This study employs the perspective of organizational resilience to examine how information and communication technologies (ICTs) were used by organizations to aid in their recovery after Hurricane Katrina. In-depth interviews enabled longitudinal analysis of ICT use. Results showed that organizations enacted a variety of resilient behaviors through adaptive ICT use, including information sharing, (re)connection, and resource acquisition. Findings emphasize the transition of ICT use across different stages of recovery, including an anticipated stage. Key findings advance organizational resilience theory with an additional source of resilience, external availability. Implications and contributions to the literature of ICTs in disaster contexts and organizational resilience are discussed.
ArnoldJ.LevineB.ManmathaR.LeeF.ShenoyP.TasiM.WalshD. (2004). Information-sharing in out-of-hospital disaster response: The future role of information technology. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 19(3), 201-207.
2.
BruneauM.ChangS.EguchiR. T.LeeG. C.O’RourkeT. D.ReinhornA. M.von WinterfeldtD. (2002). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance seismic resilience of communities. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo.
3.
CareyJ. (2003). Media use during a crisis. In. Michael NollA. (Ed.), Crisis communications: Lessons from September 11 (pp. 1-16). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
4.
DoerfelM. L.LaiC.-H.ChewningL. V. (2010). The evolutionary role of interorganizational communication: Modeling social capital in disaster contexts. Human Communication Research, 36(2), 125-162.
5.
DuttonW. H.NainoaF. (2003). The social dynamics of wireless on September 11: Reconfiguring access. In NollM. (Ed.), Crisis communication: Lessons learned from September 11 (pp. 69-82). Lanham, MD: Rowtman &Littlefield.
6.
FaulknerB. (2001). Towards a framework for tourism disaster management. Tourism Management, 22, 135-147.
7.
FinkS. (1986). Crisis management. New York: American Association of Management.
8.
HeifetzR.GrashowA.LinskyM. (2009). Leadership in a (permanent) crisis. Harvard Business Review, 87(7/8), 62-69.
HughesA. L.PalenL. (2009). Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference–Gothenburg, Sweden.
11.
KatzJ.RiceR. (2002). The telephone as a medium of faith, hope, terror, and redemption: America, September 11. Prometheus, 20(3), 247-253.
12.
KendraJ. M. (2001). Resilience. Internal working paper. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware., Newark
13.
KendraJ.WachtendorfT. (2003). Elements of resilience after the World Trade Center disaster: Reconstituting New York City’s Emergency Operations Centre. Disasters, 27(1), 37-53.
14.
MaciasW.HilyardK.FreimuthV. (2009). Blog functions as risk and crisis communication during Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 1-31.
15.
MarkG.SemaanB. (2008). Resilience in collaboration: Technology as a resource for new patterns of action. In Proceedings of the CSCW Conference (pp. 137-146). New York: ACM Press.
16.
MarkG.Al-AniB.SemaanB. (2009). Resilience through technology adoption: Merging the old and the new in Iraq. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, (pp. 689-698). New York: ACM Press.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404-428.
19.
PerryD. C.TaylorM.DoerfelM. L. (2003). Internet-based communication in crisis management. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(2), 206-232.
20.
ProcopioC.ProcopioS. (2007). Do you know what it means to miss New Orleans? Internet communication, geographic community, and social capital in crisis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35(1), 67-87.
21.
QuarantelliE. L. (2006). Catastrophes are different from disasters: Some implications for crisis planning and managing drawn from Katrina. New York: Social Science Research Council. Retrieved http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Quarantelli
22.
ReddyM. C.PaulS. A.AbrahamJ.McNeeseM.DeFlitchC.YenJ. (2009). Challenges to effective crisis management: Using information and communication technologies to coordinate emergency medical services and emergency department teams. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(4), 259-269.
23.
ShklovskiI.BurkeM.KieslerS.KrautR. (2008). Technology adoption and use in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. Position paper for the HCI for Emergencies workshop Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI 2008), Florence, Italy.
24.
StephensK. K. (2007). The successive use of information and communication technologies at work. Communication Theory, 17, 486-507.
25.
SutcliffeK. M.VogusT. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In CameronK. S.DuttonJ. E.QuinnR. E. (Eds), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 94-110). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
26.
SuttonJ.PalenL.ShklovskiI. (2008). Backchannels on the front lines: Emergent uses of social media in the 2007 Southern California Wildfires. In Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference, Washington, DC.
27.
TaylorM.KentM. L. (2007). A taxonomy of crisis response on the Internet. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 140-146.
28.
TaylorM.PerryD. (2005). Diffusion of traditional and new media tactics in crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 31(2), 209-217.
29.
UlmerR. R.SeegerM. W.SellnowT. L. (2007). Post-crisis communication and renewal: Expanding the parameters of post-crisis discourse. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 130-134.
30.
VeilS. R.BuehnerT.PalencharM. J. (2011). A work-in-process literature review: Incorporating social media in risk and crisis Communication. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 19, 110-122.
31.
WeickK. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-652.
