Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2010-01
Exploring Gen Y Responses to an Apparel Brand’s Use of Cause-Related Marketing Does Message Matter When It Comes to Support for the Breast Cancer Cause?
This study explored Gen Y’s responses to cause-related marketing (CRM) in apparel advertising. Data were collected from 349 Gen Y consumers to examine the influence of CRM on attitudes and purchase intentions toward an apparel brand. Attitude toward the brand was predicted by awareness of the apparel brand, perception of CRM, evaluation of the advertisement, involvement in the breast cancer cause, and gender. The theory of reasoned action was used to predict Gen Y’s purchase intentions and the utility of the classic model was compared to that of an extended model that included variables external to the theory. In the classic model, purchase intention was predicted by attitude toward the brand and subjective norm. In the extended model, purchase intention was predicted by attitude toward the brand, subjective norm, awareness of the apparel brand, evaluation of the advertisement, and involvement in the breast cancer cause. A calculated F-ratio indicated that the extended model provided additional explanatory power.
Ajzen, I. ( 1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior . In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
2.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. ( 1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Alexander, M.W., & Judd, B., Jr. (1978). Do nudes in ads enhance brand recall ? Journal of Advertising Research, 18, 47-50.
4.
Alloy Media & Marketing. (2006, July 5). A very convenient truth: College students ‘tuned in’ to social responsibility and the brands who they believe are making a difference . Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters/clientnews/2006_Alloy.pdf
5.
Alloy Media & Marketing. (2007, September 6). College students putting their money where their cause is. Retrieved December 11, 2007, from http://www.alloymarketing.com/investor_relations/new_releases/doc/070906_alloy_2.doc
6.
Andersson, S., Hedelin, A., Nilsson, A., & Welander, C. ( 2004). Violent advertising in fashion marketing. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 8, 96-112.
7.
Bailey, D., & Hall, S. ( 1992). The vertigo of displacement. Ten.8, 2, 14-23.
8.
Barone, M.J., Norman, A.T., & Miyazaki, A.D. (2007). Consumer response to retailer use of CRM: Is more fit better? Journal of Retailing, 83, 437-445.
9.
Berglind, M., & Nakata, C. ( 2005). CRM: More buck than bang? Business Horizons , 48, 443-453.
10.
Broderick, A., Jogi, A., & Garry, T. ( 2003). Tickled pink: The personal meaning of cause related marketing for customers. Journal of Marketing Management, 19, 583-610.
11.
Brunel, F.F., & Nelson, M.R. ( 2000). Explaining gendered responses to ‘‘help-self ’’ and ‘‘help-others’’ charity ad appeals: The mediating role of world views. Journal of Advertising , 29, 15-28.
12.
Burns, D.J., Reid, J., Toncar, M., Anderson, C., & Wells, C. ( 2008). The effect of gender on the motivation of members of Generation Y college students to volunteer. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 19, 99-118.
13.
Cone Inc. (2006). The millennial generation: Pro-social and empowered to change the world-The 2006 cone millennial cause study. Retrieved December 12, 2007, from http://www.solsustainability.org/documents/toolkit/2006%20Cone%20Millennial%20Cause%20Study.pdf
14.
Cone Inc. (2007). 2007 cone cause evolution & environmental survey. Research report. Retrieved July 14, 2008, from http://www.coneinc.com/files/2007ConeSurveyReport.pdf
15.
Crane, L. ( 2007). On campus and beyond: College students today. Harris Interactive-Trends & Tudes, 6, 1-4.
16.
Cui, Y., Trent, E.S., Sullivan, P.M., & Matiru, G.N. ( 2003). CRM: How generation Y responds. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31, 310-320.
17.
De Pelsmacker, P., & Van Den Bergh, J. (1996). The communication effects of provocation in print advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 15, 203-221.
18.
Feitelberg, R., & Monget, K. ( 2003, October 31). Banding together for the cause. Women’s Wear Daily, 186, 14-15.
19.
Fishbein, M., & &Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20.
Garcia, T. ( 2007, October 22). The spirit of generosity. PRWeek cause survey 2007. PRWeek. Retrieved April 21, 2008, from http://www.barkleyus.com/pdf/cause_survey.pdf
21.
Grau, S.L., & Folse, J.A.G. ( 2007). The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising , 36, 19-33.
22.
Grazer, W.F., & Keesling, G. ( 1995). The effect of print advertising’s use of sexual themes on brand recall and purchase intention: A product specific investigation of males’ responses. Journal of Applied Business Research , 11, 47-57.
23.
Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. ( 2006). The company-cause-customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23, 314-326.
24.
Hoey, T. ( 2008, March 16). How to turn generation Y into generation $ . The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved December 5, 2008, from http://www.smh.com.au/news/money/how-to-turn-generation-y-into-generation-/2008/03/15/1205472147099.html
25.
Holmes, J.H., & Crocker, K.E. ( 1987). Predispositions and the comparative effectiveness of rational, emotional and discrepant appeals for both high involvement and low involvement products. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15, 27-35.
26.
Hyllegard, K.Ogle, J., & Yan, R-N. ( 2009). The impact of advertising message strategy - fair labour vs. sex appeal - upon Gen Y consumers’ intent to patronize an apparel retailer. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 13(1), 109-127.
27.
Hyllegard, K.H., Yan, R.-N., Ogle, J.P., & Attmann, J. ( 2008). Gen Y’s response to cause-related marketing: The influence of social cause, amount of charitable support, and message appeal on attitudes and purchase intentions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28.
Jacobs, H. ( 2006, September 8). Will sex drive Lee over the edge? B&T Weekly, 56, 3.
29.
Kamp, E., & MacInnis, D.J. (1995). Characteristics, of portrayed emotions in commercials: When does what is shown in ads affect viewers? Journal of Advertising Research, 35, 19-28.
30.
Lafferty, B.A., & Goldsmith, R.E. (2007). Cause-brand alliances: Does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause? Journal of Business Research, 58, 423-429.
31.
LaTour, M.S., & Henthorne, T.L. (1994). Ethical judgments of sexual appeals in print advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23, 81-90.
32.
Lavack, A.M., & Kropp, F. ( 2003). Consumer values and attitude toward cause-related marketing: A cross cultural comparison. Advances in Consumer Research , 30, 377-378.
33.
Loroz, P.S. ( 2006). The generation gap: A Baby Boomer vs. Gen Y comparison of religiosity, consumer values, and advertising appeal effectiveness. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 308-309.
34.
Maciejewski, J.I. ( 2004). Is the use of sexual and fear appeals ethical? A moral evaluation by generation Y college students. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26, 97-105.
35.
Mitchell, A.A., & Olson, J.C. ( 1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 318-332.
36.
National Retail Federation. (2006). Gen Y chooses ‘‘7 For All Mankind’’ as top denim brand, according to RAMA survey. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://nrf.com/modules.php?name=News&op=viewlive&sp_id=159
37.
Nunnally, C. ( 1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
38.
O’Keefe, D.J. ( 1990). Persuasion theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Olsen, G.D., Pracejus, J.W., & Brown, N.R. ( 2003). When profit equals price: Consumer confusion about donation amounts in CRM. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22, 170-180.
40.
Peracchio, L.A., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1994). How ambiguous cropped objects in ad photos can affect product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 190-204.
41.
Peracchio, L.A., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1997). Evaluating persuasion-enhancing techniques from a resource-matching perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 178-191.
42.
Reichert, T. ( 2003). The prevalence of sexual imagery in ads targeted to young adults. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 37, 403-412.
43.
Reichert, T. ( 2007). The ageless allure: Sex, media, and marketing. Journal of Production Management, 13½, 3-11.
44.
Reichert, T., Heckler, S.E., & Jackson, S. ( 2001). The effects of sexual social marketing appeals on cognitive processing and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 30, 13-27.
45.
Sciglimpaglia, D., Belch, M.A., & Cain, R.F. ( 1979). Demographic and cognitive factors influencing viewers’ evaluations of ‘sexy’ advertisements. Advances in Consumer Research, 6, 62-65.
46.
Seckler, V. ( 2005, September 21). Why college students keep spending more . Women’s Wear Daily, 190, 10.
47.
Severn, J., Belch, G.E., & Belch, M.A. ( 1990). The effects of sexual and non-sexual advertising appeals and information level on cognitive processing and communication Effectiveness . Journal of Advertising, 19, 14-22.
48.
Shimp, T.A. ( 1981). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. Journal of Advertising, 10, 9-15.
49.
Silber, G. (Producer). (2006, August 4). 20/20 [Television broadcast]. New York: American Broadcasting Corporation.
50.
Soley, L., & Kurzbard, G. ( 1986). Sex in advertising: A comparison of 1964 and 1984 magazine advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 15, 46-54, 64.
51.
Straub, J. ( 2006). Who’s your daddy? Dov Charney serves up paternalism with a creepy smile at American Apparel HQ. Clamor. Retrieved November 3, 2006, from http://www.clamormagazine.org/issues/38/aa/straub.php
52.
Stole, I. ( 2008). Philanthropy as public relations: A critical perspective on cause marketing. International Journal of Communication , 2, 20-40.
53.
Strom, S. ( 2007, December 13). Charity’s share from shopping raises concern. The New York Times. Retrieved December 13, 2007, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/13/us/13giving.html?_r=2&th=&oref=slogin&emc=th . . .
54.
Trimble, C.S., & Rifon, N.J. ( 2006). Consumer perceptions of compatibility in CRM messages . International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11, 29-47.
55.
Tsai, J.H. ( 2006). Lifestlye vs. demographics: Is lifestyle a better predictor of patronage behavior? Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
56.
Tucker, R. ( 2005, July 12). Diesel’s adventures in sex and denim. Women’s Wear Daily, 190, 19.
57.
Wolburg, J.M., & Pokrywczynski, J. (2001). A psychographic analysis of generation Y college students. Journal of Advertising Research , 41, 33-52.
58.
Zimmerman, A., & Dahlberg, J. ( 2008). The sexual objectification of women in advertising: A contemporary cultural perspective. Journal of Advertising Research, 48, 71-79.
