Energy modelling for mechanical machining processes is essential for energy labelling of machined products and as a foundation for selecting optimum cutting conditions that meet economic objectives while reducing energy demand and CO2 footprint. Electrical energy demand in machining can be modelled in two parts: ‘Basic Energy’ demand by the machine tool and ‘Tip Energy’ for actual material removal. A significant amount of research and energy evaluation is based on the use of average specific energy values and ignores the impact of machining conditions. In this comprehensive study, the evaluation of specific tip energy is undertaken, and the effect of chip thickness, tool wear, nose radius and cutting environment is quantified. This work is an essential guide for the application of models to estimate energy demand in practical machining processes. It is of significant importance to improve accuracy in energy-centric modelling of machining processes for sustainable manufacture and resource efficiency.
GutowskiTDahmusJThiriezA. Electrical energy requirements for manufacturing processes. In: Proceedings of the 13th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, Leuven, 31 May–2 June 2006, CIRP International, p.623.
2.
BalogunVAMativengaPT. Modelling of direct energy requirements in mechanical machining processes. J Clean Prod2013; 41: 179–186.
3.
XuXLWangHLYuTB. Research and application of NC machine tool energy consumption control optimization. Key Eng Mat2014; 579: 314–319.
4.
BalogunVAAramcharoenAMativengaPT. Impact of machine tools on the direct energy and associated carbon emissions for a standardized NC toolpath. In: NeeAYCSongBOngS-K (eds) Re-engineering manufacturing for sustainability. London: Springer, 2013, pp.197–202.
KellensKDewulfWOvercashM. Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life cycle inventory (UPLCI) CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 2: case studies. Int J Life Cycle Ass2012; 17: 242–251.
BalogunVAMativengaPT. Impact of un-deformed chip thickness on specific energy in mechanical machining processes. J Clean Prod2014; 69: 260–268.
11.
DraganescuFGheorgheMDoicinCV. Models of machine tool efficiency and specific consumed energy. J Mater Process Tech2003; 141: 9–15.
12.
DiazNRedelsheimerEDornfeldD. Energy consumption characterization and reduction strategies for milling machine tool use. In: Glocalized solutions for sustainability in manufacturing: proceedings of the 18th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering (ed HesselbachJHerrmannC), Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, 2–4 May 2011, pp.263–267. London: Springer.
13.
GhoshSChattopadhyayAPaulS. Modelling of specific energy requirement during high-efficiency deep grinding. Int J Mach Tool Manu2008; 48: 1242–1253.
14.
LiWKaraS. An empirical model for predicting energy consumption of manufacturing processes: a case of turning process. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2011; 225: 1636–1646.
15.
ÖzelTUlutanD. Effects of machining parameters and tool geometry on serrated chip formation, specific forces and energies in orthogonal cutting of nickel-based super alloy Inconel 100. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture. Epub ahead of print 19 December 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0954405413510291.
16.
KangIKimJSeoY. Investigation of cutting force behaviour considering the effect of cutting edge radius in the micro-scale milling of AISI 1045 steel. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2011; 225: 163–171.
17.
MoriMFujishimaMInamasuY. A study on energy efficiency improvement for machine tools. CIRP Ann: Manuf Techn2011; 60: 145–148.
18.
DevoldereTDewulfWDeprezW. Improvement potential for energy consumption in discrete part production machines. In: TakataSUmedaY (eds) Advances in life cycle engineering for sustainable manufacturing businesses. London: Springer, 2007, pp.311–316.
OdaYKawamuraYFujishimaM. Energy consumption reduction by machining process improvement. Procedia CIRP2012; 4: 120–124.
21.
BrinksmeierEWalterAJanssenR. Aspects of cooling lubrication reduction in machining advanced materials. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture1999; 213: 769–778.
22.
ZolgharniMJonesBBulpettR. Energy efficiency improvements in dry drilling with optimised diamond-like carbon coatings. Diam Relat Mater2008; 17: 1733–1737.
23.
MativengaPTRajemiMF. Calculation of optimum cutting parameters based on minimum energy footprint. CIRP Ann: Manuf Techn2011; 60: 149–152.
24.
HeYLiuFWuT. Analysis and estimation of energy consumption for numerical control machining. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2012; 226: 255–266.
25.
AnderbergSEKaraSBenoT. Impact of energy efficiency on computer numerically controlled machining. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture2010; 224: 531–541.
26.
DiazNHeluMJarvisA. Strategies for minimum energy operation for precision machining. In: Proceedings of the MTTRF 2009 annual meeting, Shanghai, P.R. China, 8–9 July 2009, Machine Tool Technologies Research Foundation, pp.47–50.
27.
DiazNNinomiyaKNobleJ. Environmental impact characterization of milling and implications for potential energy savings in industry. Procedia CIRP2012; 1: 518–523.
28.
ISO 3685:1993. Tool-life testing with single point turning tools. 2nd ed.Geneva: ISO, 1993.
29.
ChildsT. Friction modelling in metal cutting. Wear2006; 260: 310–318.
