Organizational listening to solicit, consider, and incorporate information and inputs from diverse stakeholders is critical for tackling organizational and societal challenges. Yet, despite the potential benefits of organizational listening, researchers studying stakeholder engagement and communication have focused on how organizations speak to stakeholders while overlooking how organizations listen to stakeholders. Drawing on survey data from a purposive sample of 122 nonprofit organizations (NPOs) in the United States and 40 interviews among these organizations, we explored organizational leaders’ conceptualization of organizational listening, including what, why, to whom, and how NPOs listen. Results also suggested operational capacity was a key factor influencing organizational listening. This study builds on prior stakeholder research to suggest organizational listening as a more holistic approach to stakeholder engagement. The findings have important implications for the research and practice in organizational listening and improving diverse participation and representation in stakeholder engagement, particularly for NPOs and mission-driven organizations.
BenjaminL. M. (2021). Bringing beneficiaries more centrally into nonprofit management education and research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020918662
2.
BornerM.ZerfassA. (2018). The power of listening in corporate communications. In BowmanS.CrookesA.IhlenØ.RomentiS. (Eds.), Public relations and the power of creativity (Vol. 3, pp. 8–22). Emerald.
3.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2012). Thematic analysis. In CooperH.CamicP. M.LongD. L.PanterA. T.RindskopfD.SherK. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
4.
BryanT. K. (2019). Toward a contingency model for the relationship between capacity and effectiveness in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(4), 885–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018815617
5.
Burnside-LawryJ. (2012). Listening and participatory communication: A model to assess organization listening competency. International Journal of Listening, 26(2), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2012.678092
CurleyC.Levine DanielJ.WalkM.HarrisonN. (2021). Competition and collaboration in the nonprofit sector: Identifying the potential for cognitive dissonance. Administration & Society, 53(8), 1293–1311. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211005834
8.
DaudigeosT.RouletT.ValiorgueB. (2020). How scandals act as catalysts of fringe stakeholders’ contentious actions against multinational corporations. Business & Society, 59(3), 387–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503185756892
DimitriadisS.LeeM.RamarajanL.BattilanaJ. (2017). Blurring the boundaries: The interplay of gender and local communities in the commercialization of social ventures. Organization Science, 28(5), 819–839. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1144
11.
EadieD. C. (1997). Changing by design: A practical approach to leading innovation in nonprofit organizations. Jossey-Bass.
12.
EstellP.DavidsonE. (2019). Employee engagement, voice mechanisms, and enterprise social network sites (ESNS). In Proceedings of 52nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 2387–2396). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.288
13.
FaulkL.KimM.Derrick-MillsT.BorisE.TomaskoL.HakizimanaN.ChenT.KimM.NathL. (2021). Nonprofit trends and impacts 2021. The Urban Institute.
14.
FlynnJ.ValikowskiT.GranJ. (2008). Listening in the business context: Reviewing the state of the research. International Journal of Listening, 22(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904010802174800
15.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pittman.
16.
FuJ. S.CooperK. R.ShumateM. (2019). Use and affordances of ICTs in interorganizational collaboration. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918824041
17.
FultonB. R. (2018). Organizations and survey research: Implementing response enhancing strategies and conducting nonresponse analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(2), 240–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115626169
18.
GarnerJ. T.GarnerL. T. (2011). Volunteering an opinion: Organizational voice and volunteer retention in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010366181
19.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. John Wiley & Sons.
20.
GrunigJ. E. (2001). Two-way symmetrical public relations: Past, present, and future. In HeathR. L. (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 11–30). Sage.
21.
IhmJ. (2019). Communicating without nonprofit organizations on nonprofits’ social media: Stakeholders’ autonomous networks and three types of organizational ties. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2648–2670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819854806
22.
JacksonS. J.BaileyM.WellesB. F. (2020). HashtagActivism: Networks of race and gender justice. MIT Press.
23.
JacobsC.CoghlanD. (2005). Sound from silence: On listening in organizational learning. Human Relations, 58(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705050938
24.
JonesM.JallinojaP.PietiläI. (2021). Representing the “voice” of patients: How third sector organisations conceptualise and communicate experiential knowledge in health service development. VOLUNTAS, 32(3), 561–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00296-5
25.
KennedyM. T.FissP. C. (2009). Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among US hospitals. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 897–918. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.44633062
KimH.LeachR. (2020). The role of digitally-enabled employee voice in fostering positive change and affective commitment in centralized organizations. Communication Monographs, 87(4), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637551.2020.1745859
28.
KoschmannM. A. (2016). A communication perspective on organisational stakeholder relationships: Discursivity, relationality, and materiality. Communication Research and Practice, 2(3), 407–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1217383
29.
KoschmannM. A.KopczynskiJ. (2017). Stakeholder communication. In ScottC. R.LewisL.BarkerJ. R.KeytonJ.KuhnT.TurnerP. K. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication. John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc193
30.
LaiC.-H.FuJ. S. (2021). Humanitarian relief and development organizations’ stakeholder targeting communication on social media and beyond. VOLUNTAS, 32(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00209-6
31.
LewisL. K. (2011). Organizational change: Creating change through strategic communication. Wiley-Blackwell.
32.
LewisL. K. (2020). The power of strategic listening. Rowman & Littlefield.
33.
LovejoyK.SaxtonG. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
34.
MacnamaraJ. (2016). Organizational listening: The missing essential in public communication. Peter Lang Publishing.
MeyskensM.Robb-PostC.StampJ. A.CarsrudA. L.ReynoldsP. D. (2010). Social ventures from a resource-based perspective: An exploratory study assessing Ashoka fellows. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00389.x
37.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.WoodD. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Journal, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
38.
MooreM. H. (2000). Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit, and governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(Suppl. 1), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291S009
39.
NeillM. S.BowenS. A. (2021). Ethical listening to employees during a pandemic: New approaches, barriers and lessons. Journal of Communication Management, 25(3), 276–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-09-2020-0103
40.
OspinaS.DiazW.O’SullivanJ. F. (2002). Negotiating accountability: Managerial lessons from identity-based nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764002311001
41.
QinY. S.MenL. R. (2021). Why does listening matter inside the organization? The impact of internal listening on employee-organization relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 33(5), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2022.2034631
42.
RaeymaeckersP.Van PuyveldeS. (2021). Nonprofit advocacy coalitions in times of COVID-19: Brokerage, crowdfunding, and advocacy roles. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(6), 1304–1317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764021991675
43.
ReinikainenH.KariJ. T.Luoma-AhoV. (2020). Generation Z and organizational listening on social media. Media and Communication, 8(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2772
SaxtonG. D.GuoC. (2011). Accountability online: Understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009341086
46.
ShiY.JangH. S.KeyesL.DickeL. (2020). Nonprofit service continuity and responses in the pandemic: Disruptions, ambiguity, innovation, and challenges. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 874–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13254
47.
ShierM. L.HandyF.JenningsC. (2019). Intraorganizational conditions supporting social innovations by human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(1), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018797477
SommerfeldtE. J.YangA.TaylorM. (2019). Public relations channel “repertoires”: Exploring patterns of channel use in practice. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 101796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101796
50.
TaylorM. P. (2022). Can we chat . . . privately? Using Twitter chats to facilitate offline engagement for nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52, 745–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221111937
51.
TracyS. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley.
52.
Van PuyveldeS.CaersR.Du BoisC.JegersM. (2012). The governance of nonprofit organizations: Integrating agency theory with stakeholder and stewardship theories. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011409757
53.
XuW. W.SaxtonG. D. (2019). Does stakeholder engagement pay off on social media? A social capital perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018791267
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
