Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Collaboration across teacher education in the service of a more inclusive preservice pedagogy is now taking place within a context of high intensity accountability that includes the widespread adoption of the edTPA. This analysis explores how teacher educators in special and general education might advance the preparation of preservice students for inclusive teaching when faculty are obliged to use the edTPA to measure candidate learning. Drawing on Atul Gawande’s (2009) work in the field of medicine related to the value of using checklists to improve outcomes among experts in practical settings, the author proposes the Teacher Education for Inclusion Checklist. This tool is designed to help overcome the underappreciated power of the historical divide between general and special education, which often serves as a default position for how teacher educators work together, and to provide guidance for how faculty might engage in dialogue across the assessments mandated by the edTPA.

Keywords

teacher performance assessment edTPA inclusion teacher preparation practices and outcomes Atul Gawande collaboration preservice teacher education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blanton

L. P.

Pugach

M. C.

(2017). A dynamic model for the next generation of research on teacher education for inclusion. In Florian

Pantić

(Eds.), Teacher education for the changing demographics of schooling: Issues for Research and Practice (pp. 215-228). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Cochran-Smith

Dudley-Marling

(2012). Diversity in teacher education and special education: The issues that divide. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 237-244.

Federico

M. A.

Herald

W. G.

Venn

(1999). Helpful tips for successful inclusion: A checklist for educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31, 76-82.

Gawande

(2009). The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. New York, NY: Picador.

Ledwell

Oyler

(2016). Unstandardized responses to a “standardized” test: The edTPA as gatekeeper and curricular change agent. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 120-134.

Pugach

M. C.

(2005). What do we know about preparing teachers to work with students with disabilities? In Cochran-Smith

Zeichner

(Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 549-590). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Pugach

M. C.

Blanton

L. P.

Florian

(2012). Unsettling conversations: Diversity and disability in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 235-236.

Pugach

M. C.

Blanton

L. P.

Mickelson

Kleinhammer-Trammill

(2013, April). A policy analysis of federal support for inclusive teacher education: Slouching toward transformation? Paper presented at the annual meeting, American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Pugach

M. C.

Gomez-Najarro

Mukhopadhyay

(2014, April). Long overdue: Rethinking research on social justice in teacher education from an intersectionality perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting, American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.

10.

Pugach

M. C.

Peck

(2016). Dividing practices: Pre-service teacher quality assessment and the (re)production of relations between general and special education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 43(3), 3-23.

11.

Technical Terms: Default. (2016). Retrieved from http://techterms.com/definition/default

12.

Villa

Thousand

(2016). The inclusive education checklist. Naples, FL: National Professional Resources.

13.

Villegas

A. M.

(2012). Collaboration between multicultural and special educators: Pulling together the threads in the conversation. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 286-290.