The general aim of this article is to analyze the evolution of national fundraising campaigns for charitable causes in Spain. Qualitative and quantitative perspectives are combined to contextualize features specific to Spain while allowing for comparisons with the other large international emergency campaigns. Main conclusions of the research confirm the historical and continuing importance of the role played by the State while explaining the basic change in the national campaigns. That change embodied a transition from an oligopolistic model of deeply rooted institutions enjoying corporatist agreements with the State that facilitated them privileged access to charitable lotteries, to a model of increasing competition. According to that more modern model, new nonprofit organizations have grown in importance by tapping into emerging philanthropic markets, both through State-mediated mechanisms such as campaigns related to tax-designation schemes, and through direct competition for donations to international aid campaigns from both individual and corporate donors.
Asociación Española de Fundraising (AEF). (2010, March15). Crisis humanitaria Haiti. Informe breve de Captación de fondos. Internal report.
7.
AvdeyevaT.BurgetovaK.WelchI. D. (2006). To help or not to help? Factors that determined helping responses to Katrina Victims. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6(1), 159-173.
8.
BabooramM.MullanB. A.SharpeL. (2010). Children’s understandings of mediated health campaigns for childhood obesity. Nutrition and Food Science, 40, 289-298.
9.
BennettR.KottaszR. (2000). Emergency fund-raising for disaster relief. Disaster Prevention and Management, 9, 352-359.
10.
BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationship with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(April), 76-88.
11.
BrownP.MintyJ. (2006). Media coverage & charitable giving. After the 2004 Tsunami. The William Davidson Institute Working Paper, 855.
12.
CabraM. A.de LorenzoR. (2005). El Tercer Sector en España: ámbito, tamaño y perspectivas. Revista Española del Tercer Sector, 1(October-December), 95-134.
13.
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. (2011). Barómetro de Noviembre. Estudio 2.917.
14.
ClohesyW. (2003). Fund-raising and the articulation of common goods. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 128-140.
15.
Cruz Roja. (2005). El tsunami antes y después.
16.
Cruz Roja. (2011). Captación de fondos para Haití.
EpsteinK. (2006Spring). Crisis mentality. Why sudden emergencies attract more funds than do chronic conditions, and how nonprofit can change that. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 4(1), 48-56.
19.
FeenyS.ClarkeM. (2007). What determines Australia’s response to emergencies and natural disasters?Australian Economic Review, 40(1), 24-36.
20.
García DelgadoJ. L. (Eds.). (2004). Las cuentas de la economía social: el tercer sector en España. Madrid, Spain: Thomson Civitas.
21.
García DelgadoJ. L. (Eds.). (2010). Las cuentas de la economía social: magnitudes y financiación del tercer sector en España 2005. Madrid, Spain: Thomson Civitas.
22.
GarrettT. A. (2001). An international comparison and analysis of lotteries and the distribution of lottery expeditures. International Review of Applied Economics, 15, 213-227.
23.
GarvíaR. (1994). Corporativismo en el área del bienestar. El caso de la Organización Nacional de Ciegos. REIS, 66(April-June), 53-71.
24.
GiménezF. (2007). La financiación de la Iglesia Católica en España (pp. 24-30). Madrid, Spain: Editorial Edice.
25.
GinerS.PérezM. (1988). Sobre el origen, naturaleza y modalidades del corporatismo. In GinerS.PérezM. (Eds.), El corporatismo en España (pp. 15-66). Barcelona, Spain: Ariel.
26.
GoeringE.ConnorU. M.NagelhoutE.SteinbergR. (2011). Persuasion in fundraising letters: An interdisciplinary study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 228-246.
27.
HankinsonP. (2001). Brand orientation in the Top 500 fundraising charities in the UK. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10, 346-360.
KorfB. (2007). Antinomies of generosity. Moral geographies and post-tsunami aid in Southeast Asia. Geoforum, 38, 366-378.
30.
KotlerP.LeeN. (2008). Social Marketing: Influencing behaviors for good. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
LinzJ. J. (1998). Política e intereses a lo largo de un siglo en España, 1880-1980. In GinerS.PérezM. (Eds.), El corporatismo en España (pp. 67-123). Barcelona, Spain: Ariel.
32.
MarbánV.RodríguezG. (2008). Visión panorámica del tercer sector social en España: entorno, desarrollo, investigación y retos sociales. Revista Española del Tercer Sector, 9 (Special Issue), 13-40.
33.
Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales. (2005). Quién es quién. Las entidades de acción social beneficiarias de la asignación tributaria del 0,52% del IRPF, convocatoria 2004. Madrid, Spain.
34.
MohrL. A.WebbD. J.HarrisK. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behaviour. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45-72.
35.
NielsenA. E.ThomsenC. (2007). Reporting CSR—What and how to say it. Corporate Communications, 12(1), 25-40.
PedreiraJ. (2003). El régimen fiscal del sector no lucrativo y del mecenazgo. Madrid, Spain: Thomson Civitas.
38.
RamosF. (2008, September9-12). La Lotería Nacional en España, 1850-2000. Perfil histórico del consumidor de loterías. Paper presented at the IX Congreso de Historia Económica de España. Murcia, Spain.
39.
RamosF. (2010, June). Azar y fortuna en España: la Lotería Nacional, 1850-2000. Investigaciones de Historia Económica, 17, 149-185.
40.
Rey-GarcíaM. (2009). Spain. In WiepkingP. (Ed.), The State of giving research in Europe. Household donations to charitable organizations in twelve European countries (pp. 52-65). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pallas Publications (Amsterdam University Press).
41.
Rey-GarcíaM.AlvarezL. I. (2011). Foundations and social economy: Conceptual approaches and socio-economic relevance. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 73, 61-80.
Rey-GarciaM.Martin-CavannaJ.Alvarez-GonzalezL. I. (2012). Assessing and advancing foundation transparency: Corporate foundations as a case study. The Foundation Review, 4(3), 77-89.
44.
RobbinsK. C. (2006). The nonprofit sector in historical perspective: Traditions of philanthropy in the West. In SteinbergR.PowellW.-W. (Eds.). The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 13-31). New Haven, CT: Yale University.
45.
RodríguezJ. M. (2006). La economía de la Iglesia española: ¿miedo a la transparencia?Iglesia Viva, 228(October-December), 7-28.
46.
SargeantA.LeeS.JayE. (2009). Communicating the “Realities” of charity cost: An institute of fundraising initiative. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 333-342.
47.
SargeantA.FordJ. B.HudsonJ. (2008). Charity brand personality: The relationship with giving behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 468-491.
48.
SheikS. R.Beise-ZeeR. (2011). Corporate social responsibility or cause-related marketing? The role of cause specificity of CSR. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 27-39.
49.
SkarmeasD.ShabbirH. A. (2011). Relationship quality and giving behaviour in the UK fundraising sector. Exploring the antecedent roles of religiosity and self-construal. European Journal of Marketing, 45, 720-738.
50.
SmithS. R.GrønbjergK. A. (2006). Scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In SteinbergR.PowellW.-W. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 221-242). New Haven, CT: Yale University.
51.
SmithJ. A.BorgmannK. (2001). Foundations in Europe: The historical context. In SchlüterA.VolkerT.WalkenhorstP. (Eds.), Foundations in Europe (pp. 2-34). London, UK: Directory for Social Change.
52.
SteinbergR. (2006). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In SteinbergR.PowellW.-W. (Eds.). The nonprofit sector. A research handbook (pp. 117-139). New Haven, CT: Yale University.
53.
ThorntonJ. (2006). Nonprofit fund-raising in competitive donor markets. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 204-224.
54.
TurkerD. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 411-427.
55.
VaradarajanP. R.MenonA. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A co-alignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(July), 58-74.
56.
WalshG.HassanL. M.ShiuE.AndrewsJ. C.HastingsG. (2010). Segmentation in social marketing. Insights from the European Union’s multi-country, antismoking campaign. European Journal of Marketing, 14, 1140-1164.
57.
WiepkingP. (2008). For the love of mankind. A sociological study on charitable giving (Ph.D. Dissertation). Faculty of Social Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
58.
ZagefkaH.NoorM.BrownR.De MouraG. R.HopthrowT. (2011). Donating to disaster victims: Responses to natural and humanly caused events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 353-363.
