasexual competition mediates the relationship between men’s testosterone and mate retention behavior. Physiology and Behavior, 186, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.01.007
2.
ArnockyS., SunderaniS., & VaillancourtT. (2013). Mate-poaching and mating success in humans. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 11(2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.11.2013.2.2
3.
ArnockyS., SunderaniS., AlbertG., & NorrisK. (2014). Sex differences and individual differences in human facilitative and preventive courtship. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 8(2), 210–221.
4.
AtariM. (2017). Assessment of long-term mate preferences in Iran. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917702459
5.
AtariM., & JamaliR. (2016). Dimensions of women’s mate preferences: Validation of a mate preference scale in Iran. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916651443
6.
BennettD. C., GuranE. L., RamosM. C., & MargolinG. (2011). College students’ electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: Anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors. Violence and Victims, 26(4), 410–429. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.26.4.410.
7.
BhogalM. S., & HowmanJ. M. (2019). Mate value discrepancy and attachment anxiety predict the perpetration of digital dating abuse. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 151, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109552
8.
BhogalM. S., RheadC., & TudorC. (2019). Understanding digital dating abuse from an evolutionary perspective: Further evidence for the role of mate value discrepancy. Personality and Individual Differences, 151. https://doi/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109552
9.
BorrajoE., Gámez-GuadixM., & CalveteA. (2015). Cyber dating abuse: Prevalence, context, and relationship with offline dating aggression. Psychological Reports, 116(2), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.2466/21.16.PR0.116k22w4
10.
BremM. J., SpillerL. C., & VandeheyM. A. (2014). Online mate-retention tactics on Facebook are associated with relationship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(16), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514554286
11.
BrownC., & HegartyK. (2018). Digital dating abuse measures: A critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 40, 44–59. https://doi/10.1016/j.avb.2018.03.003
12.
BurkeS. C., WallenM., Vail-SmithK., & KnoxD. (2011). Using technology to control intimate partners: An exploratory study of college undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1162–1167. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.010
13.
BussD. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.4.616
14.
BussD. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14.
15.
BussD. M., & DeddenL. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(3), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0265407590073006
16.
BuunkA. P., & FisherM. (2009). Individual differences in intrasexual competition. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(1), 37–48. https://doi/10.1556/JEP.7.2009.1.5
17.
DavisA. C., DesrochersJ. E., DiFilippoA., VaillancourtT., & ArnockyS. (2018). Type of jealousy differentially predicts cost-inflicting and benefit-provisioning mate retention. Personal Relationships, 25(4), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12262
18.
DeansH., & BhogalM. S. (2019). Perpetrating cyber dating abuse: A brief report on the role of aggression, romantic jealousy and gender. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 38(5), 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9715-4
19.
EarpB. D., & TrafimowD. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621
20.
EdlundJ. E., & SagarinB. (2014). The mate value scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 74–77.
21.
ElphinstonR. A., & NollerP. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(11), 631–635. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0318
22.
FettermanA. K., & SassenbergK. (2015). The reputational consequences of failed replications and wrongness admission among scientists. PloS One, 10(12), Article e0143723. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400
23.
FisherM., CoxA., BennettS., & GavricD. (2008). Components of self-perceived mate value. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(4), 156–168. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0099347
24.
GoetzC. D., & MariaN. M. (2019). Who gets mad and who feels bad? Mate value discrepancies predict anger and shame in response transgressions in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(10), 2963–2982. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0265407518808092
25.
Graham-KevanN., & ArcherJ. (2009). Control tactics and partner violence in heterosexual relationships. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 445–452.
26.
HancockK., KeastH., & EllisW. (2017). The impact of cyber dating abuse on self-esteem: The mediating role of emotional distress. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-2-2
27.
HenrichJ., HeineS. J., & NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.
28.
HeymanR. E., & SlepA. M. S. (2002). Do child abuse and interparental violence lead to adulthood family violence? Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 864–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00864.x
29.
HoldenC. J., Zeigler-HillV., PhamM., & ShackelfordT. K. (2014). Personality features and mate retention strategies: Honesty-humility and the willingness to manipulate, deceive and exploit romantic partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 31–36.
30.
HoldenC. J., Zeigler-HillV., ShackelfordT. K., & WellingL. L. M. (2018). The impact of relationship-contingent self-esteem on mate retention and reactions to threat. Personal Relationships, 25(4), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12255
31.
JonasonP. K., LiN. P., & BussD. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of the dark triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 373–378. https://doi/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.003
32.
KarimiF., & EsmaeilinasabM. (2019). Religiosity, intrasexual rivalry, and mate retention behaviors in Iran. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 135–140.
KeysE., & BhogalM. S. (2018). Mean girls: Provocative clothing leads to intra-sexual competition between females. Current Psychology, 37(3), 543–551.
35.
KirsnerB. R., FigueredoA. J., & JacobsW. J. (2003). Self, friends, and lovers: Structural relations among beck depression inventory scores and perceived mate values. Journal of Affective Disorders, 75(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00048-4
36.
KneeC. R., CanevelloA., AmspokerA. B., & CookA. (2008). Relationship-contingent self-esteem and the ups and downs of romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 608–627.
37.
LarsenM. M. (2016). Theoretical & Empirical Perspectives on Intimate Partner Violence. In LarsenM. (Ed.), Health Inequities Related to Intimate Partner Violence against Women, Social Disparities in Health and Health Care (pp. 13-29). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29565-7_2
38.
LenhartA., YbarraM., ZickuhrK., & Price-FeeneyM. (2017). Online harassment, digital abuse, and cyberstalking in America. Data & Society Research Institute, Center for Innovative Public Health and Research. https://datasociety.net/pubs/oh/Intimate_Partner_Digital_Abuse_2017.pdf
39.
LewisS. F., TraveaL., & FremouwW. J. (2002). Characteristics of female perpetrators and victims of dating violence. Violence and Victims, 17(5), 593–606.
40.
LuY., OutyselJ. V., WalraveM., PonnetK., & TempleJ. R. (2018). Cross-sectional and temporal associations between cyber dating abuse victimization and mental health and substance use outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 65, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.02.009
41.
MachimbarrenaJ. M., CalveteE., Fernández-GonzálezL., Álvarez-BardónA., Álvarez-FernándezL., & González-CabreraJ. (2018). Internet risks: An overview of victimization in cyberbullying, cyber dating abuse, sexting, online grooming and problematic internet use. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(11), 2471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112471
42.
MinerE. J., StarrattV. G., & ShackelfordT. K. (2009). It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(3), 214–218. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.002
43.
MunafòM. R., NosekB. A., BishopD. V. M., ButtonK. S., ChambersC. D., Percie Du SertN., SimonsohnU., WagenmakersE.-J., WareJ. J., & IoannidisJ. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behavior, 1(1), 1–9.
44.
MunafòM. R., & SmithG. D. (2018). Robust research needs many lines of evidence. Nature, 553(7689), 399–401. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-01023-3
45.
NosekB. A., SpiesJ. R., & MotylM. (2012). Scientific utopia II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 615–631.
46.
PatchinJ. W., & HindujaS. (2011). Traditional and non-traditional bullying among youth: A test of general strain theory. Youth & Society, 43(2), 727–751. https://doi/10.1177/0044118X10366951
47.
PazhoohiF., JahromiA. S., & DoyleJ. F. (2016). Mate retention tactics decline with age of Iranian men. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(3), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0046-8
48.
PendersB., HolbrookJ. B., & de RijckeS. (2019). Rinse and repeat: Understanding the value of replication across different ways of knowing. Publications, 7(3), 52.
49.
PiazzaJ., & BeringJ. M. (2009). Evolutionary cyber-psychology: Applying an evolutionary framework to internet behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1258–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.002
50.
PoloP., FernandezA., Muñoz-ReyesJ. A., DufeyA., & BuunkP. (2018). Intrasexual competition and height in adolescents and adults. Evolutionary Psychology, 16(1), https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1474704917749172
51.
ReedL. A., TolmanR. M., & SafyerP. (2015). Too close for comfort: Attachment insecurity and electronic intrusion in college students’ dating relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 50. https://doi/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.050
52.
ReedL. A., TolmanR. M., & WardL. M. (2016). Gender matters: Experiences and consequences of digital dating abuse victimization in adolescent dating relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 59, 79–89.
53.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
54.
SchnurrM. P., MahatmyaD., BascheR. A. . (2013). The role of dominance, cyber aggression perpetration, and gender on emerging adults’ perpetration of intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 70–83. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0030601
55.
SellersC. S., CochranJ. K., & BranchK. A. (2005). Social learning theory and partner violence: A research note. Deviant Behavior, 26, 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/016396290931669
56.
SmithK., CénatJ. M., LapierreA., DionJ., Hébert.M., & CôtéK. (2018). Cyber dating violence: Prevalence and correlates among high school students from small urban areas in Quebec. Journal of Affective Disorders, 234, 220–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.043
57.
StonardK. E., BowenE., LawrenceT. R., & PriceS. A. (2014). The relevance of technology to the nature, prevalence and impact of adolescent dating violence and abuse: A research synthesis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 390–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.005
58.
StonardK. E., BowenE., WalkerK., & PriceS. A. (2015). “They’ll always find a way to get to you” technology use in adolescent romantic relationships and its role in dating violence and abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(14), 2083–2117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515590787
59.
TaylorS., & XiaY. (2018). Cyber partner abuse: A systematic review. Violence and Victims, 33, 983–1011.
60.
TetenA. L., BallB., ValleL. A., NoonanR., & RosenbluthB. (2009). Considerations for the definition, measurement, consequences, and prevention of dating violence victimization among adolescent girls. Journal of Women’s Health, 18(7), 923–927. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1515
61.
Van OuytselJ., PonnetK., & WalgraveM. (2020). Cyber dating abuse: Investigating digital monitoring behaviors among adolescents from a social learning perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(23–24), 5157–5178.
62.
Van OuytselJ., PonnetK., WalraveM., & d’HaenensL. (2017). Adolescent sexting from a social learning perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.009
63.
VazireS. (2018). Implications of the credibility revolution for productivity, creativity, and progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417.
64.
VilloraB., YuberoS., & NavarroR. (2019). Cyber dating abuse and masculine gender norms in a sample of male adults. Future Internet, 11(4), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi11040084
65.
WrightM. F. (2015). Cyber aggression within adolescents’ romantic relationships: Linkages to parental and partner attachment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(1), 37–47. https://doi/10.1007/s10964-014-0147-2
66.
Zeigler-HillV., & WallaceM. T. (2011). Self-esteem instability and psychological adjustment. Self and Identity, 11(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2011.567763
67.
ZweigJ. M., DankM., YahnerJ., & LachmanP. (2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(7), 1063–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8
