Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article provides a multidimensional approach to evaluating the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) program as administered in the Chicago metropolitan area. The MEP concept is based on the provision of technology-related services to address many of the manufacturing productivity-improvement barriers. Using a variety of qualitative and quantitative techniques, this research demonstrates that delivery of these services has been somewhat limited in practice. After demonstrating that the Chicago Manufacturing Center and MEP are not delivering primarily technologyrelated services to small and midsized manufacturing firms, the author raises the question of legitimacy. This finding suggests that the program needs to be redesigned to more adequately account for current economic and market conditions, taking into account the way small and midsized manufacturers process information and make decisions.

Keywords

manufacturing extension program evaluation economic development economic impact

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carlisle, R. (1997). The influence of evaluation on technology policy-making & program justification: A state level perspective. In P. Shapira & J. Youtie (Eds.), Manufacturing modernization: Learning fromevaluation practices and results(pp. 119-126). Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Public Policy, & Georgia Tech Economic Development Institute.

Carlisle, R. (1998). Linking industrial modernization evaluation with state policy making. Journal of Technology Transfer, 23(1), 49-54.

Davila, N. (2001). The effectiveness of manufacturing extension: Economic development versus technology-diffusion policy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.

Economic focus: Investment boom to bust . (2001, March 3). The Economist, 3, 72-72.

Ehlen, M. (2001). The economic impact of manufacturing extension centers. Economic Development Quarterly, 15, 36-44.

Feller, I. (1994). Issues in the evaluation of technology modernization programs. In P. Shapira , D. Roessner , & J. Youtie (Eds.), Evaluating industrial modernization programs: Issues, practices, and strategies(pp. 18-25). Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Public Policy, & Georgia Tech Economic Development Institute.

General Accounting Office . (1996). Manufacturing extension programs: Manufacturers’ views about delivery and impact of services. Washington, DC: Author.

Mendelowitz, A. (1995). Overview of GAO’s study of companies’ perspective on manufacturing extension program services. In P. Shapira & J. Youtie (Eds.), Evaluating industrial modernization: Methods and results in the evaluation of industrial modernization programs(pp. 156-158). Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Public Policy,& Georgia Tech Economic Development Institute.

Mininger, L. (1994). General Accounting Office perspectives in evaluating federal technology-related programs. In P. Shapira , D. Roessner ,& J. Youtie (Eds.), Evaluating industrial modernization programs: Issues, practices, and strategies(pp. 77-87). Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Public Policy, & Georgia Tech Economic Development Institute.

10.

National Research Council . (1993). Learning to change: Opportunities to improve the performance of smallermanufacturers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

11.

Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act. (1988, August 23). Public Law No. 100-418.

12.

Performance Benchmarking Service . (1997). Internal investigation, Industrial Technology Institute, Ann Arbor, MI.

13.

Reamer, A. D. (1995). Institutional assessment of technology programs. In P. Shapira & J. Youtie (Eds.), Evaluating industrial modernization: Methods and results in the evaluation of industrial modernization programs(pp. 122-127). Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Public Policy, and Georgia Tech Economic Development Institute.

14.

Rhoades, S. (1998). The importance of manufacturing extension—A state perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 23(1), 13-16.

15.

Shapira, P. (1990). Modern times: Learning from state initiatives in industrial extension and technology transfer. Economic Development Quarterly, 4, 186-202.

16.

Shapira, P. , Roessner, D. , & Youtie, J. (1994). Current practices in the evaluation of industrial modernization programs. In P. Shapira , D. Roessner ,& J. Youtie (Eds.), Evaluating industrial modernization programs: Issues, practices, and strategies(pp. 1-17). Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Public Policy, & Georgia Tech Economic Development Institute.