Drawing upon the theoretical roots of Montreal school communicative constitution of organizing (CCO), this study extends the notion of “authoritative texts” (Kuhn, 2008) to loose, emergent, and fluid forms of organizing. Based on interviews and observations among a fluid collective of bicyclists that maintain a public jump course, findings show how repetitive stories and labor analogies are communicative elements giving rise to an authoritative text, that, although imperfect in many ways, exerts influence on organizing practices. Despite lacking conventional organizational structures, the article demonstrates how the emergence and disciplining function of authoritative texts is made possible by a unique form of indirect assertive speech acts. This work contributes to organizational communication theory by extending authoritative text research to fluid organizing, theorizing differences in the coorientation and scaling up processes forming authoritative texts, and providing precise explanations of how texts discipline through intertextual relations.
AhrneG.BrunssonN. (2011). Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization. Organization, 18(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410376256
2.
AustinJ. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
3.
Benoit-BarnéC.CoorenF. (2009). The accomplishment of authority through presentification: How authority is distributed among and negotiated by organizational members. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335414
4.
BlaschkeS.FrostJ.HattkeF. (2014). Towards a micro foundation of leadership, governance, and management in universities. Higher Education, 68(5), 711–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9740-2
5.
BourgoinA.BencherkiN.FarajS. (2020). And who are you?”: A performative perspective on authority in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 63(4), 1134–1165. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1335
6.
BrummansB. H.CoorenF.RobichaudD.TaylorJ. R. (2014). Approaches to the communicative constitution of organizations. In PutnamL. L.MumbyD. K. (Eds), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 173–194). SAGE.
CoorenF. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism. John Benjamins.
12.
CoorenF.BrummansB. H.HighamL. (2022). You’re putting words in my mouth!”: Interaction as mutual ventriloquation. Communication Research and Practice, 9(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2022.2141862
13.
CoorenF.FairhurstG. (2009). Dislocation and stabilization: How to scale up from interactions to organization. In PutnamL. L.NicoteraA. M. (Eds), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 117–152). Taylor & Francis.
14.
CoorenF.SeidlD. (2022). The theoretical roots of CCO. In BasqueJ.BencherkiN.KuhnT. (Eds), The Routledge handbook of communicative constitution of organization (pp. 27–46). Routledge.
15.
CruzJ. M.SodekeC. U. (2020). Debunking eurocentrism in organizational communication theory: Marginality and liquidities in postcolonial contexts. Communication Theory, 31(3), 528–548. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz038
16.
DawsonV. (2017). Communicative theory of the firm. In ScottC. R.LewisL. (Eds), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc036
17.
DobuschL.SchoenebornD. (2015). Fluidity, identity, and organizationality: The communicative constitution of Anonymous. Journal of Management Studies, 52(8), 1005–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12139
18.
FayolH. (1949). General and industrial management. Pitman.
19.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter.
20.
GreimasA. J. (1987). On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. University of Minnesota Press.
21.
HolmF.FairhurstG. T. (2018). Configuring shared and hierarchical leadership through authoring. Human Relations, 71(5), 692–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717720803
22.
KahnW. A.KramK. E. (1994). Authority at work: Internal models and their organizational consequences. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 17–50. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410122007
23.
KoschmannM. A. (2013). The communicative constitution of collective identity in interorganizational collaboration. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318912449314
KoschmannM. A.McDonaldJ. (2015). Organizational rituals, communication, and the question of agency. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(2), 229–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915572386
26.
KuhnT. (2008). A communicative theory of the firm: Developing an alternative perspective on intra-organizational power and stakeholder relationships. Organization Studies, 29(8-9), 1227–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608094778
27.
KuhnT. (2017). Communicatively constituting organizational unfolding through counter-narrative. In FrandsenS.KuhnT.LundholtM. W. (Eds), Counter-narratives and organization (pp. 17–42). Routledge.
28.
KuhnT.AshcraftK. L.CoorenF. (2017). The work of communication: Relational perspectives on working and organizing in contemporary capitalism. Routledge.
29.
LindlofT. R.TaylorB. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
30.
LockeK.Golden-BiddleK.FeldmanM. (2008). Perspective—making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science, 19(6), 907–918. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0398
31.
RicoeurP.BlameyK.ThompsonJ. B. (1986). From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics II. Northwestern University Press., Trans.).
32.
SearleJ. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
33.
ShanahanG. (2022). ‘No decision is permanent!’: Achieving democratic revisability in alternative organizations through the affordances of new information and communication technologies. Human relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00187267221112821
34.
TaylorJ. R.CoorenF.GirouxN.RobichaudD. (1996). The communicational basis of organization: Between the conversation and the text. Communication Theory, 6(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00118.x
35.
TaylorJ. R.RobichaudD. (2004). Finding the organization in the communication: Discourse as action and sensemaking. Organization, 11(3), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404041999
36.
TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication at its site and surface. Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
TaylorJ. R.Van EveryE. J. (2011). The situated organization. Case studies in the pragmatics of communication research. Routledge.
38.
TimmermansS.TavoryI. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
39.
VásquezC.SchoenebornD.SergiV. (2016). Summoning the spirits: Organizational texts and the (dis)ordering properties of communication. Human Relations, 69(3), 629–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715589422
40.
WeberM. (1946). From max weber: Essays in sociology. (GerthH. H.Wright MillC., Trans., and eds) Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
