Research and practice in external rhetoric often fall short of ideals both in terms of widespread use of a rhetorical perspective and in achieving dialogic conditions in the public sphere. In this response, the authors consider potential explanations for this shortfall, focusing on challenges that exist on a theoretical level within organizational rhetoric scholarship and on a practical level as individuals and organizations interact.
Bitzer. L. ( 1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1) 1-14.
2.
Boyd, J., & Waymer, D. ( 2011). Organizational Rhetoric: A Subject of Interest(s). Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 474-493.
3.
Burke, K. ( 1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Cloud, D. ( 1994). The materiality of discourse as oxymoron. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 141-163.
5.
Deetz, S. ( 1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany, NY: SUNY.
6.
Deetz, S. ( 2008). Engagement as co-generative theorizing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 289-297.
7.
Feldner, S.L., & Meisenbach, R.J. (2007). Saving Disney: Finding a voice for (counter) publics through the Internet. In S. C. Duhé (Ed.), New media and public relations (pp. 189-201). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Kent, M.L., & Taylor, M. ( 2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21-37.
10.
Putnam, L.L., & Fairhurst, G.T. (2001). Discourse analysis in organizations: Issues and concerns. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 78-136). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
Taylor, M. ( 2011). Building Social Capital Through Rhetoric and Public Relations . Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 436-454.
12.
Weick, K.E. ( 1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-652.
