Scholars often draw on resource dependence theory and institutional theory to explain nonprofit behavior in light of resource constraints, but few studies include empirical indicators of environmental constraints. This study examines the degree to which variables in the state-level funding environment promote (or deter) revenue diversification for housing nonprofits. It uses a hierarchical linear model (HLM) to capture constraint at two levels: the funding environment at the state level and organizational-level factors. Analyzing data from 990 housing nonprofits in 26 states and public funding environment variables for each of those states from 2008 to 2010, we find that state funding has a negative impact on revenue diversification for housing nonprofits. By including empirical indicators of the level of constraint for specific funding sources, we add to the body of literature that questions normative nonprofit financial management and provide evidence nonprofit leaders can use to inform their resource development strategies.
BarleyS. R.TolbertP. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18, 93-117.
2.
BrassilM. M. (2010). The creation of a federal partnership: The role of states in affordable housing. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
3.
BrintS.KarabelJ. (1991). Institutional origins and transformations: The case of American community colleges. In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 337-360). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
4.
BrooksA. (2000). Public subsidies and charitable giving: Crowding out, crowding in, or both?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19, 451-464.
ChangC. F.TuckmanH. P. (1994). Revenue diversification among nonprofits. Voluntas, 5, 273-290.
8.
ChangC. F.TuckmanH. P. (2010). Income diversification. In SeamanB. A.YoungD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research on nonprofit economics and management (pp. 5-17). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
9.
ChikotoG. L.NeelyD. G. (2014). Building nonprofit financial capacity: The impact of revenue concentration and overhead costs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43, 570-588.
10.
DavisG. F.CobbJ. A. (2010). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In SchoonhovenC. B.DobbinF. (Eds.), Stanford’s organization theory renaissance, 1970–2000 (Research in the Sociology of Organizations) (Vol. 28, pp. 21-42). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
11.
DeephouseD. L.SuchmanM. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49-77). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
FischerR. L.WilskerA.YoungD. R. (2007). Exploring the revenue mix of nonprofit organizations—Does it relate to publicness? Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Research Paper Series No. 07-32. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1024484
FroelichK. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 246-268.
16.
FrumkinP.KeatingE. K. (2011). Diversification reconsidered: The risks and rewards of nonprofit revenue concentration. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2, 151-164.
17.
GraddyE. A.BosticR. W. (2009). The role of private agents in affordable housing policy [Special issue: State of Agents]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(Suppl. 1), i81-i99.
18.
GrønjbergK. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
HagerM. A.SearingE. A. M. (2014). 10 ways to kill your nonprofit. The Nonprofit Quarterly, 21(4), 66-72.
20.
HeinrichC. J. (2002). Outcome-based performance management in the public sector: Implications for government accountability and effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 62, 712-725.
KearnsK. P.BellD.DeemB.McShaneL. (2014). How nonprofit leaders evaluate funding sources: An exploratory study of nonprofit leaders. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43, 121-143.
27.
LevyD.ScullyM. (2007). The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: The strategic face of power in contested fields. Organization Studies, 28, 971-991.
28.
MitchellG. E. (2014). Strategic responses to resource dependence among transnational NGOs registered in the United States. Voluntas, 25, 67-91.
National Council of State Housing Agencies. (2010). State HFA factbook: 2008 NCSHA survey results. Washington, DC: Author.
31.
National Council of State Housing Agencies. (2011). State HFA factbook: 2009 NCSHA survey results. Washington, DC: Author.
32.
National Council of State Housing Agencies. (2012). State HFA factbook: 2010 NCSHA survey results. Washington, DC: Author.
33.
OktenC.WeisbrodB. A. (2000). Determinants of donations in private nonprofit markets. Journal of Public Economics, 75, 255-272.
34.
ParsonsT. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
35.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
36.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1978)
37.
RuefM.ScottW. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 877-904.
38.
SchwartzA. F. (2010). Housing policy in the United States (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
SeldenS. C.SowaJ. E. (2004). Testing a multi-dimensional model of organizational performance: Prospects and problems. Journal Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 395-416.
40.
SilvermanR. M. (2008). CBOs and affordable housing. National Civic Review, 2008, 26-31.
41.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
42.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). Federal aid to states for fiscal year 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
43.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Federal aid to states for fiscal year 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
44.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Federal aid to states for fiscal year 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
45.
VerbruggenS.ChristiaensJ.MilisK. (2011). Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations’ compliance with reporting standards?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 5-32.
