This article, drawing especially but not exclusively on Bourdieu’s work on practice and its relationships with habitus, capital, and field, argues for a perspective on policy, as informed by and as practice, and applies it across all elements of the policy cycle. It is argued that a practice perspective captures well the economies of power in policy in its various contexts. A conception of policy as practice also provides analytical resources to account for the dynamic nature of the production and movement of policy ideas and their resemiotization, as they are pulled into and used in, and for, education policy.
AdieL. (2008). The hegemonic positioning of “Smart State” policy. Journal of Education Policy, 23, 251-264.
2.
BallS. (1994). Education reform. A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
3.
BernsteinB. (2001). From pedagogies to knowledges. In MoraisA.NevesI.DaviesB.DanielsH. (Eds.), Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contributions of Basil Bernstein to research (pp. 363-368). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
BlackmoreJ. (2010). Policy, practice and purpose in the field of education: A critical review. Critical Studies in Education, 51(10), 101-111.
6.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
8.
BourdieuP. (1990a). The logic of practice. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
9.
BourdieuP. (1990b). In other words. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
BourdieuP. (1999). The social conditions of the international circulation of ideas. In ShustermanR. (Ed.), Bourdieu: A critical reader (pp. 220-229). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
12.
BourdieuP. (2003). Firing back: Against the tyranny of the market. London, UK: Verso.
13.
BourdieuP.WacquantL. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
14.
BoweR.BallS. J. (with GoldA.). (1992). Reforming education and changing schools: Case studies in policy sociology. London, UK: Routledge.
15.
ChouliarakiL.FaircloughN. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
16.
ConnellR. W. (1983). Which way is up? Essays on class, sex, and culture. London, UK: Allen and Unwin.
17.
ConnellR. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
CrossleyN. (2001). The social body: Habit, identity and desire. London, UK: SAGE.
19.
DebrayR. (2000). Transmitting culture. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
20.
DelpitL. (2006). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press.
21.
EastonD. (1953). The political system. New York, NY: Knopf.
22.
FaircloughN. (2003). Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Routledge.
23.
FaircloughN. (2009). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In WodakR.MeyerM. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 162-186). London, UK: SAGE.
24.
GrenfellM. (2008). Postscript. Methodological principles. In GrenfellM. (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu. Key concepts (pp. 219-227). Stocksfield, UK: Acumen.
25.
GrenfellM. (2010). Being critical: The practical logic of Bourdieu’s metanoia. Critical Studies in Education, 5(11), 85-99.
26.
HarveyD. (1996). Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
27.
HarveyD. (2007). The Kantian roots of Foucault’s dilemmas. In CramptonJ. W.EldenS. (Eds.), Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography (pp. 54-64). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
28.
IedemaR. A. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29-57.
29.
KohA. (2009). The visualization of education policy: A videological analysis of learning journeys. Journal of Education Policy, 24, 283-315.
LefebvreH. (1982). Twelve theses on logic and dialectic. In EldenS.LebasE.KofmanE. (Eds.), Henri Lefebvre key writings (pp. 57-64). London, UK: Continuum. (Reprinted from Logique formelle, logique dialectique, 3rd ed., Preface, by H. Lefebvre, 1982, Paris, France: Terrains Editions Sociales).
32.
LemkeJ. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 273-290.
33.
LevinsonB.SuttonM.WinsteadT. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23, 767-795.
34.
LingardB. (2009). Researching education policy in a globalized world: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 108, 226-246.
35.
LingardR.GarrickB. (1997). Producing and practising social justice policy in education: A policy trajectory study from Queensland, Australia. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 7, 157-179.
36.
LingardB.RawolleS. (2004). Mediatizing educational policy: The journalistic field, science policy, and cross-field effects. Journal of Education Policy, 19, 361-380.
37.
LingardB.HayesD.MillsM.ChristieP. (2003). Leading learning: Making hope practical in schools. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
38.
LingardB.RawolleS.TaylorS. (2005). Globalizing policy sociology in education: Working with Bourdieu. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 759-777.
39.
LingardB.OzgaJ. (2007). Reading education policy and politics. In LingardR.OzgaJ. (Eds.), The Routledgefalmer reader in education policy and politics (pp. 1-8). London, UK: Routledge.
40.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
41.
LukesS. (2004). Power: A radical view. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
McMeekinA.SouthertonD. (2007). Innovation and final consumption: Social practices, instituted modes of provision and intermediation (CRIC Discussion Paper No. 79). Manchester, UK: Centre for research on innovation and consumption, University of Manchester.
43.
McNayL. (2004). Agency and experience: Gender as a lived experience. In AdkinsL.SkeggsB. (Eds.), Feminism after Bourdieu (pp. 175-190). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
44.
MillerD. (2005). Materiality: An introduction. In MillerD. (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 1-50). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
45.
NicoliniD.GherardiS.YanowD. (Eds). (2003). Introduction: Toward a practice-based view of knowing and learning in organizations. In NicoliniD.GherardiS.YanowD. (Eds), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 3-31). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
46.
RawolleS. (2005). Cross-field effects and temporary social fields: A case study of the mediatization of recent Australian knowledge economy policies. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 705-724.
47.
RawolleS. (2010). Practice chains of production and consumption: Mediatised practices across social fields. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(1), 121-135.
48.
RawolleS.LingardB. (2008). The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and researching education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 23, 729-741.
49.
ReckwitzA. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243-263.
50.
SandbergJ.Dall’AlbaG. (2009) Returning to Practice Anew: A Life-World Perspective. Organization Studies30, 1349–1368.
51.
SchatzkiT. (1996). Social practices. A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
52.
SteinS. J. (2004). The culture of education policy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
53.
SuchmanL. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
54.
TaylorS. (2005). Researching educational policy and change in “new times”: Using critical discourse analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 19, 433-451.
55.
TaylorS.SinghP. (2005). The logic of equity practice in Queensland state education-2010. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 725-740.
56.
ThomasS. (2008). Leading for quality: Questions about quality and leadership in Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 23, 323-334.
57.
WacquantL. (1989). Towards a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 26-63.
58.
WardeA. (2004). Practice and field; revising Bourdieusian concepts (CRIC Discussion Paper No. 65). Manchester, UK: Centre for research on innovation and consumption, University of Manchester.
59.
WardeA. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 131-153.
60.
WilliamsR. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
