Process mapping provides insight into systems and processes in which improvement interventions are introduced and is seen as useful in healthcare quality improvement projects. There is little empirical evidence on the use of process mapping in healthcare practice. This study advances understanding of the benefits and success factors of process mapping within quality improvement projects.
Methods
Eight quality improvement projects were purposively selected from different healthcare settings within the UK’s National Health Service. Data were gathered from multiple data-sources, including interviews exploring participants’ experience of using process mapping in their projects and perceptions of benefits and challenges related to its use. These were analysed using inductive analysis.
Results
Eight key benefits related to process mapping use were reported by participants (gathering a shared understanding of the reality; identifying improvement opportunities; engaging stakeholders in the project; defining project's objectives; monitoring project progress; learning; increased empathy; simplicity of the method) and five factors related to successful process mapping exercises (simple and appropriate visual representation, information gathered from multiple stakeholders, facilitator’s experience and soft skills, basic training, iterative use of process mapping throughout the project).
Conclusions
Findings highlight benefits and versatility of process mapping and provide practical suggestions to improve its use in practice.
ChassinMR andBecherEC.The wrong patient. Ann Intern Med2002;
136: 826.
2.
GabaDMSingerSJSinaikoADet al.
Differences in safety climate between hospital personnel and naval aviators. Hum Factors2003;
45: 173–185.
3.
KleinJG.Five pitfalls in decisions about diagnosis and prescribing. BMJ2005;
330: 781–783.
4.
ReasonJ.Human error.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, p.324.
5.
TuckerAL.The impact of operational failures on hospital nurses and their patients. J Oper Manag2004;
22: 151.
6.
ØvretveitJ.Does improving quality save money. A review of evidence of which improvements to quality reduce costs to health service providers.
London:
The Health Foundation, 2009.
7.
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Improvement leaders’ guide. Process mapping, analysis and redesign. General improvement skills.
Coventry:
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, 2005.
TomsonCRvan der VeerSN.Learning from practice variation to improve the quality of care. Clin Med2013;
13: 19–23.
10.
ShortellSMRundallTG andHsuJ.Improving patient care by linking evidence-based medicine and evidence-based management. JAMA2007;
298: 673.
11.
KruskalJBReedyAPascalLet al.
Quality initiatives: lean approach to improving performance and efficiency in a radiology department. Radiographics2012;
32: 573–587.
12.
ColliganLAndersonJEPottsHWet al.
Does the process map influence the outcome of quality improvement work? A comparison of a sequential flow diagram and a hierarchical task analysis diagram. BMC Health Serv Res2010;
10: 7.
13.
NiemeijerGCTripAde JongLJet al.
Impact of 5 years of lean six sigma in a university medical center. Qual Manag Health Care2012;
21: 262–268.
14.
RobbinsJGarmanANSongPHet al.
How high-performance work systems drive health care value: an examination of leading process improvement strategies. Qual Manag Health Care2012;
21: 188
15.
SirioCASegelKTKeyserDJet al.
Pittsburgh regional healthcare initiative: a systems approach for achieving perfect patient care. Health Aff2003;
22: 157.
16.
JackaJM andKellerPJ.Business process mapping: improving customer satisfaction. Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons, 2009, p.337.
17.
DamelioR.The basics of process mapping. 2nd ed.
▪:
CRC Press, 2011, p.186.
18.
TrebbleTMHansiNHydesTet al.
Process mapping the patient journey: an introduction. BMJ2010;
341: c4078
McLaughlinNBurkeMASetlurNPet al.
Time-driven activity-based costing: a driver for provider engagement in costing activities and redesign initiatives. Neurosurg Focus2014;
37: E3.
ChandSMoskowitzHNorrisJBet al.
Improving patient flow at an outpatient clinic: study of sources of variability and improvement factors. Health Care Manag Sci2009;
12: 325–340.
23.
TaylorAJ andRandallC.Process mapping: enhancing the implementation of the Liverpool Care Pathway. Int J Palliat Nurs2007;
13: 163.
24.
Ben-TovimDIDoughertyMLO’connellTJet al.
Patient journeys: the process of clinical redesign. Med J Aust2008;
188: S14–S17.
25.
KingDLBen-TovimDI andBasshamJ.Redesigning emergency department patient flows: application of lean thinking to health care. Emerg Med Australas2006;
18: 391–397.
26.
HughesRG.Tools and strategies for quality improvement and patient safety. In: HughesRG (ed) Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses [internet].
Rockville, MD:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2008, Chapter 44.
27.
UlhassanWvon Thiele SchwarzUWesterlundHet al.
How visual management for continuous improvement might guide and affect hospital staff: a case study. Qual Manag Healthc2015;
24: 222.
28.
ParryGC andTurnerCE.Application of lean visual process management tools. Prod Plan Control2006;
17: 77–86.
29.
EdwardsN.Can quality improvement be used to change the wider healthcare system?BMJ Qual Saf2005;
14: 75–75.
30.
ClarksonPJBucklePColemanRet al.
Design for patient safety: a review of the effectiveness of design in the UK health service. J Eng Des2004;
15: 123.
31.
AntonacciGCalabreseAD’ambrogioAet al. A BPMN-based automated approach for the analysis of healthcare processes. In: 25th international conference on enabling technologies: infrastructure for collaborative enterprises (WETICE), Paris, France, 13–15 June 2016, pp.124–129. Piscataway, New Jersey, US: IEEE.
32.
ProudloveNCBisognoSOnggoBSSet al.
Towards fully-facilitated discrete event simulation modelling: addressing the model coding stage. Eur J Oper Res2017;
263: 583–595.
33.
PradhanMEdmondsM andRuncimanWB.Quality in healthcare: process. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol2001;
15: 555.
34.
Beuscart-ZéphirM-CPelayoSAnceauxFet al.
Cognitive analysis of physicians and nurses cooperation in the medication ordering and administration process. Int J Med Inf2007;
76: S65–S77.
35.
TaylorMJMcNicholasCNicolayCet al.
Systematic review of the application of the plan–do–study–act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf2013; 23: 290–298.
36.
RebugeÁ andFerreiraDR.Business process analysis in healthcare environments: a methodology based on process mining. Inf Syst2012;
37: 99–116.
37.
LenzR andReichertM.IT support for healthcare processes – premises, challenges, perspectives. Data Knowl Eng2007;
61: 39–58.
38.
ZanderK.Nursing case management: strategic management of cost and quality outcomes. J Nurs Adm1988;
18: 23–30.
39.
PanellaMMarchisioS andDiSF.Reducing clinical variations with clinical pathways: do pathways work?Int J Qual Health Care2003;
15: 509–521.
40.
FarleyK.The COPD critical pathway: a case study in progress. Qual Manag Health Care1995;
3: 43–54.
41.
KaplanHCProvostLPFroehleCMet al.
The model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf2011; 21: 13–20.
42.
SchubertLLiuAGanGet al.
Practical implementation of quality improvement for high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Pract Radiat Oncol2016;
6: 34–43.
43.
SujanMAChessumPRuddMet al.
Managing competing organizational priorities in clinical handover across organizational boundaries. J Health Serv Res Policy2015;
20: 17–25.
44.
BandaraWGableGG andRosemannM.Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study. Eur J Inf Syst2005;
14: 347–360.
45.
JunGTWardJMorrisZet al.
Health care process modelling: which method when?Int J Qual Health Care2009;
21: 214–224.
46.
EisenhardtKM andGraebnerME.Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manage J2007;
50: 25–32.
CaldwellSE andMaysN.Studying policy implementation using a macro, meso and micro frame analysis: the case of the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research & Care (CLAHRC) programme nationally and in North West London. Health Res Policy Syst2012;
10: 32.
49.
KennedyTJT andLingardLA.Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ2006;
40: 101–108.
OnwuegbuzieA andLeechN.Sampling designs in qualitative research: making the sampling process more public. Qual Rep2007;
12: 238–254.
52.
MorseJM.The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res1995;
5: 147–149.
53.
BarachP andJohnsonJK.Understanding the complexity of redesigning care around the clinical microsystem. BMJ Qual Saf2006;
15: i10.
54.
PattonMQ.Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res1999;
34: 1189–1208.
55.
MilesMB andHubermanAM.Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Beverly Hills:
SAGE, 1994, p.358.
56.
GlaserB.Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research.
▪:
Routledge, 2017, p.282.
57.
SoeAChetcutiPFoxGet al.
A bronchiolitis integrated care pathway for children. Int J Care Path2012;
16: 3–8.
58.
JonesDEJSutcliffeKPairmanJet al.
An integrated care pathway improves quality of life in primary biliary cirrhosis. QJM2008;
101: 535–543.
59.
ParkinP.Managing change in healthcare: using action research. London, UK:
SAGE, 2009, p.249.
60.
GrolRWensingMEcclesMet al. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in health care.
▪:
John Wiley & Sons, 2013, p.525.
61.
BatePMendelP andRobertG.Organizing for quality: the improvement journeys of leading hospitals in Europe and the United States.
▪:
Radcliffe Publishing, 2008, p.270.
62.
McCrackenG.The long interview. Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE, 1988, p.112.
63.
PattonMQ.Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed.
Newbury Park, CA:
SAGE Publications, Inc., 1990, p.536.
64.
MaysN andPopeC.Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ1995;
311: 109–112.
65.
LewisS.Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Health Promot Pract2015;
16: 473–475.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
