For graduate students, wearing two hats is a part of the graduate education experience by being responsible for overseeing undergraduate students in research/teaching roles as employees and being students themselves, mentored by faculty members. These multifaceted roles taken on by graduate students have received relatively minimal research regarding sex-based discrimination and sexual violence incidents, which are reportable under Title IX. Our research questions encompassed what barriers graduate students faced in reporting to Title IX, as well as graduate students’ experiences reporting Title IX incidents and their suggestions for improvement to the process. Our study addresses these gaps via semi-structured focus groups and individual interviews with 22 graduate students at one University. Our results revealed that graduate students faced sexual violence along with sex-based harassment and discrimination perpetrated by peers and faculty. While some incidents were unreported due to a lack of clarity and transparency in policies, those who reported often had unsatisfactory experiences regardless of the entity they reported to, including the Title IX office. This project has implications for developing educational campaigns and improving resource supports for graduate students navigating institutional processes pertaining to sexual violence as both an employee and a student.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.PlanteE. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463–481.
2.
BloomB. E.SorinC. R.OaksL.WagmanJ. A. (2023). Graduate students are “making a big fuss”: Responding to institutional betrayal around campus sexual violence and sexual harassment. Journal of School Violence, 22(1), 44–60.
3.
Bonistall PostelE. J. (2020). Violence against international students: A critical gap in the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(1), 71–82.
4.
BoyleK. M.McKinzieA. E. (2021). The prevalence and psychological cost of interpersonal violence in graduate and law school. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13–14), 6319–6350.
5.
CantalupoN. C.KidderW. C. (2017). Mapping the Title IX iceberg: Sexual harassment (mostly) in graduate school by college faculty. Journal of Legal Education, 66(4), 850–881.
6.
CantorD.FisherB.ChibnallS.TownsendR.LeeH.BruceC.ThomasG. (2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. American Association of Universities.
7.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
8.
CiprianoA. E.HollandK. J.BederaN.EaganS. R.DiedeA. S. (2022). Severe and pervasive? Consequences of sexual harassment for graduate students and their Title IX report outcomes. Feminist Criminology, 17(3), 343–367.
9.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Strategies for qualitative data analysis. In CorbinJ.StraussA. (Eds.), Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed., pp. 65–86). Sage.
10.
CusanoJ.KirknerA.JohnsonL.McMahonS. (2021). Sexual violence prevalence and disclosure patterns among college undergraduates: Exploring types of sexual violence and incident-specific characteristics. Journal of American College Health, 71(3), 725–735.
11.
DeLovehH. L.CattaneoL. B. (2017). Deciding where to turn: A qualitative investigation of college students’ helpseeking decisions after sexual assault. American Journal of Community Psychology, 59(1–2), 65–79.
12.
DeMatteoD.GallowayM.ArnoldS.PatelU. (2015). Sexual assault on college campuses: A 50-state survey of criminal sexual assault statutes and their relevance to campus sexual assault. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(3), 227.
13.
GallagherR. P. (2011). National survey of counseling center directors 2011. American College Counseling Association.
14.
Hayes-SmithR. M.LevettL. M. (2010). Student perceptions of sexual assault resources and prevalence of rape myth attitudes. Feminist Criminology, 5(4), 335–354.
15.
HyunJ. K.QuinnB. C.MadonT.LustigS. (2006). Graduate student mental health: Needs assessment and utilization of counseling services. Journal of College Student Development, 47(3), 247–266.
16.
JohnsonN. L.GutekunstM. H.RocchinoG. H.SiepserC. F.LippN. S.DeSipioB. E. (2023). “There are good and bad elements to it for sure”: Students’ and faculty/staff’s perceptions of the Title IX mandated reporting policy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(19–20), 10771–10794.
17.
KaramiA.WhiteC. N.FordK.SwanS.SpinelM. Y. (2020). Unwanted advances in higher education: Uncovering sexual harassment experiences in academia with text mining. Information Processing & Management, 57(2), 102167.
18.
LorenzK.HayesR.JacobsenC. (2022). “Keeping the wound open”: Survivor experiences with Title IX investigations. Women & Criminal Justice, 34(4), 270–290.
19.
LorenzK.KirknerA.MazarL. (2019). Graduate student experiences with sexual harassment and academic and social (dis)engagement in higher education. Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education, 12(2), 205–219.
McDanielB. (2021, April5). Title IX reforms: Including graduate students in the conversation. National Women’s Law Center.
22.
McMahonS.O’ConnorJ.SeabrookR. (2018). Not just an undergraduate issue: Campus climate and sexual violence among graduate students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(7–8), NP4296–NP4314.
23.
O’CallaghanE.SheppV.KirknerA.LorenzK. (2022). Sexual harassment in the academy: Harnessing the growing labor movement in higher education to address sexual harassment against graduate workers. Violence Against Women, 28(12–13), 3266–3288.
24.
OswaltS. B.RiddockC. C. (2007). What to do about being overwhelmed: Graduate students, stress and university services. College Student Affairs Journal, 27(1), 24–44.
25.
PoyerA. (2020). Separate and unequal: The genesis of a gender-biased campus disciplinary system for sexual violence survivors in California. California Western Law Review, 57(1), 351.
26.
RosenthalM. N.SmidtA. M.FreydJ. J. (2016). Still second class: Sexual harassment of graduate students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 364–377.
27.
SmithL.SwartzP.Irvin-EricksonY. (2024a). “Information is power:” Promoting a safer environment for college students to report sexual violence. Journal of School Violence, 23(1), 30–42.
28.
SmithL.SwartzP.Irvin-EricksonY. (2024b). Navigating the grey area: International college students’ knowledge and perceptions of Title IX. Journal of International Students, 14(4), 606–623.
29.
StroutT.AmarA. F.AstwoodK. (2014). Women’s center staff perceptions of the campus climate on sexual violence. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 10(3), 135–143.
30.
SuttonT. E.CulattaE.BoyleK. M.TurnerJ. L. (2021). Individual vulnerability and organizational context as risks for sexual harassment among female graduate students. Social Currents, 8(3), 229–248.
31.
UllmanS. E. (2024). Perspectives on future research on sexual assault disclosure and social support. Psychology of Violence, 14(6), 441–448.
32.
US Department of Education. (2024). Nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance. Final Rule, 89(83), F.R. 33474.
33.
WebermannA. R.HollandK. J.MurphyC. M. (2023). Student experiences reporting sexual and gender-based misconduct to the Title IX office at a public state university. Violence Against Women, 30(6–7), 1564–1585.
