Commonly perceived as rare, copycat crime has not been sufficiently studied. In an effort to encourage research, this research note offers a refined estimate of the proportion of offenders and at-risk individuals who report personal copycat crime histories. An analysis of 10 estimates spanning 50 years of self-reported copycat crime prevalence among just under 1,500 respondents was conducted. Collectively, the 10 study estimates indicate that about one in four respondents reported personal copycat crime histories. A random effects model indicated that prevalence estimates vary significantly across studies but effect moderators were not able to be identified. Copycat crime was indicated as a characteristic of a substantial number of offenders and at-risk youth. Copycat crime is deserving of more serious research and a number of associated research questions await attention.
BerkowitzL.ParkeR.LeyensJ.WestS.SebastianR. (1978). Experiments on the reactions of juvenile delinquents to filmed violence. In HersovL. A.BergerM. (Eds.), Aggression and antisocial behavior in childhood adolescence (pp. 59-72). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
2.
BruinsmaG. (1989). Scaling and reliability problems in self-reported property crime. In KleinM. (Ed.), Cross-national research in self-reported crime and delinquency (pp. 131-151). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
3.
ChadeeD. (2010a). Copycat crime among Trinidad high risk youth. St. Augustine, Trinidad: ANSA McAL Psychological Research Centre, Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of the West Indies.
4.
ChadeeD. (2010b). Copycat crime among Trinidad low risk youth. St. Augustine, Trinidad: ANSA McAL Psychological Research Centre, Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of the West Indies.
5.
ChadeeD. (2010c). Copycat crime among Trinidad youth training center. St. Augustine, Trinidad: ANSA McAL Psychological Research Centre, Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of the West Indies.
6.
ClarkeR.McGrathG. (1992). Newspaper reports of bank robberies and the copycat phenomenon. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 25, 83-88.
7.
ColemanL. (2004). The copycat effect. New York, NY: Paraview.
8.
DillK.ReddingR.SmithP.SuretteR.CornellD. (2011). Recurrent issues in efforts to prevent homicidal youth violence in schools: Expert opinions. New Directions for Youth Development, 129, 113-128.
9.
DoleyR.SuretteR.FergusonC. (in press). Copycat firesetting: Bridging two research areas. Criminal Justice and Behavior.
10.
EysenckH.NiasD. (1978). Sex, violence and the media. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
11.
FarringtonD. R.LoeberM.Stouthamer-LoeberW.KammenV.SchmidtL. (1996). Self reported delinquency and a combined delinquency seriousness scale based on boys, mothers, and teachers: Concurrent and predictive validity for African Americans and Caucasians. Criminology, 34, 493-517.
12.
FischS. (2002). Vast wasteland or vast opportunity? Effects of educational television on children’s academic knowledge, skills, and attitudes. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 397-426). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
GoetheJ. (1989). The sorrows of young Werther (HulseM., Trans.). London, England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1774)
14.
GreenM.BrockT. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.
HellerM.PolskyS. (1976a). Project III: Television studies with youthful and violent offenders (pilot). In HellerM.PolskyS. (Eds.), Studies in violence and television (pp. 80-95). New York, NY: American Broadcasting Company.
17.
HellerM.PolskyS. (1976b). Project IV: Television viewing, anti-social development and violent behavior—An examination of one hundred young male offenders. In HellerM.PolskyS. (Eds.), Studies in violence and television (pp. 96-152). New York, NY: American Broadcasting.
18.
HendrickG. (1977, January29). When TV is a school for criminals. TV Guide, 10-14.
19.
HuesmannL. (1998). The role of social information processing and cognitive schema in the acquisition and maintenance of habitual aggressive behavior. In GeenR.DonnerstinE. (Eds.), Human aggression (pp. 73-109). New York, NY: Academic Press.
20.
Junger-TasJ.MarshallI. (1999). The self-report methodology in crime research. Crime and Justice, 25, 291-367.
21.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
22.
LindbergN.SailasE.Kaltiala-HeinoR. (2012). The copycat phenomenon after two Finnish school shootings: An adolescent psychiatric perspective. BCM Psychiatry, 12, 91-111.
ManningP. (1998). Media loops. In BaileyF.HaleD. (Eds.), Popular culture, crime and justice (pp. 25-39). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
25.
MeloyJ.MohandieK. (2001). Investigation the role of screen violence in specific homicide cases. Journal of Forensic Science, 46, 1113-1118.
26.
MyersW.EgglestonC.SmoakP. (2003). A media violence-inspired juvenile sexual homicide offender 13 years later. Journal of Forensic Science, 48, 1-6.
27.
O’CarrollP.PotterL. (1994). Suicide contagion and the reporting of suicide: Recommendations from a national workshop. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports, 43, 9-18.
28.
PeaseS.LoveC. (1984, November). The prisoner’s perspective of copycat crime. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology. Cincinnati, OH.
29.
PettyR.PriesterJ.BrinolP. (2002). Mass media attitude change: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In BrantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 155-198). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
PhillipsD.LesynaK.PaightD. (1992). Suicide and the Media. In MarisR.BermanA. (Eds.), Assessment and prediction of suicide (pp. 499-519). New York, NY: Guilford.
RothsteinH. R. (2008). Publication bias as a threat to the validity of meta-analytic results. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4, 61-81.
33.
SaccoV. (2005). When crime waves. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
SchmidA.de GraafJ. (1982). Violence as communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
ShrumL. J. (2002). Media consumption and perceptions of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In BrantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: advances in theory and research (pp. 69-95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
SiegelA. (1974). The effects of media violence on social learning. In ClineV. B. (Ed.), Where do you draw the line? an exploration into media violence, pornography, and censorship (pp. 129-146). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press.
SlaterM.RounerD. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood. Communication Theory, 12, 173-191.
39.
StackS. (1987). Celebrities and suicide: A taxonomy and analysis, 1948-1983. American Sociological Review, 52, 401-412.
40.
StackS. (2000). Media impacts on suicide: A quantitative review of 293 finings. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 957-972.
41.
SteinbergL.MonahanK. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531-1543.
42.
SuretteR. (2002). Self-reported copycat crime among a population of serious and violent juvenile offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 46-69.
43.
SuretteR. (2008). Copycat crime in central Florida. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Criminal Justice, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.
44.
SuretteR. (2010). A survey of offenders regarding media and perceptions of sanctions. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Criminal Justice, University of Central Florida, Orlando.
45.
SuretteR. (2011). Media, crime and criminal justice: Images and realities (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
46.
SuretteR. (2013a). Cause or catalyst: The interaction of real world and media crime models. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 392-409.
47.
SuretteR. (2013b). Pathways to copycat crime. In HelfgottJ. (Ed.), Criminal psychology, Volume 2: Typologies, mental disorders, and profiles (pp. 251-273). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
48.
SuretteR.MazeA. (2013, November). Video game play and copycat crime among incarcerated inmates: An exploratory analysis. Paper to be presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA.
49.
TardeG. (1962). The laws of imitation (ParsonsE. C., Trans.). New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company. (Original work published 1903)
50.
TardeG. (1968). Penal philosophy (HowellR., Trans.). Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith. (Original work published 1912)
51.
TardeG. (1969). L’Opinion et la foule [Opinion and Conversation]. In ClarkT. (Ed. & Trans.), On communication and social influence: Selected papers (pp. 297-318). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1898).
52.
TardeG. (2000). Social laws: An outline of sociology (WarrenH. C., Trans.). Kitchener, Ontario, Canada: Batocke Books. (Original work published 1899).
53.
ThornberryT.KrohnM. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In DuffeeD. (Ed.), Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 33-83). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
54.
ToplinR. (1975). Unchallenged violence: An American ordeal. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
