Student performance in mathematics has been linked to the mathematical knowledge of the teacher. Based on this finding, a 5-day professional development module was created to improve teachers’ mathematical knowledge and their understanding of number sense. We found no difference prior to the professional development in mathematical content knowledge for teaching mathematics (CKTM) between special education teachers (at the K-12 level) and general education teachers (K-6). Results revealed that participating teachers made significant gains in mathematical CKTM. Implications and recommendations for professional development in mathematics are provided.
BallD. L. (1992). Magical hopes: Manipulatives and the reform of math education. American Educator, 16, 14-18, 46-47.
2.
BallD. L. (1993). Halves, pieces, and twoths: Constructing and using representation contexts in teaching fractions. In CarpenterT. P.FennemaE.RonbergT. A. (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 157-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
BallD. L.BassH.HillH. C. (2004). Knowing and using mathematical knowledge in teaching: Learning what matters. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference of the South African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Cape Town, South Africa.
5.
BallD. L.CohenD. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8, 14.
6.
BaxterJ. A.WoodwardJ.OlsonD. (2001). Effects of reform-based mathematics instruction on low achievers in five third-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 101, 529-548.
7.
CainC.DoggettM.FaulknerV.HaleC. (2007). The Components of Number Sense. Raleigh: North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Exceptional Children’s Division.
8.
CawleyJ.ParmarR.FoleyT. E.SalmonS.RoyS. (2001). Arithmetic performance of students: Implications for standards and programming. Exceptional Children, 67, 311-328.
9.
CollisonJ.SchwarzJ.CollisonG. (2006). Learning number sense from a broken calculator. On-Math: Online Journal of School Mathematics, 4(1).
10.
ConfreyJ. (2007, February). Tracing the evolution of mathematics content standards’ in the United States: Looking back and projecting forward towards national standards. Paper presented at the Conference on K-12 Mathematics Curriculum Standards, Arlington, VA.
11.
FaulknerV. (2009). The components of number sense: An instructional model for teachers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(5), 24-30.
12.
FaulknerV.CainC.HaleC.DoggettM. (2006). North Carolina math foundations training. Raleigh: North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Exceptional Children’s Division.
13.
FennellF. S.LandisT. E. (1994). Number and operation sense. In ThorntonC. A.BleyN. S. (Eds.), Windows of opportunity: Mathematics for students with special needs (pp. 187-203). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
14.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F.Suk YoonK. (2001). What makes professional development effective: Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
15.
GerstenR.ChardD. (1999). Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 33, 18-28.
16.
GerstenR.ClarkeB. S.JordanN. C. (2007). Screening for mathematics difficulties in K-3 students. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
17.
GerstenR.Ferrini-MundyJ.BenbowC.ClementsD. H.LovelessT.WilliamsV. (2008). Report of the task group on instructional practices. In National Mathematics Advisory Panel: Report of the task groups and subcommittees. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/reports.html
18.
GerstenR.JordanN. C.FlojoJ. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293-304.
19.
GonzalezP.GuzmanJ. C.PartelowL.PahlkeE.JocelynL.KastbergD.WilliamsT. (2004). Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003 (NCES 2005-005). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
20.
GriffinS. (2003). The development of math competence in the preschool and early school years: Cognitive foundations and instructional strategies. In RoyerJ. M. (Ed.), Mathematical cognition (pp. 1-25). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
21.
GuskeyT. R. (2002). Staff development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381-391.
22.
HiebertJ.StiglerJ. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS video study. Elementary School Journal, 101, 3-20.
23.
HillH. C. (2008). Developing measures of mathematical knowledge for teaching: Instrument dissemination workshop: Content Knowledge for teaching mathematics measures and Learning mathematics for teaching/Study of instructional improvement. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
24.
HillH. C.BallD. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 330-351.
25.
HillH. C.BallD. L.SchillingS. G. (2008). Unpacking “pedagogical content knowledge”: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372-400.
26.
HillH. C.LubienskiS. T. (2007). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching and school context: A study of California teachers. Educational Policy, 21, 747-768.
27.
HillH. C.RowanB.BallD. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371-406.
28.
JitendraA. K.HoffK.BeckM. M. (1999). Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities to solve word problems using a schema-based approach. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 50-64.
29.
KimmelmanP.KroezeD.SchmidtW.van der PloegA.McNeelyM.TanA. (1999). A first look at what we can learn from high performing school districts: An analysis of TIMSS data from the first in the world consortium. Chicago, IL: First in the World Consortium, U.S. Department of Education.
30.
KalchmannM.MossJ.CaseR. (2001). Psychological models for the development of mathematical understanding: Rational numbers and functions in CarverS.M.KaherD. (Eds.) Cognition and instruction, Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
KnuthE. (2002). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 61-88.
32.
KroesbergenE. H.LuitJ. E. H. V. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97-114.
33.
MaL. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
MacciniP.GagnonJ. C. (2002). Perceptions and application of NCTM standards by special and general education teachers. Exceptional Children, 68, 325-344.
35.
Mathematics Learning Study Committee, National Research Council. (2001). Front matter. In KilpatrickJ.SwaffordJ.FindellB. (Eds.), Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (pp. 1-14). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
36.
MayerR. E. (2003). Mathematical problem solving. In RoyerJ. M. (Ed.), Mathematical cognition: A volume in current perspectives on cognition, learning, and instruction (pp. 69-92). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
37.
MercerC. D.MillerS. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13(3), 19-35.
38.
MillerS. P.MercerC. D. (1994). Using data to learn about concrete-semiconcrete-abstract instruction for students with math disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 89-96.
39.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). Highlights from TIMSS: Overview and key findings (1998-081). Washington, DC: Author.
40.
SilverE. A. (1998). Improving mathematics in middle school: Lessons from TIMSS and related research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
StiglerJ. W.PerryM. (1990). Mathematics, lerning in Japanese, Chinese, and American classrooms. In StiglerJ. W.SchwederR. A.HerdtG. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 328-353). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
WoodwardJ. (2004). Mathematics education in the United States: Past to present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 16-31.
45.
WoodwardJ.MontagueM. (2002). Meeting the challenge of mathematics reform for students with LD. Journal of Special Education, 36, 89-101.
