Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The authors explore the perceptions related to cohort education models (CEMs) of special education professors and doctoral students at a Carnegie-designated research extensive university in a multicultural, urban area in the southeastern United States. Three themes emerged: (a) Organizational efficiency of CEMs and benefits to student learning outweigh concerns, (b) structure of CEMs impacts students who are not in the CEM, and (c) CEM structure impacts professors. Benefits of a CEM included interstudent support, a flexible learning model, support for culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) learners, opportunities for building trusting relationships, ease in class scheduling, and opportunity for maturation. Presence of the CEM affected the non-CEM students and professors negatively in several ways. Although CEMs are strong mechanisms for supporting students, the faculty must be aware of group cohesion within cohorts to effectively engage the students in the academic process to address the retention problem of doctoral students, decrease the disparity between CEM and non-CEM students, and improve graduate studies programs.

Keywords

special education doctoral programs cohorts

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ali, A. , & Kohun, F. ( 2006). Dealing with isolation feelings in IS doctoral programs . International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 1, 21-33.

Barnett, B.G. , Basom, M.R. , Yerkes, D.M. , & Norris, C.J. ( 2000). Cohorts in educational leadership programs: Benefits, difficulties, and the potential for developing school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 255-282.

Bogdan, R.C. , & Biklen, S.K. ( 2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Cartney, P. , & Rouse, A. ( 2006). The emotional impact of learning in small groups: Highlighting the impact on student progression and retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(1), 79-91.

Culpepper, A. ( 2004). Women graduates’ academic resilience and their personal strategies for doctoral success. Dissertation Abstracts International (UMI No. 3165156). Retrieved July 24, 2007, from http://proquest.umi.com.ezproxy.fiu.edu/

Fact Book. (2001). The multi-year fact book. Florida International University. Retrieved March 7, 2006, from http://www.fiu.edu/~opie/spdi/fbhome.htm

John-Steiner, V. , & Mahn, H. ( 2003). Sociocultural contexts for teaching and learning. In I. B. Weiner, W. M. Reynolds, & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 7. Educational psychology (pp. 125-148). Hoboken, NJ : Wiley.

Merriam, S.B. ( 2002). Assessing and evaluating qualitative research. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (pp. 18-31). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Miller, W.D. , & Irby, B.J. ( 1999). An inquiry into the exigency of a beginning doctoral cohort in educational leadership. College Student Journal , 33(3), 358-363.

10.

Nettles, M.T. , & Millet, C.M. ( 2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph.D. Baltimore: John Hopkins.

11.

Omrod, J.E. ( 2006). Educational psychology: Developing learners (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

12.

Potthoff, D.E. , Fredrickson, S.A. , Batenhorst, E.V. , & Tracy, G.E. ( 2001). Learning about cohorts: A master’s degree program for teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 23(2), 36-42.

13.

Ross, D.D. , Stafford, L. , Church-Pupke, P. , & Bondy, E. ( 2006). Practicing collaboration: What we learn from a cohort that functions well. Teacher Education and Special Education , 29(1), 32-43.

14.

Rubin, J.J. , & Rubin, I.S. ( 2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

15.

Slater, C.L. , & Trowbridge, S. (2000). Master’s level cohorts combat teacher isolation: University/school district collaboration. Action in Teacher Education, 22(1), 15-22.

16.

Smith, D. , Pion, G. , & Tyler, N. ( 2003). Leadership personnel in special education: Can persistent shortages be resolved? In A. Sorrells , H. Rieth , & P. Sindelar (Eds.), Critical issues in special education: Access, diversity, and accountability (pp. 258-276). New York: Pearson.

17.

Smith, D. , Pion, G. , Tyler, N. , & Gilmore, B. ( 2003). Doctoral programs in special education: The nation’s supplier. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26(3), 172-181.

18.

Toseland, R.W. , & Rivas, R.F. ( 1998). An introduction to group work practice (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

19.

Tyler, N. , Smith, D. , & Pion, G. ( 2003). Doctoral students in special education: Characteristics and career aspirations. Teacher Education and Special Education , 26(3), 194-205.