Abstract
Economic developers and planners can use more than anchor tenants and place-bound anchor institutions to secure development, but not all anchors are equally durable. Place-bound, or place-rooted, anchor institutions are unlikely to relocate in response to changes in settlement patterns or business consolidations, providing a strong foundation for community development. However, anchor institutions are scarce. In contrast, most community development investments are tethered to more plentiful, but more ephemeral, anchors: anchor tenants, third places, and managed or naturally occurring third spaces. Ensuring that the right anchor is used on a particular water's bottom—the specific land use and geographic scale of a project's impact—requires understanding which anchor best secures a development or regional economy. A survey of agricultural extension agents revealed that the strength of an anchor comes from its community and economic VALUE: visibility, authenticity, loyalty, utility, and engagement.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
