Abstract
Cartesian representationalism and the Enlightenment heritage more broadly continue to play a pivotal role in shaping the 21st-century human scientific theory and practice. This introduction to a special section on the topic surveys some aspects of that heritage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arponen
V. P. J.
(2013 a) ‘The Extent of Cognitivism ’, History of the Human Sciences 26 (5 ): 3 –21 .
2.
Arponen
V. P. J.
(2013 b) ‘On the Extent of Cognitivism: A Response to Michael Tissaw ’, History of the Human Sciences 26 (5 ): 27 –30 .
3.
Arponen
V. P. J.
Ribeiro
A.
(2014 ) ‘Understanding Rituals: A Critique of Representationalism ’, Norwegian Archaeological Review 47 (2 ): 161 –79 .
4.
Dennett
D. C.
(1991 ) Consciousness Explained . New York : Little, Brown and Co .
5.
Heidegger
M.
(2000 ) Being and Time . Oxford : Blackwell .
6.
Henry
J.
(2002 ) The Scientific Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science . New York : Palgrave .
7.
Latour
B.
(2005 ) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
8.
Wittgenstein
L.
(1958 ) Philosophical Investigations , 2nd edn ., trans.
Anscombe
G. E. M.
. Oxford : Basil Blackwell .