Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Drawing on boundary and identity theories, we examine how individuals manage boundaries in family businesses. Using an inductive, qualitative approach based on interviews of 44 individuals in four family businesses, we find organizational members use 13 identity work tactics, collectively labeled social boundary management, to create and manage boundaries for both individual and organizational identities. We illustrate how individuals use identity work tactics to integrate and segment themselves and others between the domains of family and business. Our findings have implications for family business research, boundary theory, and identity theory.

Keywords

family business boundary theory organizational identity identity work identity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albert

Whetten

D. A.

(1985). Organizational identity. In Staw

B. M.

Cummings

L. L.

(Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 251-284). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Alvesson

Willmott

(2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 619-644.

Arregle

J. L.

Hitt

M. A.

Sirmon

D. G.

Very

(2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 73-95.

Ashforth

B. E.

Kreiner

G. E.

Clark

M. A.

Fugate

(2007). Normalizing dirty work: Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 149-174.

Ashforth

B. E.

Kreiner

G. E.

Fugate

(2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472-491.

Ashforth

B. E.

Mael

(1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.

Berger

Luckmann

(1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Bryman

Burgess

(1994). Analyzing qualitative data. London, England: Routledge.

Burke

P. J.

(1980). The self: Measurement implications from a symbolic interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18-29.

10.

Charmaz

(2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

Corley

K. G.

Gioia

D. A.

(2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administration Science Quarterly, 49, 173-208.

12.

Davis

P. D.

Stern

(1981). Adaptation, survival, and growth of the family business: An integrated systems perspective. Human Relations, 34, 207-224.

13.

Distelberg

Blow

(2011). Differentiating value orientations and unity in values as predictors of varying FB system processes. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2, 207-219.

14.

Dutton

J. E.

Dukerich

J. M.

Harquail

C. V.

(1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.

15.

Edwards

J. R.

Rothbard

N. P.

(2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25, 178-199.

16.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

Graebner

M. E.

(2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25-32.

17.

Gephart

R. P.

(2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 454-462.

18.

Gersick

K. E.

Lansberg

Desjardins

Dunn

(1999). Stages and transitions: Managing change in the family business. Family Business Review, 12, 287-297.

19.

Gioia

D. A.

Chittipeddi

(1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433-448.

20.

Gioia

D. A.

Schultz

Corley

K. G.

(2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25, 63-81.

21.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

22.

Glaser

B.G.

Strauss

A.L.

(1998). Grounded theory: Stratien qualitativer Forschung. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.

23.

Glynn

M. A.

(2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11, 285-300.

24.

Goffman

(1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

25.

Gomez-Mejia

L. R.

Larraza-Kintana

Makri

(2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 226-237.

26.

Habbershon

T. G.

Williams

MacMillan

I. C.

(2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451-465.

27.

Handler

W. C.

(1994). Succession in family business: A review of the research. Family Business Review, 7, 133-157.

28.

Hatch

Schultz

(2002). The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations, 55, 989-1018.

29.

Haynie

J. M.

Shepherd

D. A.

(2009). A measure of adaptive cognition for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 33, 695-714.

30.

Hogg

M. A.

Terry

D. J.

White

K. M.

(1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 255-269.

31.

Kreiner

G. E.

(2006). Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 485-507.

32.

Kreiner

G. E.

Hollensbe

E. C.

Sheep

M. L.

(2006a). On the edge of identity: Boundary dynamics at the interface of individual and organizational identities. Human Relations, 59, 1315-1341.

33.

Kreiner

G. E.

Hollensbe

E. C.

Sheep

M. L.

(2006b). Where is the “me” among the “we”? Identity work and the search for optimal balance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1031-1057.

34.

Kreiner

G. E.

Hollensbe

E. C.

Sheep

M. L.

(2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 704-730.

35.

Kunda

(1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

36.

Lamont

Molnár

(2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 167-195.

37.

Lansberg

I. S.

(1988). The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review, 1, 119-143.

38.

Lansberg

I. S.

Astrachan

J. H.

(1994). Influence of family relationships on succession planning and training: The importance of mediating factors. Family Business Review, 7, 39-59.

39.

Lee

K. S.

Lim

G. H.

Lim

W. S.

(2003). Family business succession: Appropriation risk and choice of successor. Academy of Management Review, 28, 657-666.

40.

Levinson

(1971). Conflicts that plague the family business. Harvard Business Review, 49, 90-98.

41.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

42.

Locke

(2001). Grounded theory in management research. London, England: Sage.

43.

Micelotta

E. R.

Raynard

(2011). Concealing or revealing the family? Corporate brand identity strategies of family firms. Family Business Review, 24, 197-216.

44.

Miller

Steier

Le Breton-Miller

(2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 513-531.

45.

Morgan

Smircich

(1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5, 491-500.

46.

Nippert-Eng

C. E.

(1996). Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

47.

Olson

P. D.

Zuiker

V. S.

Danes

S. M.

Stafford

Heck

Duncan

(2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 639-666.

48.

Patton

M. Q.

(2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

49.

Pearson

A. W.

Carr

J. C.

Shaw

J. C.

(2008). Toward a theory of famliness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 949-969.

50.

Poza

E. J.

(2004). Family business. Mason, OH: Thompson, South-Western.

51.

Pratt

M. G.

Foreman

P. O.

(2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25, 18-42.

52.

Pratt

M. G.

Rafaeli

(1997). Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 862-898.

53.

Rau

B. L.

Hyland

M. M.

(2002). Role conflict and flexible work arrangements: The effects on applicant attraction. Personnel Psychology, 55, 111-136.

54.

Rothbard

N. P.

Phillips

K. W.

Dumas

T. L.

(2005). Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organization Science, 16, 243-258.

55.

Schulze

Lubatkin

Dino

Buchholtz

(2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.

56.

Sharma

(2008). Familiness: Capital stocks and flows between family and business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 971-977.

57.

Shepherd

Haynie

J. M.

(2009a). Birds of a feather don’t always flock together: Identity management in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 316-337.

58.

Shepherd

Haynie

J. M.

(2009b). Family business, identity conflict, and an expedited entrepreneurial process: A process of resolving identity conflict. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1245-1264.

59.

Sluss

D. M.

Ashforth

B. E.

(2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32, 9-32.

60.

Smith

Knapp

Barr

Stevens

Cannatelli

(2010). Social enterprises and the timing of conception: Organizational identity tension, management and marketing. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 22, 108-134.

61.

Snow

D. A.

Anderson

(1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1336-1371.

62.

Strauss

Corbin

(1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

63.

Stryker

(1968). Identity salience and role performance: The importance of symbolic Interaction Theory for Family Research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 558-564.

64.

Stryker

(1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Palo Alto, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

65.

Sundaramurthy

Kreiner

G. E.

(2008). Governing by managing identity boundaries: The case of family businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 391-591.

66.

Swartz

(1989). The challenges of multidisciplinary consulting to family-owned businesses. Family Business Review, 9, 329-339.

67.

Tagiuri

Davis

(1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9, 199-209.

68.

Turner

J. C.

(1978). Social comparison, similarity and in-group favouritism. In Tajfel

(Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 235-250). London, England: Academic Press.

69.

Van Maanen

(1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 539-550.

70.

Weick

K. E.

(1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

71.

Zellweger

T. M.

Eddleston

K. A.

Kellermanns

F. W.

(2010). Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1, 54-63.

72.

Zody

Sprenkle

MacDermid

Schrank

(2006). Boundaries and the functioning of family and business systems. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 185-206.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB