“The Next Generations” in family firms are the key to the survival of the sector, yet gaps remain in the knowledge about their relationship with the firm. This research focuses on the determinants of this relationship. The concept of emotional ownership emerged as an explanatory variable in a qualitative study, followed by a quantitative study, where the authors report the development of a robust measure and identify its key predictors using a large sample. Results include confirmation that emotional ownership is orthogonal to actual ownership, yet an outcome of behaviors, structures, and strategies within the control of families and their firms.
AdlerP. A.AdlerP. (1988). Intense loyalty in organizations: A case study of college athletics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 401-417.
2.
AgarM. (1986). Speaking of ethnography. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
3.
AmbroseM. L.SchminkeM. (2003). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 295-305.
4.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
5.
BjörnbergÅ.NicholsonN. (2007). Family climate: The development of a new measure for use in family business research. Family Business Review, 20, 229-246.
6.
BladerS. L.TylerT. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 9, 445-464.
7.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Basic Books.
BowlbyJ. (1980). Attachment and loss. New York, NY: Basic Books.
10.
BrewerM. B.GardnerW. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
11.
BricksonS. L. (2005). Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 576-609.
12.
Cabrera-SuarezK.De Saa-PerezP.Garcia-AlmeidaD. (2001). The succession process from a resource and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 11-24.
13.
CardadorM. T.PrattM. G. (2006). Identification management and its bases: Bridging management and marketing perspectives through a focus on affiliation dimensions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 34, 174-184.
14.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (1998). Important attributes of successors in family businesses: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 11, 19-34.
15.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 291-321.
16.
CudeckR. (2001). Cronbach’s alpha on two-item scales. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(1-2), 55-55.
17.
DavisP. S.HarvestonP. D. (1999). In the founder’s shadow: Conflict in the family firm. Family Business Review, 12, 311-323.
18.
Deloitte & Touche Centre for Tax Education and Research. (1999). Are Canadian family businesses an endangered species: The first success readiness study of Canadian family-owned business (Survey conducted by Deloitte & Touche Centre for Tax Education and Research at the University of Waterloo). Retrieved from http://accounting.uwaterloo.ca/mtax/FamBusSurvey%201999.pdf
19.
De MassisA.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2008). Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Business Review, 21, 183-199.
20.
DunnB. (1999). The family factor: The impact of family relationship dynamics on business-owing families during transitions. Family Business Review, 12, 41-60.
21.
DyckB.MauwsM.StarkeF. A.MischkeG. A. (2002). Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, timing, technique, and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 143-162.
22.
EisenhardtK. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 4, 532-550.
23.
FlynnF. J. (2005). Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 737-750.
24.
FriedkinN. E. (2004). Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 409-425
25.
GellerD.BambergerP. (2009). Bringing avoidance and anxiety to the job: Attachment style and instrumental behaviour among coworkers. Human Relations, 62, 1803-1827.
26.
GildingM. (2000). Family business and family change: Individual autonomy, democratization, and the new family business institutionsFamily Business Review, 13, 239-249.
27.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 653-707.
28.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.Tákacs HaynesK.Nuňez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socio-emotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
29.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1-25.
30.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM.MacMillanI. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective on family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451-465.
31.
HandlerW. C. (1989). Managing the family firm succession process: The next generation family member’s experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
32.
HandlerW. C. (1994). Succession in family businesses: A review of the research. Family Business Review, 7, 133-157.
33.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1990). Love and work: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 270-280.
34.
HigginsonN. (2010). Preparing the next generation for the family business: Relational factors and knowledge transfer in mother-to-daughter succession. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 4, 1-18.
35.
IbarraH. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764-791.
36.
JonesC.VolpeE. H. (2011). Organizational identification: Extending our understanding of social identities through social networks. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 413-434.
37.
JöreskogK. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In GoldebergerA. S.DuncanO. D. (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 85-112). New York, NY: Academic Press.
38.
KatzD.KahnR. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
39.
KorsgaardM. A.SchweigerD. M.SapienzaH. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 60-84.
40.
KreinerG. K.AshforthB. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 1-27.
41.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
42.
MazzolaP.MarchisioG.AstrachanJ. (2008). Strategic planning in family business: A powerful developmental tool for the next generation. Family Business Review, 21, 239-258.
43.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1, 61-90.
44.
MikulincerM.ShaverP.R. (2005). Attachment theory and emotions in close relationships: Exploring the attachment-related dynamics of emotional reactions to relational events. Personal Relationships, 12, 149-168.
45.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
47.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
48.
NicholsonN.BjörnbergÅ (2007). Ready, willing and able? The next generation in family business. London: The Institute for Family Business.
49.
NicholsonN.BjörnbergÅ (2008). The shape of things to come—Emotional ownership and the next generation. In TapiesJ.WardJ., Family values and value creation. The fostering of enduring values within family-owned businesses (pp. 29-52). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
O’ReilyC.ChatmanJ. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492-499.
51.
PearsonA. W.CarrJ. C.ShawJ. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 32, 949-969.
52.
PerriconeP. J.EarleJ. R.TaplinI. M. (2001). Patterns of succession and continuity in family-owned businesses: study of an ethnic community. Family Business Review,
14, 105-121.
53.
PierceJ. L.KostovaT.DirksJ. L. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26, 298-310.
54.
PrattM. G. (1998). To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. In WhettenD. A.GodfreyP. C. (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Developing theory through conversations (pp. 171-207). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
55.
RichardsD. A.SchatA. C. H. (2011). Attachment at (Not to) work: Applying attachment theory to explain individual behaviour in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 169-182.
56.
RikettaM. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior,66, 358-384.
57.
RikettaM.Van DickR. (2005). Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 490-510.
58.
SharmaP. (1997). Determinants of the satisfaction of the primary stakeholders with the succession process in family firms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
59.
SharmaP. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17, 1-36.
60.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2003). Succession planning as planned behavior: Some empirical results. Family Business Review, 16, 1-15.
61.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.PabloA. L.ChuaJ. H. (2001). Determinants of initial satisfaction with the succession process in family firms: A conceptual model. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 25, 17-35.
62.
SharmaP.IrvingG. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: Antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 29, 13-33.
63.
SharmaP.RaoS. A. (2000). Successor attributes in Indian and Canadian family firms: A comparative study. Family Business Review, 13, 313-330.
64.
SlussD. M.AshforthB. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32, 9-32.
65.
SteierL. (2001). Next-generation entrepreneurs and succession: An exploratory study of modes and means of managing social capital. Family Business Review, 14, 259-276.
66.
TajfelH. (Ed.). (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
67.
TurnerJ. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In TajfelH. (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
68.
TurnerJ. C. (1984). Social identification and psychological group formation. In TajfelH. (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology and inter-group relations (Vol. 2, pp. 518-538). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
69.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2002). Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves?Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 89, 813-838.
70.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361.
71.
Van der HeydenL.BlondelC.CarlockR. S. (2005). Fair process: Striving for justice in family business. Family Business Review, 28, 1-21.
72.
WardJ. L.CarlockR. S. (2001). Strategic planning for the family business. Parallel planning to unify the family and business. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
73.
WestonR.GoreP. A.ChanF.CatalanoD. (2008). An introduction to using structural equation models in rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53, 340-356.
74.
YinR. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
