Despite the adverse effects of sexual harassment, measurement gaps persist. Using a sequential, mixed-methods approach, we adapted and validated the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ) to measure sexual harassment victimization among college-going women in Jordan. From a 213-item pool and qualitative data from students at the study site, we removed 50 items and collapsed or rephrased 163 items into selected 27 items for examination. After expert reviewers and study-site staff assessed content validity, we replaced three items. Items were tested using cognitive interviews (n = 7) and then administered in a survey to 567 women students. We sequentially performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with a random split-half sample (N1 = 283), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with the second sample (N2 = 284), and confirmatory bifactor analysis. Five items with cross-factor loadings were dropped. Model fit for the final four-factor EFA and CFA was adequate (EFA: RMSEA: 0.013, CFI: 0.996, TLI: 0.994; CFA: RMSEA 0.020, CFI: 0.988, TLI: 0.986). Three factors were similar to those identified in the SEQ—gender harassment, sexual coercion, and unwanted sexual attention—but we also identified a fourth factor—physical-contact sexual harassment. The bifactor analysis suggested that the scale was unidimensional (general factor ECV=.701 and PUC =.727). The unidimensional scale was positively associated with depressive symptoms. Using an adapted SEQ, sexual harassment is a measurable construct in the Jordanian university context. Further validation of this tool and efforts to capture each dimension of sexual harassment in the Arab region is needed.
Al-HussainS. M.Al-HaidariM. S.KouriN. A.El-MigdadiF.Al-SafarR. S.MohammadM. A. (2008). Prevalence of mistreatment and justice of grading system in five health related faculties in Jordan University of Science and Technology. Medical Teacher, 30(3), e82-e86.
2.
AljerianK.AlmadaniA.AlharbiS. S. (2017). Study on the existence and extent of harassment among medical staff in a Saudi University Hospital. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(6), 45.
3.
Al-ModallalH. (2010). Screening depressive symptoms in Jordanian women: Evaluation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D). Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 31(8), 537-544.
4.
Arab Renaissance for Democracy and Development (ARDD). (2018). Silent women: ARDD’s Report on harassment problem in the workplace. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/67519.pdf
5.
BandalosD.FinneyS. (2010). Factor analysis-exploratory and confirmatory. In HancockG.MuellerR. (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 93-114). Routledge.
6.
BarakA. (1997). Cross-cultural perspectives on sexual harassment. In O’DonohueW. (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 263-300). Allyn & Bacon.
7.
BeattyP. C.WillisG. B. (2007). Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 287-311.
8.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238.
9.
BerdahlJ. L. (2007). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 641-658.
10.
BergenfeldI.CislaghiB.YountK. M.EssaidA. A.SajdiJ.TalebR. A.MorrowG. L.D’SouzaJ. S.SpencerR. A.ClarkC. J. (2021). Diagnosing norms surrounding sexual harassment at a Jordanian University. Frontiers in Sociology, 6(152). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.667220
11.
BergenfeldI.ClarkC. J.SandhuS.YountK.EssaidA.SajdiJ.TalebR. A.RobbinZ.BatayehB.ZwooqarA.SpencerR. A. (under review). Perspectives on sexual harassment at a Jordanian university: A social-ecological analysis.
12.
BoatengG. O.NeilandsT. B.FrongilloE. A.Melgar-QuinonezH. R.YoungS. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Front Public Health, 6, 149.
13.
BouhlilaD. S. (2019). Sexual harassment and domestic violence in the Middle East and North Africa. https://www.arabbarometer.org/?report=sexual-harassment-and-domestic-violence-in-the-middle-east-and-north-africa
14.
BrownT. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
15.
CattellR. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245-276.
16.
ÇelikY.ÇelikS. Ş. (2007). Sexual harassment against nurses in Turkey. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 200-206.
17.
ChadwickS. B.BurkeS. M.GoldeyK. L.BellS. N.van AndersS. M. (2017). Sexual desire in sexual minority and majority women and men: The multifaceted sexual desire questionnaire. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(8), 2465-2484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0895-z
18.
CookK. F.KallenM. A.AmtmannD. (2009). Having a fit: Impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT’s unidimensionality assumption. Quality of Life Research, 18(4), 447-460.
19.
CortinaL. M. (2001). Assessing sexual harassment among Latinas: Development of an instrument. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7(2), 164-181.
20.
(DOS), Department of Statistics ICF. (2019). Jordan population and family and health survey 2017-18. www.dos.gov.jo/dos_home_a/main/linked-html/DHS2017_en.pdf
21.
DeVellisR. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed., Vol. 26). Sage.
22.
El DeebB. (2013). Study on ways and methods to eliminate sexual harassment in Egypt. https://gisf.ngo/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/2172-UN-Women-2013-Study-on-Ways-and-Methods-to-Eliminate-Sexual-Harassment-in-Egypt.pdf
23.
El FekiS.HeilmanB.BarkerG. (2017). Understanding masculinities: Results from the international men and gender equality survey (IMAGES)—Middle East and North Africa. https://imagesmena.org/en/
24.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (1980). Guidelines on dis-crimination because of sex. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2011-title29-vol4/xml/CFR-2011-title29-vol4-part1604.xml
25.
EssaidA.SajdiJ.Abu TalebR.SpencerR. A.YountK. M.BergenfeldI.ClarkC. J. (n.d.). Sexual Harassment in Jordan: Perspectives from a University Setting.
26.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2014). Violence against women: An EU-wide survey. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2014/violence-against-women-eu-wide-survey-main-results-report
27.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T. (2011). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
28.
FADFED. (2013). About FADFED. Retrieved June 13, 2021, from https://www.fad-fed.org/
29.
FarhaS. A. (2015). Survey finds frequent sexual harassment on Jordan’s campuses. Al-Fanar Media. Retrieved September 16, from http://www.al-fanarmedia.org/2015/09/survey-finds-frequent-sexual-harassment-on-jordans-campuses/
30.
FerketichS. (1991). Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 14(2), 165-168.
31.
FitzgeraldL. F.GelfandM. J.DrasgowF. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 425-445.
32.
FitzgeraldL. F.MagleyV. J.DrasgowF.WaldoC. R. (1999). Measuring sexual harassment in the military: The sexual experiences questionnaire (SEQ— DoD). Military Psychology, 11(3), 243-263.
33.
FitzgeraldL. F.ShullmanS. L.BaileyN.RichardsM.SweckerJ.GoldY.OrmerodM.WeitzmanL. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32(2), 152-175. http://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(88)90012-7
34.
GelfandM. J.FitzgeraldL. F.DrasgowF. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47(2), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1995.1033
35.
GerbingD. W.HamiltonJ. G. (1996). Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(1), 62-72.
36.
GoussousS. (2016). Activists rally in Amman against harassment. http://www.jor-dantimes.com/news/local/activists-rally-amman-against-harassment
37.
GruberJ. E. (1992). A typology of personal and environmental sexual harassment: Research and policy implications for the 1990s. Sex Roles, 26(11-12), 447-464.
38.
GruberJ. E.SmithM.Kauppinen-ToropainenK. (1996). Sexual harassment types and severity: Linking research and policy. In StockdaleM. S. (Ed.), Sexual harassment in the workplace: Perspectives, frontiers, and response strategies (pp. 151–173). Sage.
39.
GutekB. A.MurphyR. O.DoumaB. (2004). A review and critique of the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ). Law and Human Behavior, 28(4), 457-482. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000039335.96042.26
40.
HannanA.HeckertJ.James-HawkinsL.YountK. M. (2020). Cognitive interviewing to improve women’s empowerment questions in surveys: Application to the health and nutrition and intrahousehold relationships modules for the project-level Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 16(1), e12871.
41.
HenninkM.HutterI.BaileyA. (2011). Qualitative research methods. SAGE.
42.
HillC., & KearlH. (2011). Crossing the line: Sexual harassment at school. ERIC.
43.
HollandK. J., & CortinaL. M. (2016). Sexual harassment: Undermining the well-being of working women. In Handbook on well-being of working women (pp. 83-101). Springer.
44.
HuL.-t.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
45.
Information and Research Center—King Hussein Foundation. (2020). Desk review gender based violence in Jordan (GBV) women with disabilities and GBV in Jordan.
46.
KamalA.TariqN. (1997). Sexual harassment experience questionnaire for workplaces of Pakistan: Development and validation. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 12(1-2), 1-20.
47.
KrebsC.LindquistC.BerzofskyM.Shook-SaB.PetersonK.PlantyM.LangtonL.StroopJ. (2016). Campus climate survey validation study: Final technical report. BJS, Office of Justice Programs. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/campus-climate-survey-validation-study-ccsvs-final-technical-report
48.
KulczyckiA.WindleS. (2011). Honor killings in the Middle East and North Africa: A systematic review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 17(11), 1442-1464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211434127
49.
LeskinenE. A.CortinaL. M.KabatD. B. (2011). Gender harassment: Broadening our understanding of sex-based harassment at work. Law and Human Behavior, 35(1), 25-39.
50.
MagleyV. J.HulinC. L.FitzgeraldL. F.DeNardoM. (1999). Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 390-402.
51.
McDonaldR. P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology Press.
52.
MiedemaS., HenninkM., NavedR., TalukderA., DoreE., & YountK. (2021). Women’s income-generating activity and experiences of economic intimate partner violence in rural Bangladesh. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01225-6
53.
MurdochM.McGovernP. G. (1998). Measuring sexual harassment: Development and validation of the sexual harassment inventory. Violence and Victims, 13(3), 203-216.
OrmeJ. G.ReisJ. (1991). Multiple regression with missing data. Journal of Social Service Research, 15(1-2), 61-91.
57.
OrtegaR.SánchezV.Ortega-RiveraJ.NocentiniA.MenesiniE. (2010). Peer sexual harassment in adolescent girls: A cross-national study (Spain-Italy). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10(2), 245-264.
58.
PinaA.GannonT.SaundersB. (2009). An overview of the literature on sexual harassment: Perpetrator, theory, and treatment issues. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 14(2), 126-138.
59.
QutteinaY.James-HawkinsL.Al-KhelaifiB.YountK. M. (2019). Meanings of women’s agency: A case study from Qatar on improving measurement in context. Journal of Arabian Studies, 9(1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/21534764.2019.1649828
60.
RanganathanM.WamoyiJ.PearsonI.StöcklH. (2021). Measurement and prevalence of sexual harassment in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 11(6), e047473. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047473
61.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. Routledge.
62.
ReiseS. P.BonifayW. E.HavilandM. G. (2013a). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129-140.
63.
ReiseS. P.ScheinesR.WidamanK. F.HavilandM. G. (2013b). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5-26.
64.
RobbinZ. H.TalebR. A.BatayehB.BergenfeldI.EssaidA.SajdiJ.SpencerR. A.ZwooqarA.ClarkC. J. (n.d.). The Influence of Tribal Affiliation in the Sanctioning of Sexual Harassment at a Jordanian University: An Application of French and Raven’s Bases of Social Power.
65.
RodriguezA.ReiseS. P.HavilandM. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223-237.
66.
SAS. (2019). Usage note 61830: Estimating the difference in differences of means. Retrieved April 15, from http://support.sas.com/kb/61/830.html
67.
SciencesNational Academies of Engineering Medicine. (2018). Sexual harassment of women: Climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24994
68.
SpencerR. A.UstaJ.EssaidA.ShukriS.El-GharaibehY.Abu-TalebH.AwwadN.NsourH.SolidaridadAlianza por laFund-LebanonUnited Nations PopulationClarkC. J. (2015). Gender based violence against women and girls displaced by the Syrian conflict in South Lebanon and North Jordan: Scope of violence and health correlates.
69.
StuckyB. D.EdelenM. O. (2014). Using hierarchical IRT models to create unidimensional measures from multidimensional data. In Handbook of item response theory modeling (pp. 201-224). Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
