The roles and obligations of teacher educators have expanded substantially in recent years. Expectations have increased because of national concerns about the overall achievement results of all students and because of specific federal mandates—expressed in reauthorizations of the No Child Left Behind Act and the Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004—about students with disabilities and their access to the general education curriculum and their increased, successful participation in inclusive educational settings. Complicated by the chronic and persistent shortage of special educators and the imperative that general educators have increased skills to address the needs of all struggling learners, demands on special education college and university faculty have magnified. However, the nation continues to face a shortage of faculty who can generate new knowledge about effective practices, translate such research findings into teacher preparation programs’ curriculum, and prepare a sufficient supply of new and highly skilled teachers. In this article, the authors discuss the current policy landscape, connections between the shortage of teachers and the shortage of special education faculty, and the role of the federal government in addressing these shortages. They conclude with a call for national dialogue—necessary so that the continuing cycle of faculty shortages and resulting shortages of those who directly serve students with disabilities may finally be resolved.
Bain, A., Lancaster, J., Zundans, L., & Parkes, R.J. ( 2009). Embedding evidence-based practice in pre-service teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32, 215-225.
2.
Blue Ribbon Task Force Committee. (2004). Draft: Guidelines for OSEP leadership program competition applications. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs and the Higher Education Consortium for Special Education. Retrieved December 14, 2009, from http://www.cgu.edu/pages/5612.asp
3.
Boe, E.E., & Cook, L. ( 2006). The chronic and increasing shortage of fully certified teachers in special and general education. Exceptional Children , 72, 443-460.
4.
Boe, E., Sunderland, B., & Cook, L. ( 2006, November). The supply of teachers from traditional and alternative routes of preparation. Presentation at Teacher Education Division Conference, San Diego, CA .
5.
Boyd, D.J., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Michelli, N., & Wyckoff, J. ( 2006). Complex by design: Investigating pathways into teaching in New York City schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 155-166.
6.
Bradshaw, D., Reinke, W., Brown, L., Bevans, K., & Leaf, P. ( 2008). Implementation of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) in elementary schools: Observations from a randomized trial. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 1-26.
7.
Brownell, M.J.Rosenberg, M.S., Sindelar, P.T., & Smith, D.D. ( 2004). Teacher education: Toward a qualified teacher for every classroom. In A. M. Sorells, H. J. Rieth, & P. T. Sindelar (Eds.), Critical issues in special education (pp. 243-257). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2007). Occupational outlook handbook, 2008-2009 edition: Teachers-special education . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved December 15, 2009, from http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos070.htm
9.
California Department of Education. (2009). Data-quest analysis of California students, staff, and demographics. Retrieved on September 7, 2009, from http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/SpecEd/SpecEd1.asp?cChoice=SpecEd1&cYear=2006/07&cLevel=State&cTopic=SpecEd&myTimeFrame=S&submit1=Submit&ReptCycle=December
10.
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2007 ). Summary of 2007 national summit on universal design for learning working groups. Wakefield, MA: Author.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L. ( 2005, April). Correlation between teachers and student achievement . Presentation at the American Education Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
12.
Darling-Hammond, L. ( 2006a). Constructing 21stcentury teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 300-314.
13.
Darling-Hammond, L. ( 2006b, November). Developing a profession of teaching. Presentation at CalTEACH Annual Faculty Professional Conference , San Jose, CA.
14.
Duncan, A. ( 2009). Teacher preparation: Reforming the uncertain profession . Remarks of secretary Arne Duncan at Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved December 14, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2009/10/10222009.html
15.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act, Pub. L. No. 94-142 (1975).
16.
Evans, S., Eliot, M., Hood, J., Driggs, M., Mori, A., & Johnson, T. ( 2005). Assessing the special education faculty shortage: The crisis in California- A statewide study of the professoriate. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32, 7-21.
17.
Finn, C. E., Jr., Rotherham, A. J., & Hokanson, C. R., Jr. (Eds.). (2001). Conclusions and principles for reform. In C. E. Finn Jr., A. J. Rotherham, & C. R. Hokanson Jr. (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259-288). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and the Progressive Policy Institute.
18.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., & Vaughn, S. (Eds.). (2008). Response to intervention: A framework for reading educators. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
19.
Fuchs, D., & Young, C.L. ( 2006). On the irrelevance of intelligence in predicting responsiveness to reading instruction. Exceptional Children, 73, 8-30.
20.
Futernick, K. ( 2007). A possible dream: Retaining California teachers so all students learn. Sacramento, CA: Center for Teacher Quality.
21.
Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C.M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompon, S., et al. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE No. 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education. Retrieved December 14, 2009, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
22.
Guha, R., Shields, P., Tiffany-Morales, J., Bland, J., & Campbell, A. ( 2008). California’s teaching force: Key issues and trends . Santa Cruz, CA: Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
23.
Higher Education Opportunity Act, Pub. L. No. 110-315 (2008).
24.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, Pub. L. No. 105-17, 111 Stat. 37 (1997).
25.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647.
26.
IRIS Center for Training Enhancements. (2009 ). Universal design for learning: Creating a learning environment that challenges and engages all students. Retrieved on September 4, 2009, from http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/udl/chalcycle.htm
27.
Kleinhammer-Tramill, P.J. ( 2001). The federal role in preparation of special education personnel: An historical perspective. AACTE Policy Perspectives , 2(3), 1-8.
28.
Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D.C. (2003). In harm’s way: How undercertified teachers hurt their students. Educational Leadership , 60, 34-39.
29.
Lyon, G.R., & Weiser, B. ( 2009). Teacher knowledge, instructional expertise, and the development of reading proficiency. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 475-480.
30.
McLeskey, J., Tyler, N., & Flippin, S.S. ( 2004). The supply of and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the nature of the chronic shortage of special education teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 5-21.
31.
Mowbray, C.T., Holter, M.C., Teague, G.B., & Bybee, D. ( 2003). Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation . American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 315-340.
32.
National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. ( 2008). Lessons learned: New teachers talk about their jobs, challenges, and long-range plans. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved December 15, 2009, from http://www.tqsource.org/publications/LessonsLearned3.pdf
33.
National Opinion Research Center. (2009). Graduation trends of special education doctorates. Chicago : Author.
34.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110.
35.
Noell, G.H., Porter, B.A., Patt, R.M., & Dahir, A. (2008). Value added assessment of teacher preparation in Louisiana: 2004-2005 to 2006- 2007. Retrieved December 14, 2009, from http://regents.state.la.us/Academic/TE/2008/Final%20Value-Added%20Report%20(12.02.08).pdf
36.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2009). Application for new grants under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Fiscal year 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
37.
Personnel Improvement Center. (2009). The National Center to Improve the Recruitment and Retention of Qualified Personnel for Children With Disabilities at the National Association for State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE). Retrieved December 14, 2009, from http://www.nasdse.org/Projects/PersonnelImprovementCenter/tabid/414/Default.aspx
38.
Pion, G.M., Smith, D.D., & Tyler, N.C. ( 2003). Career choices of recent doctorates in special education: Their implications for addressing faculty shortages. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26, 182-193.
39.
Rabinowitz S., Sato, E., Case, B.J., Benitez, D., & Jordon, K. ( 2008). Alternate assessment for special education students in the Southwest region states. Received December 14, 2009, from http://www.wested.org/cs/we/view/rstudy/39
40.
Robb, S.M. ( 2007). Claremont Graduate University’s PULSE Pipeline Project to Prepare Urban Leaders in Special Education: Phase Two- Moderate and Severe Disabilities. Claremont, CA: Claremont Graduate University, School of Educational Studies.
41.
Rosenberg, M.S., Boyer, K.L., Sindelar, P.T., & Misra, S.K. ( 2007). Alternative route programs for certification in special education: Program infrastructure, instructional delivery, and participant characteristics. Exceptional Children, 73, 224-241.
42.
Samuels, C.A. ( 2007, October 31). "Universal design" concept pushed for education . Ed Week, p. 1.
43.
Schofer, R. ( 1962). Public Law 85-926. Unpublished manuscript.
44.
Sindelar, P.T., & Rosenberg, M.S. (2003). The demand for faculty in special education: A study of searches conducted in 1997-98. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26(3), 172-181.
45.
Smith, D.D. ( 2009a). Briefing to the OSEP Leadership Team. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs .
46.
Smith, D.D. ( 2009b). SEFNA brief: The federal role in the preparation of special education doctorates [Unpublished report]. Claremont, CA: Claremont Graduate University, Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment.
47.
Smith, D.D., & Lovett, D. ( 1987). The supply and demand of special education faculty members: Will the supply meet the demand? Teacher Education and Special Education, 10, 88-96.
48.
Smith, D.D., Pion, G.M., & Tyler, N.C. ( 2004). Leadership personnel in special education: Can persistent shortages be resolved? In A. M. Sorells, H. J. Rieth, & P. T. Sindelar (Eds.), Critical issues in special education (pp. 258-276). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
49.
Smith, D.D., Pion, G.M., Tyler, N.C., & Gilmore, R. ( 2003). Doctoral programs in special education: The nation’s supplier. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26, 172-181.
50.
Smith, D.D., Pion, G.M., Tyler, N.C., Sindelar, P., & Rosenberg, M. ( 2001). Final report: The study of special education leadership personnel with particular attention to the professoriate (No. H920T97006-100A) . Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University .
51.
Smith, D.D., & Robb. S.M. ( 2009). SEFNA brief: Follow-up of doctoral students supported by OSEP funded leadership preparation projects initiated in fiscal years 2000 and 2001 [Unpublished report]. Claremont, CA: Claremont Graduate University, Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment .
52.
Smith, D.D., & Salzberg, C. ( 1994). The shortage of special education faculty: Toward a better understanding. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 52-61.
53.
Teacher Education Division. (1987). National directory of special education personnel preparation programs. Reston, VA: National Information Center for Children and Youth With Handicaps.
54.
Temkin, J. ( 2002, November 10). Special education shortage starts at universities . Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.chicagotribune.com
55.
Tyler, N.C., Smith, D.D., & Pion, G.M. ( 2003). Doctoral students in special education: Characteristics and career aspirations. Teacher Education and Special Education , 26, 194-205.
56.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Assistance to states for the education of children with disabilities program and the early intervention program for infants and toddlers with disabilities: Final rule. Federal Register, 34(CRF Parts 300 and 301).
57.
U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Part B, Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, implementation of FAPE requirements, 2007 [Data Analysis System, OMB No. 1820-0517; data updated as of July 15, 2008]. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs.
58.
U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Teacher shortage areas nationwide listing 1990-91 thru 2009-10: March 2009 [OMB No. 1840-0595]. Washington, DC: Office of Postsecondary Education Policy and Budget Development Staff.
59.
U.S. Government Accountability Office (2009 ). Teacher preparation: Multiple federal education offices support teacher preparation for instructing students with disabilities and English language learners, but systematic department-wide coordination could enhance this assistance. Washington, DC: Author.
60.
Wasburn-Moses, L., & Therrien, W.J. (2008). The impact of leadership personnel preparation grants on the doctoral student population in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31, 65-76.
61.
West, J. ( 2009). Increasing access to higher education for students with disabilities and strengthening the preparation of professionals who instruct them: The Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 policy and practice. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 22, 189-225.
62.
West, J., & Whitby, P. ( 2008) Federal policy and the education of students with disabilities: Progress and the path forward. Focus on Exceptional Children , 41(3), 1-16.
