Gender-based violence is a widespread phenomenon that significantly impacts many women around the world. Among the different forms that it might take, image-based sexual abuse represents one of the most common forms nowadays. According to the literature, sexting—the sharing of sexually explicit messages or images—is one of the most important risk factors for image-based sexual abuse because sexts can be forwarded or published without the authorization of the originator. Nevertheless, sexting can play a role in sexual and relational development and serve as a first step in experimenting with sexual contact in real life. In this study (N = 603 from the general population), we examined the relations between people’s beliefs about sexting, attitudes toward it, and sexting behavior on the one hand, and reactions to a situation of nonconsensual dissemination of sexts on the other hand. Results showed that social pressure exerted by peers and partners to sext was associated with both positive attitudes toward sexting and sexting behaviors. Attitudes toward sexting, then, have a spillover effect on the reactions toward a victim of nonconsensual dissemination of sexts, in terms of empathy, victim blaming, and affective reactions. Implications for both research and policymaking regarding this form of gender-based violence are discussed.
AborisadeR. A. (2022). Image-based sexual abuse in a culturally conservative Nigerian society: Female victims’ narratives of psychosocial costs. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 19(1), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00536-3
2.
BaldryA. C.WinkelF. W. (1998). Perception of the credibility and evidential value of victim an suspect statements in interviews. In BorosJ.MunnichI.SzegediM. (Eds.), Psychology and criminal justice (pp. 74–81). de Gruyter.
3.
BaldryA. C.WinkelF. W. (2008). Intimate partner violence prevention and intervention: The risk assessment and management approach. Nova Science.
4.
BanyardV. L. (2011). Who will help prevent sexual violence: Creating an ecological model of bystander intervention. Psychology of Violence, 1, 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023739
5.
Barrense-DiasY.AkreC.AudersetDi.LeenersB.MorselliD.Sur′ısJ. C. (2020). Non-consensual sexting: Characteristics and motives of youths who share received-intimate content without consent. Sexual Health, 17(3), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH19201
6.
BatesS. (2017). Revenge porn and mental health: A qualitative analysis of the mental health effects of revenge porn on female survivors. Feminist Criminology, 12(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116654565
7.
BaumgartnerS. E.SumterS. R.PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M.LivingstoneS. (2014). Does country context matter? Investigating the predictors of teen sexting across Europe. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.041
BianchiD.MorelliM.ChirumboloA.BaioccoR. (2018). A bad romance. Sexting motivations and teen dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13), 6029–6049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518817037
10.
BothamleyS.TullyR. J. (2018). Understanding revenge pornography: Public perceptions of revenge pornography and victim blaming. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-09-2016-0253
11.
CampbellJ. K.PoageS. M. C.GodleyS.RothmanE. F. (2020). Social anxiety as a consequence of non-consensually disseminated sexually explicit media victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9–10), NP7268–NP7288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520967150
12.
CantoJ. M.PerlesF.MartínJ. S. (2014). The role of right-wing authoritarianism, sexism and culture of honour in rape myths acceptance/El papel del autoritarismo de derechas, del sexismo y de la cultura del honor en la aceptación de los mitos sobre la violación. Revista de Psicología Social, 29(2), 296–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2014.918822
13.
ClancyE. M.KlettkeB.HallfordD. J.CrossmanA. M.MaasM. K.ToumbourouJ. W. (2020). Sharing is not always caring: Understanding motivations and associations with sext dissemination. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106460.
14.
CorcoranE.DotyJ.WisniewskiP.GabrielliJ. (2022). Youth sexting and associations with parental media mediation. Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107263
15.
DakeJ. A.PriceJ. H.MaziarzL.WardB. (2012). Prevalence and correlates of sexting behavior in adolescents. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2012.650959
16.
DeckerM. R.BevilacquaK.WoodS. N.NgareG. W.ThiongoM.ByrneM. E.WilliamsA.DevotoB.GlassN.HeiseL.GichangiP. (2022). Gender-based violence during COVID-19 among adolescent girls and young women in Nairobi, Kenya: A mixed-methods prospective study over 18 months. BMJ Global Health, 7(2), e007807. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007807
17.
EatonA. A.McGlynnC. (2020). The psychology of nonconsensual porn: Understanding and addressing a growing form of sexual violence. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220941534
GavinJ.ScottA. J. (2019). Attributions of victim responsibility in revenge pornography. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 11(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-03-2019-0408
21.
HaegerichT. M.BottomsB. L. (2000). Empathy and jurors’ decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations. Law and Human Behavior, 24(4), 421–448. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005592213294
22.
HealeyJ. (Ed.) (2014). Domestic and family violence. The Spinney Press.
23.
HenryN.McGlynnC.FlynnA.JohnsonK.PowellA.ScottA. J. (2021). Image-based sexual abuse: A study on the causes and consequences of nonconsensual nude and sexual imagery. Routledge.
24.
HuL.-T.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
25.
HudsonH. K.FetroJ. V.OgletreeR. (2014). Behavioral indicators and behaviors related to sexting among undergraduate students. American Journal of Health Education, 45(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2014.901113
26.
KeithT. Z. (2015). Multiple regression and beyond: An introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Routledge.
McGlynnC.JohnsonK.RackleyE.HenryN. M.PowellA.GaveyN.FlynnA. (2021). “It’s torture for the soul”: The harms of image-based sexual abuse. Social and Legal Studies, 30(4), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663920947791
29.
MorelliM.BianchiD.BaioccoR.PezzutiL.ChirumboloA. (2016). Sexting, psychological distress and dating violence among adolescents and young adults. Psicothema, 28(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2015.193
30.
MoriC.TempleJ. R.BrowneD.MadiganS. (2019). Association of sexting with sexual behaviors and mental health among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(8), 770–779. http://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1658
31.
MorrisM. A. (2017). Empathy Induction to Reduce Victim Blaming in Revenge Porn Cases. UND: University of North Dakota Press. https://commons.und.edu/theses/685
32.
OjedaM.Del ReyR.HunterS. C. (2019). Longitudinal relationships between sexting and involvement in both bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Adolescence, 77, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.10.003
33.
PagliaroS.CavazzaN.PaoliniD.TeresiM.JohnsonJ. D.PacilliM. G. (2022). Adding insult to injury: The effects of intimate partner violence spillover on the victim’s reputation. Violence Against Women, 28(6–7), 1523–1541. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012211014566.
34.
PagliaroS.PacilliM. G.BaldryA. C. (2020). Bystanders’ reactions to intimate partner violence: An experimental approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 149–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1776031
35.
PowellA.HenryN.FlynnA.ScottA. J. (2019). Image-based sexual abuse: The extent, nature, and predictors of perpetration in a community sample of Australian residents. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.009
36.
PowellA.WebsterK. (2018). Cultures of gendered violence: An integrative review of measures of attitudinal support for violence against women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865816675669
37.
PowellA.ScottA. J.FlynnA.McCookS. (2022). Perpetration of image-based sexual abuse: Extent, nature and correlates in a multi-country sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24), NP22864–NP22889. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211072266
38.
RobertsS.RavnS. (2020). Towards a sociological understanding of sexting as a social practice: A case study of university undergraduate men. Sociology, 54(2), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519864239
39.
RolleroC.De PiccoliN. (2020). Myths about intimate partner violence and moral disengagement: An analysis of sociocultural dimensions sustaining violence against women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218139
40.
RolleroC.PagliaroS. (2022). Moral foundations and victim blaming in case of non-consensual dissemination of one’s sexual images: A preliminary study. Psicologia Sociale (Social Psychology Theory & Research), 17(2), 195–205.
41.
RolleroC.BergagnaE.TartagliaS. (2021). What is violence? The role of sexism and social dominance orientation in recognizing violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(21–22), NP11349–NP11366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519888525
42.
SaucierD. A.StrainM. L.HockettJ. M.McManusJ. L. (2015). Stereotypic beliefs about masculine honor are associated with perceptions of rape and women who have been raped. Social Psychology, 46, 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000240
43.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. L. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
44.
TempleJ. R.StrasburgerV. C.ZimmermanH.MadiganS. (2019). Sexting in youth: Cause for concern?The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 3(8), 520–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30199-3
45.
Van OuytselJ.LuY.ShinY.AvalosB. L.PettigrewJ. (2021). Sexting, pressured sexting and associations with dating violence among early adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106969
46.
Van OuytselJ.PonnetK.WalraveM. (2017). The associations of adolescents’ dating violence victimization, well-being and engagement in risk behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 55, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.005
47.
Van OuytselJ.PonnetK.WalraveM. (2018). Cyber dating abuse victimization among secondary school students from a lifestyle-routine activities theory perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(17), 2767–2776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516629390
48.
WalkerS.SanciL.Temple-SmithM. (2013). Sexting: Young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(6), 697–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.026
49.
WalraveM.HeirmanW.HallamL. (2014). Under pressure to sext? Applying the theory of planned behaviour to adolescent sexting. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.837099
50.
WalraveM.OuytselJ. V.PonnetK.TempleJ. R. (Eds.) (2018). Sharing and caring? The role of social media and privacy in sexting behaviour. In Sexting (pp. 1–17). Palgrave Macmillan.
51.
WalraveM.PonnetK.Van OuytselJ.Van GoolE.HeirmanW.VerbeekA. (2015). Whether or not to engage in sexting: Explaining adolescent sexting behaviour by applying the prototype willingness model. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 796–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.03.008
52.
WaltermaurerE. (2012). Public justification of intimate partner violence: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012447699
WillieT. C.KershawT. S. (2019). An ecological analysis of gender inequality and intimate partner violence in the United States. Preventive Medicine, 118, 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.019
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
