The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of culture and training on preferred perceptual learning style and performance of spatial tasks in apparel design. Participants were 88 U.S. and 97 Swazi university students enrolled in apparel design courses. To measure performance on spatial tasks, the Apparel Spatial Visualization Test (ASVT) was used. Preferred perceptual learning styles were measured by the Perceptual Modality Preference Survey. Spatial task performance was affected by training and culture of participants. U.S. students (compared with Swazi students) and students in upper-level apparel design courses (compared with lower-level) scored higher on the ASVT. Preferred perceptual learning style was affected by culture but not by training. Swazi students had a greater preference for the Print modality than U.S. students who indicated a greater preference for the Haptic and Visual modalities.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Razavieh, A. (1990). Introduction to research in education (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
2.
Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327-344.
3.
Barbe, W., & Milone, M. (1981, February). What we know about modality strengths . Educational Leadership, 378-380.
4.
Booth, M.G. (1997, November). Western schooling and traditional society in Swaziland. Comparative Education, 33(3), 433-451.
5.
Caldwell, L.F., Workman, J.E., Lee, S-H., & Khoza, L.S. (2005). A cross-cultural analysis of learning styles among fashion design and merchandising students. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 23(4), 350-359.
6.
Cherry, C.E. (1981). The measurement of adult learning styles: Perceptual modality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
7.
Devlin, A.S. (2001). Mind and maze: Spatial cognition and environmental behavior. Westport, CT: Praeger .
8.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Treffinger, D.J. (1992). Bringing out the gifted and talented adolescents: An international learning style perspective. Westport, CT: Praeger.
10.
Emch, E.R. (1990). Kolb's learning style preference and academic achievement of selected home economics undergraduates. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(3), 823A.
11.
Finke, R.A. (1989). Principles of mental imagery. London: The MIT Press.
12.
Gitimu, P., & Workman, J. (2006, November 1-4). Influence of strategy choice on spatial performance in apparel design. Oral research presentation at 2006 International Textile and Apparel Association annual conference, San Antonio, TX.
13.
Guild, P. (1994). The culture/learning style connection. Educational Leadership, 51(8), 16-21.
14.
Hansen, J. (1995). Student cognitive styles in postsecondary technology programs. Journal of Technology Education, 6(2), 19-33.
15.
Honigsfeld, A.M. (2001). A comparative analysis of the learning styles of adolescents from diverse nations by age, gender, academic achievement level, and nationality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, St. John's University, New York. Digital Dissertations, AAT 3010284.
16.
Honigsfeld, A.M., & Dunn, R. (2003). High school male and female learning style similarities and differences in diverse nations. Journal of Educational Research, 96(4), 195-206.
17.
Humphreys, L., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 250-261.
18.
Khoza, L.S. (2003). The effects of culture and training on learning styles and performance of spatial tasks of U.S. and Swazi university students enrolled in apparel design courses. Unpublished dissertation, Southern Illinois University.
19.
Kim, I., & Uh, M. (2002). Apparel making in fashion design. New York: Fairchild.
20.
Kosslyn, S. (1981). The medium and the message in mental imagery: A theory. Psychological Review, 88(1), 44-66.
21.
Liben, L. (1981). Spatial representation and behavior: Multiple perspectives. In L. Liben, A. Patterson, & N. Newcomb (Eds.), Spatial representation and behavior across the life span (pp. 3-36). New York: Academic Press.
22.
Lohman, D., Pellegrino, J., Alderton, D., & Regian, J. (1987). Dimensions and components of individual differences in spatial abilities. In S. Irvine & S. Newstead (Eds.), Intelligence and cognition: Contemporary frames of reference (pp. 253-312). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
23.
Lounsbury, J., & Gibson, L. (1987, February). Standardizing marker maker selection: Levi's approach. Bobbin, pp. 68, 70, 72-73.
24.
Magaya, L. (2000). The relationships among perceived stress, perceived social support, socioeconomic status, and the coping strategies of Zimbabwean adolescents. Unpublished master's thesis, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
25.
McCracken, G. (1988). Culture and consumption. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
26.
McGee, M. (1979). Human spatial abilities. New York: Praeger.
27.
Miller, C.L., & Bertoline, G.R. (1991). Spatial visualization research and theories: Their importance in the development of an engineering and technical design graphics curriculum model. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 55(3), 5-14.
28.
Orzada, B.T., & Kallal, M.J. (2001). Relationship of spatial visualization skills to style of processing preferences. In R. E. Griffin, V. S. Williams, & J. Lee (Eds.), Exploring the visual future: Art, design, science, & technology: Selected readings of the international visual literacy association (pp. 363-367). Available from International Visual Literacy Association Web site: http://www.jvla.org
29.
Pandey, J. (1990). The environment, culture, and behavior. In R. W. Brislin (Ed), Applied cross-cultural psychology (vol. 14, pp. 254-277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Pike, G. (2001). Assessment measures. Assessment Update, 13(4), 14-15.
31.
Schaiper, L.L. (1983). Identification of perceptual learning style differences and the impact thereof upon individual university students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
32.
Shaughnessy, M.F. (1998). An interview with Rita Dunn about learning styles . The Clearing House, 71(3), 141-145.
33.
Shepard, R.N., & Feng, C. (1972). A chronometric study of mental paper folding. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 228-243.
34.
Williams, Y. (2001). A comparison of the perceptual learning style modalities of African-American, Hispanic-American, and European-American adult females as measured by the Multi-Modal Paired Associates Learning Test III . Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(4), 1258A.
35.
Workman, J.E. (2000, November 8-11). Perceptual modality preferences of clothing and textiles students. Paper presented at the 2000 meeting of International Textile and Apparel Association. Abstract available from http://www.itaaonline.org/index2.html
36.
Workman, J.E., & Caldwell, L.F. (2007). Effects of training in apparel design and product development on spatial visualization skills. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 25(1), 42-57.
37.
Workman, J.E., Caldwell, L.F., & Kallal, M.J. (1999). Development of a test to measure spatial abilities associated with apparel design and product development. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(3), 128-133.
38.
Workman, J.E., & Lee, S-H. (2004). A cross-cultural comparison of the apparel spatial visualization test and paper folding test. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 22(1/2), 22-30.
39.
Workman, J.E., & Zhang, L. (1999). Relationship of general and apparel spatial visualization ability. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(4), 169-175.
