While much disinhibition in dementia results from generalized impulsivity, in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) disinhibition may also result from impaired social cognition.
Objective:
To deconstruct disinhibition and its neural correlates in bvFTD vs. early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (eAD).
Methods:
Caregivers of 16 bvFTD and 21 matched-eAD patients completed the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale disinhibition items. The disinhibition items were further categorized into (1) “person-based” subscale which predominantly associated with violating social propriety and personal boundary and (2) “generalized-impulsivity” subscale which included nonspecific impulsive acts. Subscale scores were correlated with grey matter volumes from tensor-based morphometry on magnetic resonance images.
Results:
In comparison to the eAD patients, the bvFTD patients developed greater person-based disinhibition (P < 0.001) but comparable generalized impulsivity. Severity of person-based disinhibition significantly correlated with the left anterior superior temporal sulcus (STS), and generalized-impulsivity correlated with the right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the left anterior temporal lobe (aTL).
Conclusions:
Person-based disinhibition was predominant in bvFTD and correlated with the left STS. In both dementia, violations of social propriety and personal boundaries involved fronto-parieto-temporal network of Theory of Mind, whereas nonspecific disinhibition involved the OFC and aTL.
RascovskyKHodgesJRKnopmanDSensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134(pt 9):2456–2477.
2.
LambertMABickelHPrinceMEstimating the burden of early onset dementia: systematic review of disease prevalence. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(4):563–569.
3.
HenryJDPhillipsLHvon HippelC. A meta-analytic review of theory of mind difficulties in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia. Neuropsychologia. 2014;56c:53–62.
NeumannMTolnayMMackenzieIR. The molecular basis of frontotemporal dementia. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2009;11:e23.
6.
ParviziJ. Disinhibition: more than a misnomer. Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(3):311–316.
7.
StarksteinSEGarauMLCaoA. Prevalence and clinical correlates of disinhibition in dementia. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2004;17(3):139–147.
8.
JoshiABarsugliaJPMatherMJJimenezEEShapiraJMendezMF. Evaluation of emotional blunting in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia compared to Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord2014;38(1-2):79–88.
9.
ZamboniGHueyEDKruegerFNichelliPFGrafmanJ.Apathy and disinhibition in frontotemporal dementia: insights into their neural correlates. Neurology. 2008;71(10):736–742.
10.
RosenHJAllisonSCSchauerGFGorno-TempiniMLWeinerMWMillerBL. Neuroanatomical correlates of behavioural disorders in dementia. Brain. 2005;128(pt 11):2612–2625.
11.
HornbergerMGengJHodgesJR. Convergent grey and white matter evidence of orbitofrontal cortex changes related to disinhibition in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134(pt 9):2502–2512.
Brunet-GouetEDecetyJ. Social brain dysfunctions in schizophrenia: a review of neuroimaging studies. Psychiatry Res. 2006;148(2-3):75–92.
14.
Van OverwalleF. Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(3):829–858.
15.
McKhannGMKnopmanDSChertkowHThe diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2011;7(3):263–269.
16.
JoshiARingmanJMLeeASJuarezKOMendezMF. Comparison of clinical characteristics between familial and non-familial early onset Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol. 2012;259(10):2182–2188.
17.
StoutJCReadyREGraceJMalloyPFPaulsenJS. Factor analysis of the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe). Assessment. 2003;10(1):79–85.
18.
MalloyPTremontGGraceJFrakeyL. The Frontal Systems Behavior Scale discriminates frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2007;3(3):200–203.
19.
CummingsJLMegaMGrayKRosenberg-ThompsonSCarusiDAGornbeinJ. The neuropsychiatric inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994;44(12):2308–2314.
20.
AbramsRTaylorMA. A rating scale for emotional blunting. Am J Psychiatry. 1978;135(2):226–229.
21.
FillenbaumGGvan BelleGMorrisJCConsortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD): the first twenty years. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2008;4(2):96–109.
22.
JensenARRohwerWDJr. The Stroop color-word test: a review. Acta Psychol1966;25(1):36–93.
23.
TombaughTN. Trail making test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19(2):203–214.
24.
BarryDBatesMELabouvieE. FAS and CFL forms of verbal fluency differ in difficulty: a meta-analytic study. Appl Neuropsychol. 2008;15(2):97–106.
25.
HomackSLeeDRiccioCA. Test review: Delis-Kaplan executive function system. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005;27(5):599–609.
26.
MorrisJC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43(11):2412–2414.
27.
BorroniBAgostiCPremiEThe FTLD-modified Clinical Dementia Rating Scale is a reliable tool for defining disease severity in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: evidence from a brain SPECT study. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(5):703–707.
28.
MazziottaJTogaAEvansAA four-dimensional probabilistic atlas of the human brain. J Am Med Informat Assoc. 2001;8(5):401–430.
29.
LeowAHuangSCGengAInverse consistent mapping in 3D deformable image registration: its construction and statistical properties. Inf Proc Med Imaging. 2005;19:493–503.
30.
ShattuckDWPrasadGMirzaMNarrKLTogaAW. Online resource for validation of brain segmentation methods. NeuroImage. 2009;45(2):431–439.
31.
LeeGJLuPHMedinaLDRegional brain volume differences in symptomatic and presymptomatic carriers of familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(2):154–162.
32.
DinovILozevKPetrosyanPNeuroimaging study designs, computational analyses and data provenance using the LONI pipeline. PLoS one. 2010;5(9).
33.
PerriRMonacoMFaddaLCaltagironeCCarlesimoGA. Neuropsychological correlates of behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease, frontal variant of frontotemporal, subcortical vascular, and Lewy body dementias: a comparative study. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2014;39(3):669–677.
34.
TanakaHHashimotoMFukuharaRRelationship between dementia severity and behavioural and psychological symptoms in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Psychogeriatrics. 2015;15(4):242–247.
35.
FinebergNAPotenzaMNChamberlainSRProbing compulsive and impulsive behaviors, from animal models to endophenotypes: a narrative review. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35(3):591–604.
36.
BecharaADamasioHDamasioAR. Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex. 2000;10(3):295–307.
37.
MassimoLPowersCMoorePNeuroanatomy of apathy and disinhibition in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disorder. 2009;27(1):96–104.
38.
PetersFPeraniDHerholzKOrbitofrontal dysfunction related to both apathy and disinhibition in frontotemporal dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disorder. 2006;21(5-6):373–379.
39.
RaczkaKABeckerGSeeseAExecutive and behavioral deficits share common neural substrates in frontotemporal lobar degeneration—a pilot FDG-PET study. Psychiatry Res. 2010;182(3):274–280.
40.
GlosserGZwilASGlosserDSO’ConnorMJSperlingMR. Psychiatric aspects of temporal lobe epilepsy before and after anterior temporal lobectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;68(1):53–58.
41.
SchroeterMLVogtBFrischSDissociating behavioral disorders in early dementia—an FDG-PET study. Psychiatry Res. 2011;194(3):235–244.
42.
CeramiCDodichACanessaNNeural correlates of empathic impairment in the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2014;10(6):827–834.
43.
EslingerPJMoorePAndersonCGrossmanM. Social cognition, executive functioning, and neuroimaging correlates of empathic deficits in frontotemporal dementia. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;23(1):74–82.
44.
IrishMHodgesJRPiguetO. Right anterior temporal lobe dysfunction underlies theory of mind impairments in semantic dementia. Brain. 2014;137(pt 4):1241–1253.
45.
CoutoBManesFMontanesPStructural neuroimaging of social cognition in progressive non-fluent aphasia and behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:467.
46.
SamsonDApperlyIAChiavarinoCLeft temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else’s belief. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(5):499–500.
47.
JeannerodM. Visual and action cues contribute to the self-other distinction. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(5):422–423.
48.
SchnellKBluschkeSKonradtBWalterH. Functional relations of empathy and mentalizing: an fMRI study on the neural basis of cognitive empathy. NeuroImage. 2011;54(2):1743–1754.
49.
DeenBKoldewynKKanwisherNSaxeR. Functional organization of social perception and cognition in the superior temporal sulcus. Cerebral Cortex. 2015;25(11):4596–4609.
50.
HeinGKnightRT. Superior temporal sulcus—it’s my area: or is it?J Cogn Neurosci. 2008;20(12):2125–2136.
51.
KempJDespresOSellalFDufourA. Theory of Mind in normal ageing and neurodegenerative pathologies. Ageing Res Rev. 2012;11(2):199–219.
