Nursing theories are like myths, in that they contain symbolic representations that tell a story about nursing, and these stories represent or explain nursing’s image, worldview, beliefs, and practices. Five theories are analyzed to identify the myths that they represent. It is proposed that uncovering the myth in nursing theories will help to communicate nursing brands that convey the essence and value of nursing.
Barrett, E. A. M. (1990). Health patterning with clients in a private practice environment. In E. A. M. Barrett (Ed.), Visions of Rogers’ science-based practice (pp. 105-115). New York: National League for Nursing.
2.
Boykin, A., & Schoenhofer, S. O. (1991). Story as link between nursing practice, ontology, epistemology. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23, 245-248.
3.
Cowling, W. R. (1990). A template for unitary pattern-based nursing practice. In E. A. M. Barrett (Ed.), Visions of Rogers’ science-based practice (pp. 45-65). New York: National League for Nursing.
4.
Dominiak, M. C. (2004). The concept of branding: Is it relevant to nursing?Nursing Science Quarterly, 17, 295-300.
5.
Langer, S. K. (1957). Philosophy in a new key. A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Malinski, V. M. (2001). Martha E. Rogers: Science of unitary human beings. In M. E. Parker (Ed.), Nursing theories and nursing practice (pp. 193-204). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
7.
Mish, F. C. (Ed.). (1999). Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (10th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
8.
Mitchell, G. J., & Cody, W. K. (1999). Human becoming theory: A complement to medical science. Nursing Science Quarterly, 14, 304-310.
9.
Myth. (2005). Britannica concise encyclopedia. Retrieved February 27, 2005, from Encyclopædia Britannica Premium Service, http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?tocId=23557
10.
Neil, R. M. (2001). Caring for the human spirit in the workplace. In M. Parker (Ed.), Nursing theories and nursing practice (pp. 355-360). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
11.
Neuman, B. (2002). The Neuman systems model. In B. Neuman & J. Fawcett (Eds.), The Neuman systems model (pp. 3-33). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
Orem, D. E. (1991). Nursing: Concepts of practice (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
13.
Orem, D. E. (1997). Views of human beings specific to nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 26-31.
14.
Parse, R. R. (1981). Man-living-health: A theory of nursing. New York: John Wiley.
15.
Parse, R. R. (1992). The performing art of nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 147-147.
16.
Parse, R. R. (1998). The human becoming school of thought: A perspective for nurses and other health professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Parse, R. R. (2004). The many meanings of unitary: A plea for clarity. Nursing Science Quarterly, 17, 293-293.
18.
Philpin, S. M. (2002). Rituals and nursing: A critical commentary. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38, 144-151.
19.
Rogers, M. E. (1970). An introduction to the theoretical basis of nursing. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
20.
Segal, R. A. (Ed.). (1996). Literary criticism and myth. New York: Garland Publishing.
21.
Symbol. (2005). Britannica concise encyclopedia. Retrieved March 5, 2005, from Encyclopædia Britannica Premium Service, http://www.britannica.com/ebc/article?tocId=9380033
22.
Vickery, J. B. (1996). Literature and myth. In R. A. Segal (Ed.), Literary criticism and myth (pp. 283-305). New York: Garland Publishing.
23.
Watson, J. (1999). Postmodern nursing and beyond. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
24.
Watson, J. (2001). Theory of human caring. In M. E. Parker (Ed.), Nursing theories and nursing practice (pp. 344-354). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
25.
Watson, J. (2005). Caring science as sacred science. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
26.
Watson, J., & Smith, M. (2002). Caring science and the science of unitary human beings: A trans-theoretical discourse for nursing knowledge development. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37, 452-461.
