Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Many donors restrict their contributions to ensure that nonprofits deliver services that are aligned with their expectations. While restricted resources offer advantages, it may introduce inefficiencies within nonprofits. This concern prompts an important research question: Is there a relationship between having unrestricted resources and organizational efficiency? This study explores the connection between unrestricted resources and the efficiency of nonprofits, and investigates whether factors like organizational size, age, commercialization, and leverage influence this relationship. Using longitudinal data from 2010 to 2016 sourced from Habitat for Humanity in the United States, our results suggest a positive link between unrestricted resources and organizational efficiency. Moreover, the findings reveal that this positive association is stronger for small organizations than for larger ones, and stronger for organizations with lower leverage than for those with higher leverage. These findings align with resource dependence theory, suggesting that reducing donor influence and increasing managerial autonomy can improve organizational efficiency. They also underscore the importance of donor-nonprofit relationships based on mutual understanding and alignment of objectives.

Keywords

unrestricted resources organizational efficiency organizational age organizational size nonprofit commercialization leverage

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahn

Akinyemi

A. S.

Atiles

J. H.

Beamish

J. O.

Bruin

M. J.

Cook

C. C.

. . . Yust

B. L.

(2018). Introduction to Housing. University of Georgia Press.

Arrillaga

Buteau

Grundhoefer

(2025). Breaking the mold: The transformative effect of MacKenzie Scott’s big gifts. The Center for Effective Philanthropy. https://cep.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CEP_Breaking_the_Mold_FNL.pdf

Ayayi

A. G.

Wijesiri

(2018). Better with age? The relationship between longevity and efficiency dynamics of nonprofit microfinance institutions. Quality & Quantity, 52(5), 2331–2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0668-3

Barman

(2008). With strings attached: Nonprofits and the adoption of donor choice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(1), 39–56.

Berrett

Williams

Minkowitz

Lahoud

(2022). The iron triangle of affordable homeownership: Habitat for humanity affiliate strategies for balancing efficiency, effectiveness, and equity. The American Review of Public Administration, 52(8), 573–585.

Berrett

J. L.

(2022). Linking overhead expenses and nonprofit effectiveness: Evidence from Habitat for Humanity. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 32(4), 509–530.

Berrett

J. L.

Hung

(2024). Does revenue concentration really bring organizational efficiency? Evidence from Habitat for Humanity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(4), 974–996.

Berrett

J. L.

Sudweeks

(2023). Understanding nonprofit leaders’ perceptions of organizational efficiency. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 33(3), 491–510.

Berrone

Gelabert

Massa-Saluzzo

Rousseau

H. E.

(2016). Understanding community dynamics in the study of grand challenges: How nonprofits, institutional actors, and the community fabric interact to influence income inequality. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1940–1964.

10.

Buteau

Smith Arrillaga

(2023). Emerging impacts: The effects of MacKenzie Scott’s large, unrestricted gifts—Results from year two of a three-year study. Center for Effective Philanthropy. https://www.cep.org

11.

Cairns

Mills

Ridley

(2013). Thinking about. . . core funding. Institute for Voluntary Action Research (IVAR). https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/hr0kwvon17Feb2025.COI:20.500.12592/hr0kwv

12.

Calabrese

Grizzle

(2012). Debt, donors, and the decision to give. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting Financial Management, 24(2), 221–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-24-02-2012-B003

13.

Calabrese

T. D.

(2011). Testing competing capital structure theories of nonprofit organizations. Public Budgeting & Finance, 31(3), 119–143.

14.

Candid & Center for Disaster Philanthropy. (2022). Philanthropy and COVID-19: Examining two years of giving. https://www.issuelab.org/resources/40288/40288.pdf

15.

Carroll

D. A.

Stater

K. J.

(2009). Revenue diversification in nonprofit organizations: Does it lead to financial stability? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 947–966.

16.

Chang

C. F.

Tuckman

H. P.

(1994). Revenue diversification among non-profits. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 5(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354036

17.

Charles

(2017). Nonprofit arts organizations: Debt ratio does not influence donations—Interest expense ratio does. The American Review of Public Administration, 48, 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017724227

18.

Charles

Sloan

M. F.

Schubert

(2020). If someone else pays for overhead, do donors still care? American Review of Public Administration, 50(4–5), 415–427.

19.

Charnes

Cooper

W. W.

Rhodes

(1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

20.

Chikoto

G. L.

Neely

D. G.

(2014). Building nonprofit financial capacity: The impact of revenue concentration and overhead costs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(3), 570–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012474120

21.

Coupet

(2017). Strings attached? Linking historically Black colleges and Universities public revenue sources with efficiency. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2016.1254427

22.

Coupet

(2018). Exploring the link between government funding and efficiency in nonprofit colleges. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(1), 65–81.

23.

Coupet

Berrett

(2018). Toward a valid approach to nonprofit efficiency measurement. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(3), 299–320.

24.

Coupet

Berrett

Broussard

Johnson

(2021). Nonprofit benchmarking with data envelopment analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(3), 647–661.

25.

del Barrio-Tellado

M. J.

Herrero-Prieto

L. C.

Murray

. (2020). Audience success or art for art’s sake? Efficiency evaluation of dance companies in the United States. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(1), 129–152.

26.

Denison

D. V.

(2009). Which nonprofit organizations borrow? Public Budgeting & Finance, 29(3), 110–123.

27.

Ecer

Magro

Sarpça

(2017). The relationship between nonprofits’ revenue composition and their economic-financial efficiency. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(1), 141–155.

28.

Elbers

Arts

(2011). Keeping body and soul together: Southern NGOs’ strategic responses to donor constraints. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(4), 713–732.

29.

Frumkin

Keating

E. K.

(2011). Diversification reconsidered: The risks and rewards of revenue concentration. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2011.614630

30.

Glaeser

E. L.

Gyourko

Saks

(2005). Why is Manhattan so expensive? Regulation and the rise in housing prices. The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 331–369.

31.

Gonzalez-Torre

Lozano

Adenso-Díaz

(2017). Efficiency analysis of the European food banks: Some managerial results. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(2), 822–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9814-0

32.

Habitat for Humanity. (2024). Our mission, vision and principles. https://www.habitat.org/about/mission-and-vision

33.

Hager

M. A.

(2001). Financial vulnerability among arts organizations: A test of the Tuckman-Chang measures. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(2), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764001302010

34.

Hager

M. A.

(2018). Life cycles of nonprofit organizations. In: Farazmand

(Eds.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 3792–3798). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_2705

35.

Heinzel

Cormier

Reinsberg

(2023). Earmarked funding and the control–performance trade-off in International Development Organizations. International Organization, 77(2), 475–495.

36.

Henshaw

(2020). Understanding Insurgent Resilience (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://www.perlego.com/book/1629531/understanding-insurgent-resilience-organizational-structures-and-the-implications-for-counterinsurgency-pdf

37.

Hung

(2021). Restricted revenues and nonprofit service delivery: The roles of financial discretion. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(1), 136–150.

38.

Hung

Berrett

(2021). Service delivery under pressure: The effect of donor-imposed financial restrictions. Public Performance & Management Review, 44(3), 580–601.

39.

Hung

Berrett

(2023a). The effects of commercialization on nonprofit efficiency and the moderating roles of government funding and organizational size. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 33(4), 735–753.

40.

Hung

Berrett

(2023b). When are commercialized nonprofits less likely to offer free access? Evidence from the performing arts subsector. Public Performance & Management Review, 46(3), 644–665.

41.

Hung

Hager

M. A.

(2019). The impact of revenue diversification on nonprofit financial health: A meta-analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(1), 5–27.

42.

Hung

Hager

M. A.

(2020). Moderated commitment: Members’ decisions not to give to professional associations. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(4), 971–992.

43.

Hung

Wit

de Wiepking

(2023). Restricted / unrestricted funds (pp. 495–498). Edward Elgar Publishing Ebooks. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800880092.ch154

44.

Hunnik

de Wit

Wiepking

(2021). (In)equality through unrestricted grantmaking: Examining trust and power in the collaboration between the Dutch charity lotteries and their grantees. The Foundation Review, 13(2), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1563

45.

Jaskyte

(2013). Does size really matter? Organizational size and innovations in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 24(2), 229–247.

46.

Jensen

M. C.

Meckling

W. H.

(1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

47.

Kender-Jeziorska

(2019). Needle exchange programmes in Visegrad countries: A comparative case study of structural factors in effective service delivery. Harm Reduction Journal, 16(1), 54.

48.

King

Lewis

G. B.

(2017). Nonprofit pay in a competitive market: Wage penalty or premium? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(5), 1073–1091.

49.

Kishore

Geetha

Shivaprasad

S. P.

Chandra

S. R.

Jain

(2024). Discrepancy in efficiency scores due to sampling error in data envelopment analysis methodology: Evidence from the banking sector. F1000Research, 13, 890.

50.

Lampe

H. W.

Hilgers

(2015). Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), 1–21.

51.

Levine Daniel

Kim

. (2018). The scale of mission-embeddedness as a nonprofit revenue classification tool: Different earned revenue types, different performance effects. Administration & Society, 50(7), 947–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716647152

52.

Lippman

E. J.

(2016). Transparency and accountability for bequests: The case of Long Island College hospital. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 13(3), 28–35.

53.

Lin

Wang

(2019). Does a more diversified revenue structure lead to greater financial capacity and less vulnerability in nonprofit organizations? A bibliometric and meta-analysis. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30, 593–609.

54.

Luksetich

Hughes

P. N.

(1997). Efficiency of fund-raising activities: An application of data envelopment analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(1), 73–84.

55.

Mayer

W. J.

Wang

H. C.

Egginton

J. F.

Flint

H. S.

(2014). The impact of revenue diversification on expected revenue and volatility for nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2), 374–392.

56.

McDonald

(2009). Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(2), 792–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.039

57.

McGinnis Johnson

E. S.

(2016). Money talks or millennials walk: The effect of compensation on nonprofit millennial workers sector-switching intentions. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(3), 283–305.

58.

Mensah

Y. M.

Werner

(2003). Cost efficiency and financial flexibility in institutions of higher education. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(03)00036-X

59.

Miragaia

Brito

Ferreira

(2016). The role of stakeholders in the efficiency of nonprofit sports clubs. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 27(1), 113–134.

60.

Mitchell

G. E.

Calabrese

T. D.

(2019). Proverbs of nonprofit financial management. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(6), 649–661.

61.

Mitchell

G. E.

Calabrese

T. D.

(2023). The hidden cost of trustworthiness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(2), 304–326.

62.

Nissi

Giacalone

Cusatelli

(2019). The efficiency of the Italian judicial system: A two stage data envelopment analysis approach. Social Indicators Research, 146(1/2), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1892-5

63.

Özer

Ö.

Urrea

Villa

. (2024). To earmark or to nonearmark? The role of control, transparency, and warm-glow. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 26(2), 739–757.

64.

Papke

L. E.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 619–632.

65.

Papke

L. E.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2008). Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics, 145(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.05.009

66.

Park

S. E.

Mosley

(2017). Nonprofit growth and decline during economic uncertainty. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(5), 515–531.

67.

Pfeffer

Salancik

G. R.

(1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford Graduate School of Business.

68.

Ramalho

E. A.

Ramalho

J. J. S.

Henriques

P. D.

(2010). Fractional regression models for second stage DEA efficiency analyses. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(3), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0184-0

69.

Roh

C.-Y.

Jae Moon

Jung

(2010). Measuring performance of U.S. nonprofit hospitals. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576340102

70.

Ruggiero

(1996). On the measurement of technical efficiency in the public sector. European. Journal of Operational Research, 90(3), 553–565.

71.

Shaker

Wiepking

(2021, July 26). What is unrestricted funding? Two philanthropy experts explain. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/what-is-unrestricted-funding-two-philanthropy-experts-explain-164589

72.

Shon

Hamidullah

M. F.

McDougle

L. M.

(2019). Revenue structure and spending behavior in nonprofit organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(6), 662–674.

73.

Stasio

(2022, November 29). Why unrestricted funds are important for nonprofits. World Institute on Disability. https://wid.org/why-unrestricted-funds-are-important-for-nonprofits/

74.

Steinberg

(2006). Economic theory of nonprofit organizations. In Powell

W. W.

Steinberg

(Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 117–139). Yale University Press.

75.

Surysekar

Turner

Wheatley

(2015). On the association between donor imposed financial inflexibility and future donations to charitable organizations. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50900

76.

Texas A&M University. (n.d.). Fracreg—Fractional response regression. https://liberalarts.tamu.edu/sociology/wpcontent/uploads/sites/9/2021/07/stata_fracreg.pdf

77.

Wang

Balachandran

(2023). Inclusionary housing in the United States: Dynamics of local policy and outcomes in diverse markets. Housing Studies, 38(6), 1068–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2021.1929863

78.

Wiepking

de Wit

(2020). Unrestricted impact: Field note on a mixed-method project studying the effects of unrestricted funding on grantees’ organisational and project impact. International Review of Philanthropy and Social Investment, 1(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.47019/irpsi.2020/v1n1a11

79.

Wiepking

de Wit

(2024). Unrestricted funding and nonprofit capacities: Developing a conceptual model. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 34(4), 801–824.

80.

Yermack

(2017). Donor governance and financial management in prominent US art museums. Journal of Cultural Economics, 41(3), 215–235.

81.

Zillow. (2024). Housing Data—Zillow Research. Zillow Research. https://www.zillow.com/research/data/

Exploring the Dynamics: The Relationship Between Unrestricted Resources and Nonprofit Efficiency

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References