This study investigates how performance on a spatial task in apparel design was influenced by use of strategy. The sample consisted of 278 undergraduate apparel design students from six universities in the United States. Instruments used to collect data were the Apparel Spatial Visualization Test (ASVT) and Use of Strategy Questionnaire. Use of strategy influenced performance on the ASVT. Some strategies were superior to others by the fact that they led to a higher percentage of correct responses on the ASVT, for example, landmark extraction, checking, and previous knowledge. Because use of strategies influenced performance on a spatial task, further research could investigate methods of training students in the choice of appropriate strategies.
Baron, J. (1978). Intelligence and general strategies. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies in information processing (pp. 403-450). London: Academic Press.
2.
Ben-Chaim, D., Lappan, G., & Houang, R. (1988). The effect of instruction on spatial visualization skills of middle school boys and girls. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 51-71.
Childers, T.L., Houston, M.J., & Heckler, S.E. (1985). Measurement of individual differences in visual versus verbal information processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 125-134.
5.
Cooper, L.A., & Mumaw, R.J. (1985). Spatial aptitude. In R. Dillon (Ed.), Individual differences in cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 67-94). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
6.
Forrest, E.B. (2001). Visual imagery as an information processing strategy [Electronic version]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(10), 584-586.
7.
Gages, T.T. (1994). The interrelationship among spatial ability, strategy used, and learning style for visualization problems. Dissertation Abstracts International, 55(11), 3399A.
8.
Gitimu, P.N., & Workman, J.E. (in press). Identification of strategies used for solving items on the Apparel Spatial Visualization Test. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal.
9.
Gluck, J., & Fitting, S. (2003). Spatial strategy selection: Interesting incremental information. International Journal of Testing, 3(3), 293-308.
10.
Gorgorió, N. (1998). Exploring the functionality of visual and non-visual strategies in solving rotational problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35(3), 207-231.
11.
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability . Psychological Review, 92, 137-171.
12.
Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R.K. (2002). Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition & Instruction , 20(1), 47-78.
13.
Kyllonen, P.C., Lohman, D.F., & Snow, R.E. (1984). Effects of aptitude, strategy training, and task facets on spatial task performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 130-145.
14.
Kyllonen, P.C., Lohman, D.F., & Woltz, D.J. (1984). Componential modeling of alternative strategies for performing spatial tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology , 76, 1325-1345.
15.
Lajoie, S.P. (2003). Individual differences in spatial ability: Developing technologies to increase strategy awareness and skills. Educational Psychologist, 38(2), 115-126.
16.
Lemaire, P., & Reder, L. (1999). What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects of product verification. Memory and Cognition, 27, 364-382.
17.
Lohman, D.F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge . In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 181-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Lohman, D.F., & Kyllonen, P. (1983). Individual differences in solution strategy on spatial tasks. In R. F. Dillon & R. R. Schmeck (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition (pp. 105-135). New York: Academic Press.
19.
McGee, M. (1979). Human spatial abilitiesNew York: Praeger.
20.
Miller, C.L., & Bertoline, G.R. (1991). Spatial visualization research and theories: Their importance in the development of an engineering and technical design graphics curriculum model. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 55(3), 5-14.
21.
Orzada, B., & Kallal, M.J. (2001). Relationship of spatial visualization skills to style of processing preferences. In R. E. Griffin, V. S. Williams, & J. Lee (Eds.), Exploring the visual future: Art, design, science, & technology: Selected readings of the International Visual Literacy Association (pp. 363-367). Ames, IA: International Visual Literacy Association.
22.
Pennings, A. (1988). The development of strategies in embedded figure tasks. International Journal of Psychology, 23(1), 65-79.
23.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1997). The child's conception of space. New York: Routledge.
24.
Saczynski, J.S., Willis, S.L., & Schaie, K.W. (2002). Strategy use in reasoning training with older adults. Aging Neuropsychology andCognition, 9(1), 48-60.
25.
Schultz, K. (1991). The contribution of solution strategy to spatial performance. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 474-491.
26.
Strong, S., & Smith, R. (2002). Spatial visualization: Fundamentals and trends in engineering graphics [Electronic version]. Journal of Industrial Technology, 18(1), 1-5.
27.
Workman, J.E., Caldwell, L., & Kallal, M.J. (1999). Development of a test to measure spatial abilities associated with apparel design and product development. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(3), 128-133.
28.
Workman, J.E., & Lee, S. (2004). A cross-cultural comparison of the apparel spatial visualization test and paper folding test. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 22(1/2), 22-30.
29.
Workman, J.E., & Zhang, L. (1999). Relationship of general and apparel spatial visualization ability. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(4), 169-175.
