This case study of a single host city documents the complexity of the local response to displaced survivors of Hurricane Katrina by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and faith-based organizations (FBOs). Although additional disaster-related funding provided needed case management and financial services, it also added complexity to the service delivery system. Furthermore, changes in the federal disaster and income maintenance programs to address the crisis created an unstable service environment that was challenging for both survivors and service providers to navigate. NGOs and FBOs proved to be highly motivated, flexible, and creative. However, the response overall was marked by limited resources, equity, accountability, and coordination, illustrating some of the weaknesses of devolution and the increasing reliance on NGOs to provide basic services.
American Red Cross. (2006). From challenge to action: American Red Cross actions to improve and enhance its disaster response and related capabilities for the 2006 hurricane season and beyond. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://www.redcross.org/static/file_cont5448_lang0_2006.pdf
2.
Bell, H. ( 2008). Case management with displaced survivors of hurricane Katrina: A case study of one host community. Journal of Social Service Research, 34(3), 15-27.
3.
Coppola, S. ( 2005, November 24). Just like home; Well, almost. Sheriff’s office serves evacuees. AustinAmerican-Statesman: News, p. A1. Retrieved January 2006 from Lexis-Nexis database.
4.
Dewan, S., & Strom, S. ( 2007, August 10). Red Cross faces criticism over aid program for hurricane victims. New York Times. Retrieved September 14, 2007, from http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0C13F73C5C0C738DDDA10894DF404482
5.
DiPerna, P. ( 2003). Media, charity, and philanthropy in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. The Century Foundation . Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://www.tcf.org/Publications/HomelandSecurity/diperna.pdf
6.
Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A., & Myles, J. ( 2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
Fremont-Smith, M., Boris, E.T., & Steuerle, C.E. (2006). Charities response to disasters: Expectations and realities. In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), After Katrina: Public expectation and charities’ response (pp. 1-4). Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://www.urban.org/publications/311331.html
8.
Goldman, K.K. ( 2006). Nonprofits and disaster: The experience of New York State on September 11, 2001. In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), After Katrina: Public expectation and charities’ response (pp. 19-22). Retrieved March 10, 2008, from the http://www.urban.org/publications/311331.html
9.
Government Accountability Office. (2002). September 11: Interim Report on the response of charities. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d021037.pdf .
10.
Government Accountability Office. (2005). Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Provision of Charitable Assistance. Retrieved October 22, 2009, from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06297t.pdf
11.
Government Accountability Office. (2008). Mass care in disasters: FEMA should update the Red Cross role in catastrophic events and more fully assess voluntary organizations’ mass care capabilities . Retrieved October 22, 2009, from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d081175t.pdf
12.
Government Accountability Office. (2009). Disaster assistance: Greater coordination and an evaluation of programs’ outcomes could improve disaster case management. Retrieved October 22, 2009, from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09561.pdf
13.
Hacker, J.S. ( 2002). The divided welfare state. New York : Cambridge University Press.
14.
Homeland Security Institute. (2006). Heralding unheard voices: The role of faith based organizations and nongovernmental organizations during disasters. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://www.homelandsecurity.org/hsireports/Herald_Unheard_Voices.pdf
15.
Housing Authority of the City of Austin. ( 2006). Available from http://www.hacanet.org/
16.
Jenner, E., Jenner, L.W., Silvestre, E., & Matthews-Sterling, M. (2008). Final evaluation of the United Methodist Committee on Relief Katrina Aid Today national case management consortium. New Orleans, LA: Policy and Research Group.
17.
Kapucu, N. ( 2007). Non-profit response to catastrophic disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management, 16, 551-561.
18.
Kulkarni, S., Bell, H., Beausoleil, J., Lein, L., & Angel, R. ( 2008). When the floods of compassion are not enough: A nation’s and a city’s response to the evacuees of Hurricane Katrina. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 78, 399-425.
19.
Lein, L., Angel, R., Bell, H., & Beausoleil, J. (in press). The state and civil society response to disaster: The challenge of coordination. Organization and Environment, 22 (4).
20.
Liscano, M. ( 2005, September 6). Donation drive halted for now; City, overwhelmed by contributions, says it needs time to sort; cash is still welcome. Austin American-Statesman: Metro/ State, p. B1. Retrieved January 2006 from Lexis-Nexis database.
21.
MacLaggan, C. ( 2006, March 6). Food stamp backlog affects 6,000 central Texans: Applications for food stamps sharply decline in Travis County. Austin American-Statesman. Retrieved March 25, 2006, from http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/03/6callcenters.html
22.
Moore, M.H. ( 2006). Disasters and the voluntary sector: Reflections on the social response to hurricane Katrina. In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), After Katrina: Public expectation and charities’ response (pp. 23-27). Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://www.urban.org/publications/311331.html
23.
Olasky, M. ( 2006). The politics of disaster: Katrina, big government, and a new strategy for future crises. Nashville, TN: W Publishing Group.
24.
Pierson, P. ( 1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Pierson, P. ( 2001). Coping with permanent austerity: Welfare state restructuring in affluent democracies. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state (pp. 410-456).Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
Renz, L., & Marino, L. ( 2004). Giving in the aftermath of September 11: Final update on the foundation and corporate response. The Foundation Center. Retrieved April 8, 2008, from http://foundationcenter.org/gainknowledge/research/pdf/9_11updt04.pdf;jsessionid=F2C34L1AWWN0JLAQBQ4CGXD5AAAACI2F
27.
Smith, S.R. ( 2006). Rebuilding social welfare services after Katrina: Challenges and opportunities. In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), After Katrina: Public expectation and charities’ response (pp. 5-10). Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://www.urban.org/publications/311331.html
28.
Steuerle, C.E. ( 2002). Managing charitable giving in the wake of disaster. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://www.urban.org/publications/310471.html
29.
Stough, L.M., & Sharp, A.N. ( 2008). An evaluation of the impact of the National Disability Rights Network (NDRN) participation in the Katrina Aid Today project. Retrieved October 22, 2009, from http://www.ndrn.org/KAT/eval.pdf
30.
U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security Democratic Staff. (n.d.). Trouble exposed: Katrina, Rita, and the Red Cross: A familiar history. Retrieved October 22, 2009, from http://hsc-democrats.house.gov/SiteDocuments/redcrossreport.pdf
31.
Winston, P., Golden, O., Finegold, K., Rueben, K., Turner, M.A., & Zuckerman, S. ( 2006). After Katrina: Federalism after Hurricane Katrina: How can social programs respond to a major disaster. Retrieved December 5, 2006, from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/311344_after_katrina.pdf
