Assisted reproduction policies constitute a particularly interesting case for the study of child rights governance as the child here is an intended child. The child’s rights are in potential conflict not with the parental, but the reproductive rights of adults. The article aims to analyse the mobilisation of the best interests of the child principle as a rhetorical resource in Swedish assisted reproduction policies and to trace the limits of governance in the name of the rights of the child.
AreschougJ (2005) Parenthood and intellectual disability. Discourses on birth control and parents with intellectual disabilities 1967-2003. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research7(3–4): 155–175.
3.
Assisted Reproduction in the Nordic Countries (2006) A Comparative Study of Policies Regulation. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
4.
BaylisFMcLeodC (2014) Family-making: Contemporary Ethical Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BevirM (2011) Governance and governmentality after neoliberalism. Policy & Politics39(4): 457–471.
6.
BlythEBurrVFarrandA (2008) Welfare of the child assessments in assisted conception: A social constructionist perspective. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology26(1): 31–43.
7.
CohenIG (2011) Prohibiting anonymous sperm donation and the child welfare error. Hastings Center Report41(5): 13–14.
8.
Committee on the Rights of the Child (1994) Concluding observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: Norway. Report CRC/C/15/Add.23. Available at: http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/crc/NORWAY6.htm
CutasD (2018). The composition of the family. In: GheausACalderGDe WispelaereJ (eds) The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Childhood and Children. London: Taylor and Francis.
11.
DingwallREekelaarJMurrayT (2014). The Protection of Children. State Intervention and Family Life. 2nd ed.Aldershot: Avebury.
12.
EngeliIRothmayr AllisonC (2017) Governing new reproductive technologies across Western Europe. In LieMLykkeN (eds) Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives and Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 87–99.
13.
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) (2018) ART fact sheet 18February2018. https://www.eshre.eu/Press-Room/Resources (accessed 20 March 2018).
14.
FinlaysonA (2007) From beliefs to arguments: Interpretive methodology and rhetorical political analysis. British Journal of Politics and International Relations9: 545–563.
15.
FischerFGottweisH (2012) Introduction: The argumentative turn revisited. In: FischerFGottweisH (eds) The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press, pp. 1–27.
16.
GottweisH (2012) Political rhetoric and stem cell policy in the United States: Embodiments, scenographies, and emotions. In: FischerFGottweisH (eds) The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press, pp. 211–235.
17.
GrubeD (2016) Sticky words? Towards a theory of rhetorical path dependency. Australian Journal of Political Science51(3): 530–545.
18.
Gunnarsson PayneJKorolczukE (2016) Reproducing politics: The politicization of patients’ identities and assisted reproduction in Poland and Sweden. Sociology of Health and Illness38(7): 1074–1091.
19.
HeydD (1992) Genetics: Moral Issues in the Creation of People. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
20.
HolzscheiterA (2005) Discourse as capability: Non-state actors’ capital in global governance. Millennium: Journal of International Studies33(3): 723–746.
Jonsson MalmC (2011) Att plantera ett barn. Internationella adoptioner och assisterad befruktning i svensk reproduktionspolitik [Placing a child: International adoption and assisted reproductive technology in Swedish family policy]. PhD Thesis, University of Lund, Lund.
23.
KanckosL (2012) Barnets bästa i politikens främsta rum: Finlands riksdags debatt om assisterad befruktning. [The best interests of the child in the highest chamber of politics: The Finnish parliamentary debate on assisted reproduction]. PhD Thesis, Åbo Akademi University, Turku.
24.
KorenM (1995) A children’s ombudsman in Sweden. International Journal of Children’s Rights3: 101–118.
25.
LagerbergD (2014) Barnets bästa – absolut och relativt. Funderingar kring ett aktuellt exempel (assisterad befruktning) [The best interests of the child – absolute and relative: Speculations on a current example (assisted reproduction)]. In: CederborgA-CWarnling-NerepW (eds) Barnrätt. En antologi. [Children’s rights: An anthology]. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, pp. 238–256.
26.
LieMLykkeN (2017) Assisted Reproduction across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions. New York: Routledge.
27.
LiljestrandP (1995) Legitimate state and illegitimate parents: Donor insemination politics in Sweden. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society2(3): 270–304.
28.
LindJ (2008) The best interest of the child as an argument in assessments of parent potential in Sweden. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family22(1): 1–21.
29.
LundqvistÅ (2007) Familjen i den svenska modellen. [The family in the Swedish model]. Umeå: Boréa.
30.
NehlinA (2009) Exporting Visions and Saving Children: The Swedish Save the Children Fund. PhD Thesis, Linköping University, Linköping.
31.
NordqvistP (2006) Önskat och oönskat föräldraskap. Kön och sexualitet i svensk lagstiftningshistoria om insemination [Desired and undesired parenthood: Gender and sexuality in Swedish legislative history on insemination]. Lambda Nordica2(1–2): 30–46.
32.
PenningsG (2011) Evaluating the welfare of the child in same-sex families. Human Reproduction26(7): 1609–1615.
33.
QuigleyM (2010) A right to reproduce?Bioethics24(8): 403–411.
34.
SandinB (2012) Children and the Swedish Welfare State. From Different to Similar. In: FassPGrossbergM (eds) Reinventing Childhood After World War II. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 110–138.
35.
ShanleyML (2001) Making Babies, Making Families: What Matters Most in an Age of Reproductive Technologies, Surrogacy, Adoption, and Same-sex and Unwed Parents’ Rights. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
36.
SingerA (2006) Mater semper certa est’?Juridisk Tidskrift18(2): 424–431.
37.
SköldJOsvaldsson CromdalK (forthcoming) Barnrättspolitik och vuxensyn. Stabilitet och förändring i BRIS utåtriktade arbete [Child rights politics and adult perspectives: Stability and change in The Rights of the Child in Society’s external work]. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift.
38.
StollJ (2013) Surrogacy Arrangements and Legal Parenthood: Swedish Law in a Comparative Context. PhD Thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
39.
Tinnerholm LjungbergH (2015) Omöjliga familjen. Ideologi och fantasi i svensk reproduktionspolitik [The impossible family: Ideology and fantasy in Swedish reproductive politics]. PhD Thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
40.
Van EemerenFH (2010) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing.
41.
Van EemerenFHHoutlosserP (2009) ‘Strategic maneuvering: Examining argumentation in context’. In: van EemerenFH (ed.) Examining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen Studies on Strategic Maneuvering. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing, pp. 1–24.
42.
United Nations (1989) The UN Convention of the Rights of the Child. Geneva: United Nations.
43.
WodakR (2015) Critical discourse analysis, discourse-historical approach. In: TracyK (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
44.
SFS 1984:1140 [Act on insemination]
45.
SFS 1988:711 [Act on conception outside the body]
46.
SFS 2018:1283 [revision of act 2006:351 on genetic integrity]
47.
SOU 1983:42Barn genom insemination [Children through insemination]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
48.
SOU 1985:5Barn genom befruktning utanför kroppen [Children through conception outside the body]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
49.
SOU 2014:29Assisterad befruktning för ensamstående kvinnor [Assisted reproduction for single women]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
50.
SOU 2007:3Föräldraskap vid assisterad befruktning [Parenthood in assisted reproduction]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
51.
SOU 2016:11Olika vägar till föräldraskap [Different paths to parenthood]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
52.
Bill 1984/85:2 [on artificial insemination]
53.
Bill 1987/88:160 [on conception outside the body]
54.
Bill 1989/90:107 [on the ratification of the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child]
55.
Bill 2001/02:89 [on treatment of involuntary childlessness]
56.
Bill 2004/05:137 [on assisted reproduction and parenthood]
57.
Bill 2014/15:127 [on assisted reproduction for single women]
58.
SoS-rapport 1998:7Förlossningar och barn födda efter provrörsbefruktningar 1982–1995 [Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation 1982–1995].
59.
SoS-rapport 2000:4 Neurologiska funktionshinder hos barn födda efter provrörsbefruktning 1982–1995 [Neurological handicaps in children born after IVF 1982–1995].
60.
SMER (1995) Assisterad befruktning. Synpunkter på vissa frågor i samband med befruktning utanför kroppen [Assisted reproduction: Consideration of certain questions related to conception outside the body].
Ds 2000:51Behandling av ofrivillig barnlöshet [Treatment of involuntary childlessness]. Memorandum of the Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
63.
Referral statements on Ds 2000:51Behandling av ofrivillig barnlöshet [Treatment of involuntary childlessness]. Memorandum of the Ministry of Health and Social Affairs:
64.
Dnr S2000/5967/HS Rädda Barnen
65.
Dnr S2000/5967/HS BRIS
66.
Referral statements on SOU 2014:29Assisterad befruktning för ensamstående kvinnor [Assisted reproduction for single women]:
