There is a clear need for developing a comprehensive, unbiased, and psychometrically sound tool to assess child maltreatment. The aim of this study is to examine the structural validity, internal consistency, and convergent validity of a newly developed child maltreatment assessment instrument. A total of 286 professionals of the child protection system participated in the study, completing a total of 645 cases of children and adolescents. The Adolescents and Children Risk of Abuse and Maltreatment Parental Scale (ACRAM-PS), the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire Short Form (CTQ-SF) and other demographic variables were measured. Structural validity, internal consistency, and convergent validity of the ACRAM-PS were tested. This scale obtained good structural validity, internal consistency, and convergent validity as hypothesized patterns of correlations occurred as expected. This instrument implies a considerable improvement as it is comprehensive, psychometrically sound and, it has been articulated by its own users. It can significantly contribute to establish a common language among professionals, improve multidisciplinary communication, and optimize prevention, detection, and early intervention in child maltreatment.
BartelinkC.Van YperenT. A.IngridJ. (2015). Deciding on child maltreatment: A literature review on methods that improve decision-making. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.07.002
2.
BentovimA.ChorpitaB. F.DaleidenE. L.GrayJ.PizzeyS.VizardE. (2021). The value of a modular, multi-focal, therapeutic approach to addressing child maltreatment: Hope for children and families intervention resources—A discussion article. Child Abuse & Neglect, 119, 104703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104703
3.
BernsteinD. P.SteinJ. A.NewcombM. D.WalkerE.PoggeD.AhluvaliaT.StokesJ.HandelsmanL.MedranoM.DesmondDZuleW. (2003). Development and validation of a brief screening version of the childhood trauma questionnaire. Child Maltreatment & Neglect, 27(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00541-0
4.
BrumleyL. D.BrumleyB. P.JaffeeS. R. (2019). Comparing cumulative index and factor analytic approaches to measuring maltreatment in the national longitudinal study of adolescent to adult health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 87, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.08.014
5.
CalheirosM. M.MonteiroM. B.PatrícioJ. N.CarmonaM. (2016). Defining child maltreatment among lay people and community professionals: Exploring consensus in ratings of severity. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(7), 2292–2305.
6.
CalheirosM. M.SilvaC. S.MagalhãesE. (2021). Child Maltreatment Severity Questionnaire (MSQ) for professionals: Development, validity, and reliability evidence. Assessment, 28(5), 1397–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0385-x
7.
CowleyL. E.MaguireS.FarewellD. M.Quinn-ScogginsH. D.FlynnM. O.KempA. M. (2018). Factors influencing child protection professionals’ decision-making and multidisciplinary collaboration in suspected abusive head trauma cases: A qualitative study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 82, 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.06.009
8.
CrescenzaG.FiorucciM.RossielloM. C.StilloL. (2021). Education and the pandemic: Distance learning and the school-family relationship. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives, 26, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.26.18078
9.
EvansR.GarnerP.HonigA. S. (2014). Prevention of violence, maltreatment and neglect in early childhood: A review of the literature on research, policy and practice. Early Child Development and Care, 184(9–10), 1295–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.910327
10.
FallonB.TrocméN.FlukeJ.MacLaurinB.TonmyrL.YuanY. Y. (2010). Methodological challenges in measuring child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.08.008
11.
FengJ.-Y.ChenY.-W.FetzerS.FengM.-C.LinC.-L. (2012). Ethical and legal challenges of mandated child abuse reporters. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 276–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.026
12.
FinneyS. J.Di StefanoC. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in SEM. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modelling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Information Age Publishing.
13.
ForsnerM.ElvhageG.Ewalds-KvistB. M.LützénK. (2021). Moral challenges when suspecting abuse and neglect in school children: A mixed method study. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 38, 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00680-6
14.
GabrielliJ.JacksonY. (2019). Innovative methodological and statistical approaches to the study of child maltreatment: Introduction. Child Abuse & Neglect, 87, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.001
15.
GabrielliJ.JacksonY.TunnoA. M.HambrickE. P. (2017). The blind men and the elephant: Identification of a latent maltreatment construct for youth in foster care. Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.020
16.
Garcia-CastillaF. J.De JuanasA.Díaz-EsterriD.GoigR. M. (2022). Relaciones socioafectivas para la inclusión de los jóvenes egresados del sistema de protección: percepción de los educadores. Dykinson.
17.
GeorgievaS.TomasJ. M.Navarro-PérezJ. J. (2021). Systematic review and critical appraisal of childhood trauma questionnaire-short form (CTQ-SF). Child Abuse & Neglect, 120, 105223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105223
18.
GuastaferroK.LutzkerJ. R. (2021). The prevention of child maltreatment: Using SafeCare® to highlight successes and needs for improvement in prevention efforts. International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-021-00090-w
19.
HornoP. (2006). Atención a los niños y las niñas víctimas de la violencia de género. Psychosocial Intervention, 15(3), 307–316.
20.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
21.
IBM Corp. (2020). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 27.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp.
22.
JackS. M.GonzalezA.MarcellusL.TonmyrL.VarcoeC.Van BorekN.SheehanD.MacKinnonK.CampbellK.CatherineN.LandyC. K.MacMillanH. L.WaddellC. (2021). Public health nurses’ professional practices to prevent, recognize, and respond to suspected child maltreatment in home visiting: An interpretive descriptive study. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 8, 2333393621993450. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393621993450
23.
JacksonY.McGuireA.TunnoA. M.MakanuiP. K. (2019). A reasonably large review of operationalization in child maltreatment research: Assessment approaches and sources of information in youth samples. Child Abuse & Neglect, 87, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.09.016
24.
KiselyS.AbajobirA. A.MillsR.StrathearnL.ClavarinoA.NajmanJ. M. (2018). Child maltreatment and mental health problems in adulthood: Birth cohort study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 213(6), 698–703. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2018.207
25.
KorbinJ.GellesR. J.LancesterJ. B. (2017). Child maltreatment in cross cultural perspective: Vulnerable children and circumstances. In GellesR. J.LancesterJ. B. (Eds.), Child abuse and neglect: Biosocial dimensions-foundations of human behavior. Transaction
26.
KuglerK. C.GuastaferroK.ShenkC. E.BealS. J.ZadzoraK. M.NollJ. G. (2019). The effect of substantiated and unsubstantiated investigations of child maltreatment and subsequent adolescent health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 87, 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.06.005
27.
ManfulE.AbdullahA. (2021). Conceptualisation of child neglect: A Ghanaian practice narrative. International Social Work, 64(3), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872818810382
28.
Martín-CabreraE.Suárez-MartínH. (2018). La investigación en desprotección infantil. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 31(1), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.5209/CUTS.52753
29.
McKayM. T.CannonM.ChambersD.ConroyR. M.CoughlanH.DoddP.HealyC.O'DonnellL.ClarkeM. C. (2021) Childhood trauma and adult mental disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 143(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13268
MerrildC. H.FrostL. (2021). Identifying signs of child neglect and abuse in general practice. Danish Medical Journal, 68(2), A05200396.
32.
MokkinkL. B.De VetH. C.PrinsenC. A.PatrickD. L.AlonsoJ.BouterL. M.TerweeC. B. (2018). COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1171–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
Navarro-PérezJ. J.SamperP.SanchoP.GeorgievaS.CarbonellÁ.MestreM. V. (2023). Development and content validation of a comprehensive tool for assessing risk and protective factors in children and adolescents: The ACRAM. Children and Youth Services Review, 145, 106761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106761
35.
NormanR. E.ByambaaM.DeR.ButchartA.ScottJ.VosT. (2012). The long-term health consequences of child physical maltreatment, emotional maltreatment, and neglect: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 9(11), e1001349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349
36.
PaulhusD. L.VazireS. (2007). The self-report method. In RobinsRichard W.FraleyR. ChrisKruegerRobert F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). The Guilford Press.
37.
PearsK. C.KimH. K.FisherP. A. (2008). Psychosocial and cognitive functioning of children with specific profiles of maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 958–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.12.009
38.
PetrowskiN.CappaC.PereiraA.MasonH.DabanR. A. (2021). Violence against children during COVID-19: Assessing and understanding change in use of helplines. Child Abuse & Neglect, 116, 104757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104757
39.
Picornell-LucasA.López-PeláezA. (2022). The digital citizenship of children and adolescents: Challenges for social work education. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives, 28, 32–37. https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.28.23001
40.
PrinsenC. A.MokkinkL. B.BouterL. M.AlonsoJ.PatrickD. L.De VetH. C.TerweeC. B. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
41.
RunyanD. K.EnglishD. J. (2006). Measuring child abuse and neglect using child protective services records. In FeerickM. M.KnutsonJ. F.TrickettP. K.FlanzerS. M. (Eds.), Child abuse and neglect: Definitions, classifications, and a framework for research (pp. 255–292). Paul H Brookes.
42.
SainiS. M.HoffmannC. R.PantelisC.EverallI. P.BousmanC. A. (2019). Systematic review and critical appraisal of child maltreatment measurement instruments. Psychiatry Research, 272, 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.068
43.
SchmidtM. R.NarayanA. J.AtzlV. M.RiveraL. M.LiebermanA. F. (2020). Childhood maltreatment on the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) scale versus the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) in a perinatal sample. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 29(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2018.1524806
44.
SlackK. S.HollJ. L.LeeB. J.McDanielM.AltenberndL.StevensA. B. (2003). Child protective intervention in the context of welfare reform: The effects of work and welfare on maltreatment reports. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22, 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.10152
45.
Sprague-JonesJ.SinghP.RousseauM.CountsJ.FirmanC. (2020). The protective factors survey, 2nd edition: Establishing validity and reliability of a self-report measure of protective factors against child maltreatment. Child & Youth Services Review, 111, 104868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104868
46.
SteenJ. A.DuranL. (2014). Entryway into the child protection system: The impacts of child maltreatment reporting policies and reporting system structures. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(5), 868–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.11.009
47.
TerweeC. B.PrinsenC. A.ChiarottoA.WestermanM. J.PatrickD. L.AlonsoJ.BouterL. M.de VetH. C. W.MokkinkL. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1159–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
48.
TorosK.TiirikR. (2016). Preschool teachers’ perceptions about and experience with child abuse and neglect. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-014-0675-0
49.
TuffordL.LeeB.BogoM.WenghoferE.EtheringtonC.ThieuV.ZhaoR. (2021). Decision-making and relationship competence when reporting suspected physical abuse and child neglect: An objective structured clinical evaluation. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49(2), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-020-00785-6
50.
UNICEF. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund.
51.
VachonD. D.KruegerR. F.RogoschF. A.CicchettiD. (2015). Assessment of the harmful psychiatric and behavioral effects of different forms of child maltreatment. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(11), 1135–1142. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1792
52.
van der PutC. E.AssinkM.van SolingeN. F. B. (2017). Predicting child maltreatment: A meta-analysis of the predictive validity of risk assessment instruments. Child Abuse & Neglect, 73, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.016
53.
VerdeC.PicornellA.Navarro-PerezJ. J. (2019). La protección pública a la infancia desde el trabajo social: factores de riesgo y desamparo, in Respuestas del trabajo social ante emergencias sociales y problemáticas sociales complejas de México y España. Dykinson.
54.
WiklundS. (2006). Signs of child maltreatment. The extent and nature of referrals to Swedish child welfare agencies. European Journal of Social Work, 9(1), 39–58.
ZeijlmansK.LópezM.GrietensH.KnorthE. J. (2017). Matching children with foster carers: A literature review. Children and Youth Services Review, 73, 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.12.017
57.
ZhangH.HanT.MaS.QuG.ZhaoT.DingX.SunL.QinQ.ChenM.SunY. (2022). Association of child maltreatment and bullying victimization among Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of family function, resilience, and anxiety. Journal of Affective Disorders, 299, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.1
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
