Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

For decades, scholars have devoted attention to identifying the giving habits of charitable donors, yet the behaviors of midlevel donors have not been independently considered. This study examined midlevel donors’ approaches to charitable giving and the extent to which they give to effective organizations. Operationalized as giving between U.S.$2,000 and U.S.$20,000 annually, we analyzed descriptive statistics and multivariate probit models of 1,260 midlevel donors using a novel study. We found that respondents were least likely to engage in ad hoc giving and most likely to give to organizations due to personal connections or prior research. However, while caring about a cause or issue was consistently and positively associated with giving to organizations that respondents viewed as effective, efforts to understand the organization’s work and the broader causes or issues were not. Our results suggest that identifying midlevel donors’ chosen causes is the first of several steps to giving to effective organizations.

Keywords

nonprofit organizations fundraising philanthropy nonprofit development nonprofit effectiveness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alston

Eckel

Meer

Zhan

(2021). High-capacity donors’ preferences for charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(6), 1262–1273. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211003251

Anderson

(2018, October 23). Rebuilding retail relationships: 3 rules for winning the digital customer. Multichannel Merchant. https://multichannelmerchant.com/blog/rebuilding-retail-relationships-3-ules-for-winning-the-digital-customer/

Andrews

Bartczak

Brest

Shamash

Tantia

(2020). Community-based organizations and high-capacity donors: Relationships, perceptions, and behaviors. Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society, Community Wealth Partners, & ideas42. https://pacscenter.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/CBOS_and_donors.pdf

Ball

A. D.

Tasaki

L. H.

(1992). The role and measurement of attachment in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80055-1

Bartunek

J. M.

Rynes

S. L.

(2014). Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1181–1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314529160

Berman

J. Z.

Barasch

Levine

E. E.

Small

D. A.

(2018). Impediments to effective altruism: The role of subjective preferences in charitable giving. Psychological Science, 29(5), 834–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617747648

Bjälkebring

Västfjäll

Dickert

Slovic

(2016). Greater emotional gain from giving in older adults: Age-related positivity bias in charitable giving. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 846. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00846

Boenigk

Scherhag

(2014). Effects of donor priority strategy on relationship fundraising outcomes. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 24(3), 307–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21092

Brown

(2021, May 24). As donors return to old patterns of giving, here’s how to ensure nonprofits get the resources they need. The Chronicle of Philanthropy. https://www.philanthropy.com/article/as-donors-return-to-old-patterns-of-giving-heres-how-to-ensure-nonprofits-get-the-resources-they-need

10.

Brown

Halvorsen

(2020). The mid-level donor survey at a glance. Sylvia Brown Smart Donors. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4449938

11.

Burum

Nowak

M. A.

Hoffman

(2020). An evolutionary explanation for ineffective altruism. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(12), 1245–1257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00950-4

12.

Camber Collective. (2015). Money for good 2015. https://cambercollective.squarespace.com/moneyforgood

13.

Cappellari

Jenkins

S. P.

(2003). Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood. The Stata Journal, 3(3), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0300300305

14.

Caviola

Schubert

Nemirow

(2020). The many obstacles to effective giving. Judgement and Decision Making, 15(2), 159–172. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/jdmjournl/v_3a15_3ay_3a2020_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a159-172.htm

15.

Collins

Flannery

(2020). Gilded giving 2020: How wealth inequality distorts philanthropy and imperils democracy. Institute for Policy Studies. https://inequality.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Gilded-Giving-2020-July28-2020.pdf

16.

Crutchfield

L. R.

Grant

H. M.

(2012). Forces for good: The six practices of high-impact nonprofits (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

17.

DellaVigna

List

J. A.

Malmendier

(2012). Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr050

18.

Eva

Robin

Sendjaya

van Dierendonck

Liden

R. C.

(2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004

19.

Fundraising Effectiveness Project. (2021). Quarterly fundraising report: Year-to-date nonprofit sector trends 01/01/2020-12/31/2020. Association of Fundraising Professionals. https://afpglobal.org/fepreports

20.

Fundraising Effectiveness Project. (2022). Quarterly fundraising report: Year-to-date nonprofit sector trends 01/01/2021-12/31/2021. Association of Fundraising Professionals and GivingTuesday. https://afpglobal.org/fepreports

21.

General Electric Capital. (2013, July 12). GE Capital retail bank’s second annual shopper study outlines digital path to major purchases. https://www.ge.com/news/press-releases/ge-capital-retail-banks-second-annual-shopper-study-outlines-digital-path-major

22.

Geweke

(1988). Antithetic acceleration of Monte Carlo integration in Bayesian inference. Journal of Econometrics, 38(1–2), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(88)90027-9

23.

Halvorsen

Brown

(2021). In their own words: Small- and mid-level donors express their views on charitable giving. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3916288

24.

Handy

(2000). How we beg: The analysis of direct mail appeals. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(3), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000293005

25.

Herzog

(2018, September 25). Ever sent clothes, supplies or toys in response to a disaster? Here’s what probably happened to it. TED Ideas. https://ideas.ted.com/after-a-disaster-dont-send-toys-or-clothing-send-money-heres-why/

26.

Hornsby

A. N.

Love

B. C.

(2020). How decisions and the desire for coherency shape subjective preferences over time. Cognition, 200, 104244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104244

27.

Huck

Rasul

(2011). Matched fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.10.005

28.

Hung

Hager

M. A.

Tian

(2022). Do donors penalize nonprofits with higher non-program costs? A meta-analysis of donor overhead aversion. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221138260

29.

Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. (2021). The giving environment: Understanding pre-pandemic trends in charitable giving: Data on declining U.S. donor participation. https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/26290/giving-environment210727.pdf

30.

Johnson

(2020, November 19). Nurturing relationships today and for years to come. Nonprofit Quarterly. https://nonprofitquarterly.org/nurturing-relationships-today-and-for-years-to-come/

31.

Jones

J. M.

(2020). Percentage of Americans donating to charity at new low. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/310880/percentage-americans-donating-charity-new-low.aspx

32.

Liket

K. C.

Maas

(2015). Nonprofit organizational effectiveness: Analysis of best practices. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(2), 268–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013510064

33.

Lind

Visentini

Mäntylä

Del Missier

(2017). Choice-supportive misremembering: A new taxonomy and review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02062

34.

Lindsay

(2018, October 30). A “lost decade?” Not for America’s favorite charities that tap the affluent. The Chronicle of Philanthropy. https://www.philanthropy.com/interactives/americas-favorite-charities

35.

MacLaughlin

Perrotti

Thompson

Salmony

(2022). Charitable giving report: Using 2021 data to transform your strategy. Blackbaud Institute. https://institute.blackbaud.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/BBI_CGR_2022.pdf

36.

Mark

M. M.

Shotland

R. L.

(1983). Increasing charitable contributions: An experimental evaluation of the American Cancer Society’s recommended solicitation procedures. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 12(2), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976408301200203

37.

McConnaughey

Shtylla

(2020). Stepping off the sidelines: The unrealized potential of strategic ultra-high-net-worth philanthropy. Milken Institute Center for Strategic Philanthropy. https://milkeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/reports-pdf/MI_SteppingOfftheSidelines_Report_FINAL_1_0.pdf

38.

Miller

(2007). Paradigm prison, or in praise of atheoretic research. Strategic Organization, 5(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007077558

39.

National Center for Charitable Statistics. (2020). The nonprofit sector in brief 2019. Urban Institute. https://nccs.urban.org/publication/nonprofit-sector-brief-2019

40.

National Council of Nonprofits. (2019). Nonprofit impact matters: How America’s charitable nonprofits strengthen communities and improve lives. https://www.nonprofitimpactmatters.org/site/assets/files/1/nonprofit-impact-matters-sept-2019-1.pdf

41.

O’Donoghue

McGregor-Lowndes

Lyons

(2006). Policy lessons for strengthening nonprofits. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 41(4), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2006.tb00033.x

42.

Osili

U. O.

Ackerman

(2019). Economic effects on million dollar giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(2), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018800791

43.

Osili

U. O.

Clark

C. J.

Han

(2019). Heterogeneity and giving: Evidence from U.S. households before and after the Great Recession of 2008. American Behavioral Scientist, 63, 1841–1862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219850859

44.

Parker

Horowitz

Minkin

(2022). COVID-19 pandemic continues to reshape work in America. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2022/02/16/covid-19-pandemic-continues-to-reshape-work-in-america/

45.

Radley

Kennedy

(1995). Charitable giving by individuals: A study of attitudes and practice. Human Relations, 48(6), 685–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800605

46.

Reed

Carstensen

(2012). The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00339

47.

Rooney

P. M.

(2018). The growth in total household giving is camouflaging a decline in giving by small and medium donors: What can we do about it? Nonprofit Quarterly, 25(3), 44–49.

48.

Routhieaux

R. L.

(2015). Shared leadership and its implications for nonprofit leadership. The Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 5(3), 139–152.

49.

Salamon

L. M.

Newhouse

C. L.

(2020). The 2020 nonprofit employment report (Nonprofit Economic Bulletin No. 48). Center for Civil Society Studies, Johns Hopkins University. http://ccss.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2020/06/2020-Nonprofit-Employment-Report_FINAL_6.2020.pdf

50.

Sargeant

MacQuillin

(2020). Relationship fundraising 2.0: Lessons from social psychology. In Anheier

H. K.

Toepler

(Eds.), The Routledge companion to nonprofit management (1st ed., pp. 377–388). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

51.

Savikhin Samek

Sheremeta

R. M

. (2014). Recognizing contributors: An experiment on public goods. Experimental Economics, 17(4), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-013-9389-1

52.

Sea Change Strategies. (2021). The missing middle part III: A snapshot of middle donor fundraising late 2020 / early 2021. https://www.seachangestrategies.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Sea-Change-Strategies-Missing-Middle-Part-III.pdf

53.

Shapiro

B. P.

(1974). Marketing in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 3(3–4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976407400300301

54.

Smith

D. H.

Shen

(1996). Factors characterizing the most effective nonprofits managed by volunteers. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130060306

55.

Stern

S. N.

Zhou

(2018). Antithetic acceleration and estimation of unobserved heterogeneity parameters. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3297698

56.

Stiffman

Haynes

(2019, November 5). Giving to the 100 top charities is up 11%. The Chronicle of Philanthropy. https://www.philanthropy.com/article/giving-to-the-100-top-charities-is-up-11/

57.

Tian

Hung

Frumkin

(2020). Breaking the nonprofit starvation cycle? An experimental test. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.31.93

58.

Wallace

(2018, April 5). How to inspire midlevel donors to give more. The Chronicle of Philanthropy. https://www.philanthropy.com/article/How-to-Inspire-Midlevel-Donors/242980/

59.

Winston

B. E.

Patterson

(2006). An integrative definition of leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(2), 6–66.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.06 MB

0.00 MB