The study of nonprofit advocacy has evolved significantly over the past two decades, yet gaps still remain in our understanding of the processes and roles of nonprofit organizations in policymaking and policy change. In part, these gaps may be exacerbated by limitations in the methodologies and research designs used to examine advocacy, despite the growing scholarship base. To investigate this possibility, this article reports the findings of a systematic literature review of 264 scholarly articles that examine the antecedents, processes, and/or outcomes of nonprofit advocacy. The sampling method relies heavily on scholarship published in six leading nonprofit and public administration journals. Although theory suggests that nonprofit organizations have a vital role in facilitating policy processes, much of the advocacy research relies upon a limited form of research questions and methods. Findings also reveal a need for greater precision in describing data, design, and methods, and suggest a need for clearer, validated measures of both nonprofit advocacy efforts and the resulting outcomes. Finally, we suggest new areas for nonprofit advocacy research, including investigating new venues, different levels of analysis, employing emerging research methods, and examining advocacy over time.
Abdel-SamadM. (2017). Legislators’ need for civil society expertise: Tunisian Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Opportunity. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(3), 299–319.
2.
Almog-BarM.SchmidH. (2014). Advocacy activities of nonprofit human service organizations: A critical review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 11–35.
3.
AndrasikK.MeadJ. W. (2019). Know me before you speak for me: Substantive public representation among nonprofits. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(1), 34–58.
4.
ArvidsonM.JohanssonH.ScaramuzzinoR. (2018). Advocacy compromised: How financial, organizational and institutional factors shape advocacy strategies of civil society organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(4), 844–856.
5.
BalassianoK.ChandlerS. M. (2010). The emerging role of nonprofit associations in advocacy and public policy: Trends, issues, and prospects. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(5), 946–955.
6.
BassG. D.AbramsonA. J.DeweyE. (2014). Effective advocacy: Lessons for nonprofit leaders from research and practice. In PekkanenR. J.SmithS. R.TsujinakaY. (Eds.), Nonprofits and advocacy: Engaging community and government in an era of retrenchment (pp. 254–293). The Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
BassG. D.AronsD. F.GuinaneK.CarterM. F.ReesS. (2007). Seen but not heard: Strengthening nonprofit advocacy. The Aspen Institute.
8.
BaumgartnerF. R.JonesB. D. (2010). Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press.
9.
BloodgoodE.Tremblay-BoireJ. (2017). Does government funding depoliticize non-governmental organizations? Examining evidence from Europe. European Political Science Review, 9(3), 401–424.
10.
BrooksF. (2005). Resolving the dilemma between organizing and services: Los Angeles ACORN’s Welfare Advocacy. Social Work, 50(3), 262–270.
11.
BuffardiA. L.PekkanenR. J.SmithS. R. (2017). Proactive or protective? Dimensions of and advocacy activities associated with reported policy change by nonprofit organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(3), 1226–1248.
12.
CaseyJ. (2011). Understanding advocacy: A primer on the policy-making role of nonprofit organizations. Baruch College, City University of New York, Center for Nonprofit Strategy. https://goo.gl/oegXGG
13.
ChenK. K. (2018). Interorganizational advocacy among nonprofit organizations in strategic action fields: Exogenous shocks and local responses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(Suppl. 4), 97S–118S.
14.
ChildC. D.GrønbjergK. A. (2007). Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Their characteristics and activities. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 259–281.
15.
ChinJ. J. (2018). Service-providing nonprofits working in coalition to advocate for policy change. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1), 27–48.
16.
CiszekE. L. (2017). Activist strategic communication for social change: A transnational case study of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender activism. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 702–718.
17.
CooperH. M.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.). (2019). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
CooperH. M.PatallE. A.LindsayJ. L. (2008). Research synthesis and meta-analysis. In BickmanL.RogD. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of applied social research methods (2nd ed., pp. 344–370). SAGE.
19.
Cordero-GuzmanH.MartinN.Quiroz-BecerraV.TheodoreN. (2008). Voting with their feet nonprofit organizations and immigrant mobilization. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(4), 598–617.
20.
de BrelàzG.Aquino AlvesM. (2011). Deliberative democracy and advocacy: Lessons Brelàz from a comparative perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 28(2), 202–216.
21.
FyallR. (2016). The power of nonprofits: Mechanisms for nonprofit policy influence. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 938–948.
22.
FyallR.AllardS. W. (2017). Nonprofits and political activity: A joint consideration of the political activities, programs, and organizational characteristics of social service nonprofits. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(3), 275–300.
23.
FyallR.McGuireM. (2015). Advocating for policy change in nonprofit coalitions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1274–1291.
24.
GenS.WrightA. C. (2018). Strategies of policy advocacy organizations and their theoretical affinities: Evidence from Q-methodology. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 298–326.
25.
GoldkindL. (2015). Social media and social service: Are nonprofits plugged in to the digital age?Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(4), 380–396.
26.
GormleyW. T.Jr.CymrotH. (2006). The strategic choices of child advocacy groups. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 102–122.
27.
GrasseN.WardK. D.Miller-StevensK. (2021). To lobby or not to lobby? Examining the determinants of nonprofit organizations taking the IRS 501(h) election. Policy Studies Journal, 49(1), 242–267.
28.
GreenspanI. (2014). How can Bourdieu’s theory of capital benefit the understanding of advocacy NGOs? Theoretical framework and empirical illustration. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 99–120.
29.
GugertyM. K.PrakashA. (Eds.). (2010). Voluntary regulation of NGOs and nonprofits: An accountability club framework. Cambridge University Press.
30.
GuoC.SaxtonG. D. (2010). Voice-in, voice-out: Constituent participation and nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 1(1), Article 5.
31.
GuoC.SaxtonG. D. (2014). Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 57–79.
32.
GuoC.SaxtonG. D. (2018). Speaking and being heard: How nonprofit advocacy organizations gain attention on social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1), 5–26.
33.
GuoC.WebbN. J.AbzugR.PeckL. R. (2013). Religious affiliation, religious attendance, and participation in social change organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(1), 34–58.
34.
GuoC.ZhangZ. (2014). Understanding nonprofit advocacy in non-western settings: A framework and empirical evidence from Singapore. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(5), 1151–1174.
35.
GuptaA.BlumhardtH., & ATD Fourth World. (2018). Poverty, exclusion and child protection practice: The contribution of “the politics of recognition & respect.”European Journal of Social Work, 21(2), 247–259.
36.
HopkeJ. E.HestresL. E. (2018). Visualizing the Paris climate talks on Twitter: Media and climate stakeholder visual social media during COP21. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 2056305118782687.
37.
HusseyL. S. (2014). Political action versus personal action: Understanding social movements’ pursuit of change through nongovernmental channels. American Politics Research, 42(3), 409–440.
38.
ImperialM. T.PerryJ. L.KatulaM. C. (2007). Incorporating service learning into public affairs programs: Lessons from the literature. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13, 243–264.
39.
JohansenM.LeRouxK. (2013). Managerial networking in nonprofit organizations: The impact of networking on organizational and advocacy effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 355–363.
40.
JungT.KaufmannJ.HarrowJ. (2014). When funders do direct advocacy: An exploration of the United Kingdom’s Corston Independent Funders’ Coalition. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 36–56.
41.
KerlinJ. A.ReidE. J. (2010). The financing and programming of advocacy in complex nonprofit structures. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(5), 802–824.
42.
KimM. (2017). Characteristics of civically engaged nonprofit arts organizations: The results of a national survey. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(1), 175–198.
43.
KimM.MasonD. P. (2018). Representation and diversity, advocacy, and nonprofit arts organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1), 49–71.
44.
LaurettR.FerreiraJ. J. (2018). Strategy in nonprofit organisations: A systematic literature review and agenda for future research. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(5), 881–897.
45.
LeRouxK. (2009). The effects of descriptive representation on nonprofits’ civic intermediary roles: A test of the “racial mismatch” hypothesis in the social services sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(5), 741–760.
46.
LiH.LoC. W. H.TangS. Y. (2017). Nonprofit policy advocacy under authoritarianism. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 103–117.
47.
LibbyP.DeitrickL.ManoR. (2017). Exploring lobbying practices in Israel’s nonprofit advocacy organizations: An application of the Libby Lobbying Model. Administrative Sciences, 7(4), 37.
48.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.
49.
LittellJ. H.CorcoranJ.PillaiV. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford University Press.
50.
LuJ. (2018). Organizational antecedents of nonprofit engagement in policy advocacy: A meta-analytical review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(Suppl. 4), 177S–203S.
51.
MacIndoeH.BeatonE. (2019). Friends or foes? How managerial perceptions of the political opportunity structure shape nonprofit advocacy. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(1), 59–89.
52.
MacIndoeH.WhalenR. (2013). Specialists, generalists, and policy advocacy by charitable nonprofit organizations. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 40, 119–149.
53.
MasonD. P. (2015). Advocacy in nonprofit organizations: A leadership perspective. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 6(3), 297–324.
54.
McNuttJ. G.BolandK. M. (1999). Electronic advocacy by nonprofit organizations in social welfare policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 432–451.
55.
McNuttJ. G.MenonG. M. (2008). The rise of cyberactivism: Implications for the future of advocacy in the human services. Families in Society, 89(1), 33–38.
56.
MosleyJ. E. (2010). Organizational resources and environmental incentives: Understanding the policy advocacy involvement of human service nonprofits. Social Service Review, 84(1), 57–76.
57.
MosleyJ. E. (2012). Keeping the lights on: How government funding concerns drive the advocacy agendas of nonprofit homeless service providers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 841–866.
58.
MosleyJ. E. (2013). Recognizing new opportunities: Reconceptualizing policy advocacy in everyday organizational practice. Social Work, 58(3), 231–239.
59.
MosleyJ. E. (2014). Collaboration, public-private intermediary organizations, and the transformation of advocacy in the field of homeless services. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(3), 291–308.
60.
MosleyJ. E.GibsonK. (2017). Strategic use of evidence in state-level policymaking: Matching evidence type to legislative stage. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 697–719.
61.
NesbitR. (2017). Advocacy recruits: Demographic predictors of volunteering for advocacy-related organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28, 958–987.
62.
Nicholson-CrottyJ. (2007). Politics, policy, and the motivations for advocacy in nonprofit reproductive health and family planning providers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 5–21.
63.
Nicholson-CrottyJ. (2011). Does reported policy activity reduce contributions to nonprofit service providers? Nicholson-Crotty: Reduced contributions to nonprofit service providers. Policy Studies Journal, 39(4), 591–607.
64.
PacewiczJ. (2018). The regulatory road to reform: Bureaucratic activism, agency advocacy, and Medicaid expansion within the delegated welfare state. Politics & Society, 46(4), 571–601.
65.
PekkanenR. J.SmithS. R. (2014). Introduction: Nonprofit advocacy: Definitions and concepts. In PekkanenR. J.SmithS. R.TsujinakaY. (Eds.), Nonprofits and advocacy: Engaging community and government in an era of retrenchment (pp. 1–20). The Johns Hopkins University Press.
66.
PotlukaO.ŠpaM. (2017). Non-governmental organizations as partners: Obstacles in the EU cohesion policy?Ekonomický Časopis, 65(8), 715–736.
67.
PralleS. B. (2003). Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: The internationalization of Canadian forest advocacy. Journal of Public Policy, 23(3), 233–260.
68.
PrenticeC. R. (2018). Misreporting nonprofit lobbying engagement and expenses: Charitable regulation and managerial discretion. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 9(2), 20180018.
69.
RuggianoN.TaliaferroJ. D.DillonF. R.GrangerT.ScherJ. (2015). Identifying attributes of relationship management in nonprofit policy advocacy. Journal of Policy Practice, 14(3–4), 212–230.
70.
Sarmiento MellingerM. (2017). Mission and advocacy structure: A perspective from human service organizations. Journal of Policy Practice, 16(3), 292–309.
71.
SchmidH.BarM.NirelR. (2008). Advocacy activities in nonprofit human service organizations implications for policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(4), 581–602.
72.
ShierM. L.HandyF. (2016). Executive leadership and social innovation in direct-service nonprofits: Shaping the organizational culture to create social change. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 27(2), 111–130.
73.
ShierM. L.HandyF.JenningsC. (2019). Intraorganizational conditions supporting social innovations by human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(1), 173–193.
74.
SolowiejL. A.CollinsP. M.Jr. (2009). Counteractive lobbying in the US Supreme Court. American Politics Research, 37(4), 670–699.
75.
SuárezD. F.HustedK.CasasA. (2018). Community foundations as advocates: Social change discourse in the philanthropic sector. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 7(3), 206–232.
76.
SuárezD. F.LeeY. (2011). Participation and policy: Foundation support for community organizing and civic engagement in the United States. Public Management Review, 13(8), 1117–1138.
77.
TranfieldD.DenyerD.SmartP. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.
78.
WhitesellA. (2019). Interest groups and social media in the age of the Twitter president. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(1), 219–230.
79.
ZhangC. (2018). Nongovernmental organizations’ policy advocacy and government responsiveness in China. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4), 723–744.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
