Posted work is often framed as a business model based on social dumping. Widespread regulatory evasion is imputed to regulation’s opacity, firms’ predatory practices and trade unions’ inability to organise posted workers. Isolation and precariousness channel posted workers’ agency into individualised reworking or exit strategies. These perspectives, however insightful, focus either on formal regulations, enforcement actors or host countries’ institutional settings. Drawing on biographical interviews with Italian construction workers posted abroad, and semi-structured interviews with non-posted workers and stakeholders of the sector in Italy, the article adopts an actor-centred perspective and mobilises the concept of labour regime to show how its disciplining elements operating in the construction sector in Italy stick with workers during their postings and enhance their disposability. Although this sticky labour regime constrains workers’ agency abroad, it remains continuously contested and offers ways for workers to subvert it and improve their employment conditions.
AhlstrandR (2022) Structures of subcontracting: work organisation, control, and labour in the Swedish building sector. Doctoral Thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
2.
AlbertiGDanajS (2017) Posting and agency work in British construction and hospitality: the role of regulation in differentiating the experiences of migrants. The International Journal of Human Resource Management28(21): 3065–3088.
3.
AlbertiGPeròD (2018) Migrating industrial relations: migrant workers’ initiative within and outside trade unions. British Journal of Industrial Relations56(4): 693–715.
4.
ANCE (2022) Osservatorio congiunturale sull’industria delle costruzioni – febbraio 2022. Rome: Associazione Nazionale Costruttori Edili.
5.
AndrijasevicR (2022) The dormitory regime revisited: time in transnational capitalist production. In: BaglioniECamplingLCoeNM, et al (eds) Labour Regimes and Global Production. Newcastle: Agenda Publishing, 285–300.
6.
AndrijasevicRSacchettoD (2016) From labour migration to labour mobility? The return of the multinational worker in Europe. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research22(2): 219–231.
7.
AnnerM (2015) Labor control regimes and worker resistance in global supply chains. Labor History56(3): 292–307.
ArnholtzJ (2021) Posted work, enforcement capacity and firm variation: evidence from the Danish construction sector. Economic and Industrial Democracy42(4): 1149–1164.
10.
ArnholtzJLillieN (2020a) European integration and the reconfiguration of national industrial relations: posted work as a driver of institutional change. In: ArnholtzJLillieN (eds) Posted Work in the European Union: The Political Economy of Free Movement. New York; London: Routledge, 1–30.
11.
ArnholtzJLillieN (2020b) Posted Work in the European Union: The Political Economy of Free Movement. New York; London: Routledge.
12.
BaglioniE (2018) Labour control and the labour question in global production networks: exploitation and disciplining in Senegalese export horticulture. Journal of Economic Geography18(1): 111–137.
13.
BaglioniE (2022) The making of cheap labour across production and reproduction: control and resistance in the Senegalese horticultural value chain. Work, Employment and Society36(3): 445–464.
14.
BaglioniECamplingLCoeNM, et al. (2022) Introduction: labour regimes and global production. In: BaglioniECamplingLCoeNM, et al. (eds) Labour Regimes and Global Production. Newcastle: Agenda Publishing, 1–28.
15.
BagnardiFSacchettoDVianelloFA (2022) The Importance of Timely Data Sharing Practices in Enforcing Labour Standards for Posted Construction Workers in Italy. Policy Brief 8. Vienna: European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research.
16.
BairJ (2010) On difference and capital: gender and the globalization of production. Signs36(1): 203–226.
17.
BaldanziS (2011) Mugello Sottosopra: Tute Arancioni Nei Cantieri Delle Grandi Opere. Rome: Ediesse.
18.
BerntsenL (2016) Reworking labour practices: on the agency of unorganized mobile migrant construction workers. Work, Employment and Society30(3): 472–488.
19.
BernstenLLillieN (2015) Breaking the law? Varieties of social dumping in a Pan-European labour market. In: BernaciakM (ed.) Market Expansion and Social Dumping in Europe. London; New York: Routledge, 43–60.
20.
BerntsenLLillieN (2016) Hyper-mobile migrant workers and Dutch trade union representation strategies at the Eemshaven construction sites. Economic and Industrial Democracy37(1): 171–187.
21.
BurawoyM (1985) The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes Under Capitalism and Socialism. London: Verso Books.
22.
CaroEBerntsenLLillieN, et al. (2015) Posted migration and segregation in the European construction sector. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41(10): 1600–1620.
23.
CeccagnoASacchettoD (2020) The mobility of workers living at work in Europe. Current Sociology68(3): 299–315.
24.
CilloR (2021) Mandatory mobility? The case of immigrant posted workers sent from Italy to Belgium in the construction sector. International Migration59(6): 156–171.
25.
CilloRPeroccoF (2021) Bridging the gap between legislation and practice in the posting of workers: Italy Country Report. POW-BRIDGE Italy Country Report. Venice: University of Venice.
26.
De AngelisG (2018) Il Mercato del Lavoro in Italia: una lettura a partire dal caso dell’Edilizia. Argomenti10(3): 65–82.
27.
DimitriadisI (2022) Migrants and undeclared employment within the European construction sector: challenging dichotomous approaches to workers’ agency. Work, Employment and Society37(5): 1321–1338.
28.
DorigattiLPalliniMPedersiniR (2022) Posted Workers from and to Italy. Facts and Figures. Leuven: POSTING.STAT project VS/2020/0499.
29.
EU Post Lab (2018) Developing experiences of administrative cooperation and enhanced access to information in the framework of the posting of workers. Assessment Report. Brussels: European Commission, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. Available at: https://www.fondazionebrodolini.it/sites/default/files/assessment_report_1.pdf (accessed 30 October 2023).
European Construction Sector Observatory (2021a) Country Profile Italy. Country Fact Sheet. Brussels: European Commission.
32.
European Construction Sector Observatory (2021b) Policy Fact Sheet - Italy: Superbonus. Country Fact Sheet. Brussels: European Commission.
33.
FelliniIFerroAFullinG (2007) Recruitment processes and labour mobility: the construction industry in Europe. Work, Employment and Society21(2): 277–298.
34.
FILLEA-FDV (2018) Osservatorio Costruzioni – II° Rapporto. Rome: FILLEA-CGIL e Fondazione Di Vittorio.
35.
FrangiLZhangTBanerjeeR (2021) Constructing inequalities: tenure trajectories of immigrant workers and union strategies in the Milan construction sector. British Journal of Industrial Relations59(2): 474–502.
36.
GigioLACamussiSMaccarroneV (2021) Changes in the employment structure and in job quality in Italy: a national and regional analysis. Questioni di Economia e Finanza 603, Occasional papers. Rome: Banca d’Italia.
37.
HouwerzijlMBernstenL (2020) Posting of workers: from a blurred notion associated with ‘cheap labour’ to a tool for ‘fair labour mobility’? In: ArnholtzJLillieN (eds) Posted Work in the European Union: The Political Economy of Free Movement. New York; London: Routledge, 147–166.
38.
IannuzziFESacchettoD (2020) Zone di variegata sovranità. Sistemi di controllo e protezioni dei lavoratori in distacco. Meridiana99: 177–198.
39.
INAIL (2021) Andamento degli infortuni sul lavoro e delle malattie professionali. Rome: National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work.
JonasAEG (1996) Local labour control regimes: uneven development and the social regulation of production. Regional Studies30(4): 323–338.
42.
LensDMusscheNMarxI (2022) A hole in the wall of fortress Europe: the trans-European posting of third-country labour migrants. International Migration60(2): 160–176.
43.
LillieNWagnerI (2015) Subcontracting, insecurity and posted work: evidence from construction, meat processing and ship building. In: DrahokoupilJ (ed.) The Outsourcing Challenge. Brussels: ETUI, 157–174.
44.
LillieNWagnerIBerntsenL (2014) Posted migration, spaces of exception, and the politics of labour relations in the European construction industry. In:HauptmeierMVidalM (eds) Comparative Political Economy of Work. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 312–331.
45.
MatyskaA (2020) Ambiguous mobility: Polish transnational workers navigating and changing the institutional landscape of posting. In: ArnholtzJLillieN (eds) Posted Work in the European Union: The Political Economy of Free Movement. New York; London: Routledge, 70–88.
46.
MrozowickiA (2011) Coping with Social Change: Life Strategies of Workers in Poland’s New Capitalism. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
47.
NaldiniMSaracenoC (2022) Changes in the Italian work-family system and the role of social policies in the last forty years. Stato e mercato1: 87–115.
48.
NovitzTAndrijasevicR (2020) Reform of the posting of workers regime - an assessment of the practical impact on unfree labour relations. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies58(5): 1325–1341.
49.
Osservatorio Distacco (2021) Distacco transnazionaleI Dati. Rome: Ministry of Labour and Social Policies.
50.
RamMEdwardsPJonesT (2007) Staying underground: informal work, small firms, and employment regulation in the United Kingdom. Work and Occupations34(3): 318–344.
51.
RodriguezRM (2010) Migrants for Export: How the Philippine State Brokers Labor to the World. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
52.
SartorDS (2022) Posted workers in Danimarca tra social dumping, diritti violati e organizzazione sindacale. In: CilloRPeroccoF (eds) Posted Workers: La Condizione Dei Lavoratori in Distacco Transnazionale in Europa. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari, 179–192.
53.
SchlingH (2022) ‘Just-in-time’ migrant workers in Czechia: racialization and dormitory labour regimes. In: BaglioniECamplingLCoeNM, et al (eds) Labour Regimes and Global Production. Newcastle: Agenda Publishing, 301–316.
54.
ShireK (2020) The social order of transnational migration markets. Global Networks20(3): 434–453.
55.
SmithCPunN (2006) The dormitory labour regime in China as a site for control and resistance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management17(8): 1456–1470.
56.
TangLZhangP (2019) Global problems, local solutions: unfree labour relations and seafarer employment with crewing agencies in China. Industrial Relations Journal50(3): 277–291.
57.
TaylorP (2010) The globalization of service work: analysing the transnational call centre value chain. In: SmithCThompsonP (eds) Working Life: Renewing Labour Process Analysis. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 244–268.
58.
TheunissenAZanoniPVan LaerK (2022) Fragmented capital and (the loss of) control over posted workers: a case study in the Belgian meat industry. Work, Employment and Society37(4): 934–951.
59.
ThompsonPSmithC (2010) Working Life: Renewing Labour Process Analysis. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
60.
ThompsonPVincentS (2010) Labour process theory and critical realism. In: SmithCThompsonP (eds) Working Life: Renewing Labour Process Analysis. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 47–69.
61.
TsingA (2009) Supply chains and the human condition. Rethinking Marxism21(2): 148–176.
62.
VoivozeanuA (2019) Precarious posted migration: the case of Romanian construction and meat-industry workers in Germany. Central and Eastern European Migration Review8(2): 85–99.
63.
WagnerI (2015) EU posted work and transnational action in the German meat industry. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research21(2): 201–213.
64.
WagnerIBerntsenL (2016) Restricted rights: obstacles in enforcing the labour rights of mobile EU workers in the German and Dutch construction sector. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research22(2): 193–206.
65.
WarrenT (2007) Conceptualizing breadwinning work. Work, Employment and Society21(2): 317–336.
66.
XhahoAÇaroEBaileyA (2021) Empowerment or a double burden? Work, family, and agency among Albanian migrant women in Greece. Gender, Place & Culture28(10): 1431–1451.
67.
XiangB (2012) Labor transplant: ‘point-to-point’ transnational labor migration in East Asia. South Atlantic Quarterly111(4): 721–739.
68.
XiangBLindquistJ (2014) Migration infrastructure. International Migration Review48(1): 122–148.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
